Julian Assange will be questioned over sex assault allegations in London

Just because one purportedly supports a cause, doesn't give them a free pass at rape. And it was more than one victim, dumbass.
 
Eno L. Camino said:
Just because one purportedly supports a cause, doesn't give them a free pass at rape. And it was more than one victim, dumbass.
Click to expand...

Two ' cases ' have been dropped and Assange has always offered to be interviewed by the Swedish police with regard to the third.
The free world believes that the charge is concocted in order to extradite Assange to the US- where his exposure of world-wide NSA criminality still smarts the spooks.
I'm telling you this because I beleive you to be a bit thick.
 
Julian Assange should be allowed free and compensated, UN panel finds

(CNN)—A U.N. rights working group found Friday that Wikileaks founder Julian Assange has been arbitrarily detained by being forced to hole up in the Ecuadorian Embassy in London to avoid arrest.

Assange, who is wanted in Sweden for alleged sex offenses, has been in the embassy for three and a half years. He has said he fears Sweden will extradite him to the United States, where he could face the death penalty for revealing government secrets.

http://edition.cnn.com/2016/02/05/europe/julian-assange-ruling/index.html
Click to expand...

Now, if the UK and the Swedes fail to abide by a human rights ruling then neither can ever be taken seriously on any international human rights issue again. The fact is that their human populations want human rights- and the egos of their respective governments shouldn't mean squat.
 
I can't see how banging a ho, consensually , without a condom is a 'sex act' anyway - sounds like leftie fem twaddle to me!
 
moon2012 said:
Two ' cases ' have been dropped and Assange has always offered to be interviewed by the Swedish police with regard to the third.
The free world believes that the charge is concocted in order to extradite Assange to the US- where his exposure of world-wide NSA criminality still smarts the spooks.
I'm telling you this because I beleive you to be a bit thick.
Click to expand...

He didn't commit his rapes in the US, and I doubt Sweden would extradite him.

Toby451 said:
I can't see how banging a ho, consensually , without a condom is a 'sex act' anyway - sounds like leftie fem twaddle to me!
Click to expand...

I've never understood the logic that because he got consent for sex, it was okay not to wear a condom. Only men are capable of being this stupid.
 
Eno L. Camino said:
He didn't commit his rapes in the US, and I doubt Sweden would extradite him.
Click to expand...

Well, when it's your own life at stake your perceptions of US/Swedish injustice become a tad sharpened.

I've never understood the logic that because he got consent for sex, it was okay not to wear a condom. Only men are capable of being this stupid.
Click to expand...

Well, you know what guys are like at the moment before entry- get the consent form signed, check the sports reports, make sure there's something to raid in the fridge later.
 
A century ago, people might not have seen a difference. Then they invented modern contraceptives, and women realized that "getting fucked" and contact with semen were two different things, potentially, the latter of which was more problematic. And I don't believe you are being honest when you spout that rhetoric. It is a deliberate lie - all day, everyday.
 
Unless you want to redefine the definition of rape, then this whiny antsy little Swedish fem ought to cease her histrionics - let's face it, she had sex with him because she thought he was a big shot, then changed her mind later and cried rape - she ought to be jailed if anything
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top