Just so we're clear about muslims and homosexuals

Celticguy said:
That's nice of them.
Perhaps they could consider monitoring their imams and explain why saying killing homosexuals is okey doke is not muslimey. One has to wonder why they don't get proactive on cleaning up their pr.
Click to expand...

All religions should come out and denounce those who preach violence against gays.
 
Liberals didn't care about ISIS because they were just killing Christians and other brown people. Now that they killed their sacred gay cows, they might actually start to care.

Either way, their ideological heads are exploding. Who do they back now? Evil US, or continue their support for radical Islam... Hmmm.
 
Poor libtards twisting in the wind.

Anyone hear from HowAIDS? Would be a real tragedy if he was offed. Was Poet from Florida too?
 
Rana said:
That's nice, now I guess it is name calling, I'll spare you my thoughts.
Click to expand...

So is it just anatta that you hold to such a high degree; because you evidently missed the posts that were made prior to her comment, to which you appear to be so concerned about??

Rune said:
Bullshit you fucking halfwit.
This attack like many others is directly attributable to OUR action in The ME, not vice versa.
Until we stop launching drone attacks against innocent civillians these attacks will remain manifold and ifanxthing increase in severity and number.
Fucking idiotic childn
Click to expand...

Rune said:
Bullshit.
This act is a reaction you fucking blind idiot.
Click to expand...
 
Rune said:
It doesn't matter.
None of this would be happening if we were not in the ME.
Click to expand...
you fail to understand the nature of Salafist jihad. It's not simply ME.east v. west.
as mentioned scores of times before apostates and takfiri are the enemy, urged on by Quranic originalism
 
anatta said:
you fail to understand the nature of Salafist jihad. It's not simply ME.east v. west.
as mentioned scores of times before apostates and takfiri are the enemy, urged on by Quranic originalism
Click to expand...

A more realistc approximation would be that nobody wants their neighbor to steal their turf or hump their donkey.
 
moon2012 said:
A more realistc approximation would be that nobody wants their neighbor to steal their turf or hump their donkey.
Click to expand...
that would explain individual violence or state v state war. It does not explain internecine Sunni war based on interpretation
 
anatta said:
that would explain individual violence or state v state war. It does not explain internecine Sunni war based on interpretation
Click to expand...

When you're defending your turf and your ass you don't really give a toss about internecine Sunni war based on interpretation.
 
moon2012 said:
When you're defending your turf and your ass you don't really give a toss about internecine Sunni war based on interpretation.
Click to expand...
do I need to spell it out then? The deflection from western apologists is we ( west) somehow were not in the ME -we would not be targeted.
But it's never spelled out just exactly what "in" the ME is. a naval presence? air bases in SA that bin Laden objected to?
the US west/ is not at war there except Syria now.Do you think all this is blowback from war..no.

it comes from Islamic jihad. almost all of it from Sunni's expressed as AQ or IS. Those groups have
have radicalized from the days of the mujahideen in Afghanistan against the Russians,and I suppose before it with the Israelis and the Palestinians.

ISIS is more directly from AQI - but it's just as fierce against fellow Muslims as against western. It's much more then some nationalist movement
It's a pan Islamic movement, but not an inclusive one, it practices internecine killing
 
You're talking quasi-intellectualized turf and ass defending. These foot-soldiers have no more understanding of what you're spouting than anybody reading it here. The basics are simple- get off my turf and get your hands off my ass.
Recruiting sergeants looking for fresh meat for the grinder don't offer spiritual rewards to the saps in the line- they offer turf and ass.
 
anatta said:
do I need to spell it out then? The deflection from western apologists is we ( west) somehow were not in the ME -we would not be targeted.
But it's never spelled out just exactly what "in" the ME is. a naval presence? air bases in SA that bin Laden objected to?
the US west/ is not at war there except Syria now.Do you think all this is blowback from war..no.

it comes from Islamic jihad. almost all of it from Sunni's expressed as AQ or IS. Those groups have
have radicalized from the days of the mujahideen in Afghanistan against the Russians,and I suppose before it with the Israelis and the Palestinians.

ISIS is more directly from AQI - but it's just as fierce against fellow Muslims as against western. It's much more then some nationalist movement
It's a pan Islamic movement, but not an inclusive one, it practices internecine killing
Click to expand...

PBS have got it about right, maybe MoonTwat ought to read it!

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/target/etc/modern.html
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top