But the SOB left the faggot out, didn't he?
Jussie Smollett is out of jail!
- Thread starter ExpressLane
- Start date
But the SOB left the faggot out, didn't he?
What the fuck does this have to do with that judge letting the faggot out of jail when he purposely faked a hate crime?
reagansghost
eternal
the judge is a Trumper you fucking idiot
I doubt it, but an asshole all the same, fucking tard...
reagansghost
eternal
link?
A link to my opinion of the judge who left that race-baiting faggot out of jail? DUH!
You provide a link that the judge was a "Trumper."
ExpressLane
Verified User
Lefties are so funny tying to excuse a person who was trying to cause racial strife. The man needs to serve his time and get along with his life.
ExpressLane
Verified User
No he isn't
cancel2 2022
Canceled
You're insane.
Lightbringer
Loves Me Some Souls
Who is Jussie Smollett? Is this someone I should give a shit about?
He tried to further racism by faking an attack and calling it racially motivated. He got off easy.
Lightbringer
Loves Me Some Souls
Maybe we should get some pipe hittin' crackers from the valley together and go teach this nigger a lesson.
"If you or a loved one has been convicted in federal court and is now in jail, is in prison, and you’re bringing an appeal, one of the big questions you'll have is whether you can get out of jail pending that appeal. There is, it's possible to do that look. Let me explain a little bit have how that works.
You've got a show two things in order to get out of prison while the appeals pending.
First, you've got to show that you're not going to be a danger to anyone else and you’re not going to run. The legal standard is you've got a show by clear and convincing evidence. You've got to the same judge you were before, during the trial. And you've got a show that you're not gonna hurt anyone, you're not to be a danger to anyone, and you've also got a show that you're not going to Paris.
What clear and convincing evidence means, really is you've got to convince the judge so there's not a meaningful doubt left in that judge's mind about whether or not you're going to be a problem.
If you can do that, the second thing you've got a show is that you're likely to win and issue on the appeal, which is going to mean that you won't have prison time. So, for example, if your challenging the conviction itself you're saying that the judge just got a wrong, the jury got it wrong, I'm gonna win this appeal and when I win this appeal I'm not gonna spend any time in prison. That's the kind of issue that you can bring. The problem is of course, you're bringing that issue to the same district court judge who presided over the trial and you’re trying to convince that judge that there was something that the judge did that was that was wrong. More often than not, that can be a tough sell
The second part of that is you've got to convince the judge that whatever the error was mattered.
So, for example, if you were sentenced to five years in prison and your argument is I should have been sentenced to only three years in prison, they won't let you out of prison while you argued that issue on appeal. It's got to be something that’s going to mean that there won't be prison time there at all.If you can convince the judge for the court of appeals that that's right, you shouldn't spend time in prison at all, then you can be released pending appeal. Otherwise it can be a very difficult of a motion to win, but the options out there. And that's one thing you can you can raise and try to fight if you want avoid spending time in prison during the appeal."
https://www.whitecollarcrimeresourc...ile-my-federal-criminal-appeal-is-pendin.html
You've got a show two things in order to get out of prison while the appeals pending.
First, you've got to show that you're not going to be a danger to anyone else and you’re not going to run. The legal standard is you've got a show by clear and convincing evidence. You've got to the same judge you were before, during the trial. And you've got a show that you're not gonna hurt anyone, you're not to be a danger to anyone, and you've also got a show that you're not going to Paris.
What clear and convincing evidence means, really is you've got to convince the judge so there's not a meaningful doubt left in that judge's mind about whether or not you're going to be a problem.
If you can do that, the second thing you've got a show is that you're likely to win and issue on the appeal, which is going to mean that you won't have prison time. So, for example, if your challenging the conviction itself you're saying that the judge just got a wrong, the jury got it wrong, I'm gonna win this appeal and when I win this appeal I'm not gonna spend any time in prison. That's the kind of issue that you can bring. The problem is of course, you're bringing that issue to the same district court judge who presided over the trial and you’re trying to convince that judge that there was something that the judge did that was that was wrong. More often than not, that can be a tough sell
The second part of that is you've got to convince the judge that whatever the error was mattered.
So, for example, if you were sentenced to five years in prison and your argument is I should have been sentenced to only three years in prison, they won't let you out of prison while you argued that issue on appeal. It's got to be something that’s going to mean that there won't be prison time there at all.If you can convince the judge for the court of appeals that that's right, you shouldn't spend time in prison at all, then you can be released pending appeal. Otherwise it can be a very difficult of a motion to win, but the options out there. And that's one thing you can you can raise and try to fight if you want avoid spending time in prison during the appeal."
https://www.whitecollarcrimeresourc...ile-my-federal-criminal-appeal-is-pendin.html
NiftyNiblick
1960s Chick Magnet
I had to Google the poor motherfucker.
People must have nothing important to think about.
he faked a violent crime lied about it costing the city thousands...just so he could blame whitey he is a huge racist
Who gives a shit?
Who is he a threat to while out on bail?
If he tried the same thing he got convicted for, again, absolutely NO ONE would believe him this time.
And he is too well known to be a risk to flight.
And it's not like he was convicted of rape or murder.
It's a nothing story that you people are trying to make into something big.
Who is he a threat to while out on bail?
If he tried the same thing he got convicted for, again, absolutely NO ONE would believe him this time.
And he is too well known to be a risk to flight.
And it's not like he was convicted of rape or murder.
It's a nothing story that you people are trying to make into something big.
Nope. A case where some person of color gets caught lying about being assaulted due to his/her race though -- it's cause for celebration among the KKK types! You know what this means? They're *ALL* lying about the times when they were discriminated against or attacked for their race! It's exciting because now, whenever a person of color reports such misdeeds, they can chant "Smollett! Smollett! Smollett!" Just ask any woman who has reported a rape and not been believed.
Just like you, eh?
Monad Portal
Was it me?
Nope. A case where some person of color gets caught lying about being assaulted due to his/her race though -- it's cause for celebration among the KKK types! You know what this means? They're *ALL* lying about the times when they were discriminated against or attacked for their race! It's exciting because now, whenever a person of color reports such misdeeds, they can chant "Smollett! Smollett! Smollett!" Just ask any woman who has reported a rape and not been believed.
Jennifer flowers?
paula jones?
Yakuda
Verified User
You realize we could roll out a thousand examples of you retarded pig fucking leftists whining about the exact same thing right? At least pretend not to be that stupid and say "Yes'. The problem is you're a retarded pig fucking leftist so I already know the answer.