July 2016 was unquestionably the hottest month in 136 years of continuous record

863824-pn-lord-monckton-new.jpg
monthlyanoms_gis_201607.gif
 
It's funny how NASA still insist on using ground temperatures to plot these meaningless graphs rather than use their own satellites. There has been a massive El Nino comparable to that of 1998, it remains to be seen how much of an effect the coming La Nina will have on global temperatures. There is more and more evidence that the Sun may well be entering its quietest period since the Maunder Minimum, although you can guarantee that even that will be blamed on Man.

Sent from my Lenovo K50-t5 using Tapatalk

Why would you expect thermometers at ground level to be less accurate than a satellite in space? If you wanted to know the temperature outside your house, what would you trust more? A thermometer outside your home, or some satellite?

Regardless, the errors in the satellite models have been corrected:

https://www.gfdl.noaa.gov/bibliography/related_files/tmlw0602.pdf

The only reason you trusted them more in the first place is because they agreed with your preconceived notions.
 
Why would you expect thermometers at ground level to be less accurate than a satellite in space? If you wanted to know the temperature outside your house, what would you trust more? A thermometer outside your home, or some satellite?

Regardless, the errors in the satellite models have been corrected:

https://www.gfdl.noaa.gov/bibliography/related_files/tmlw0602.pdf

The only reason you trusted them more in the first place is because they agreed with your preconceived notions.

Don't talk crap, I trust them more because they cover the whole of the planet 24/7/365 and are incredibly accurate. Vast areas of the Earth are not covered by land weather stations including much of the Arctic, most of the Antarctic and the southern oceans. I will let Judith Curry explain more for you!

https://judithcurry.com/2016/02/09/...ustments-using-the-climate-reference-network/
 
Last edited:
Back
Top