Yakuda
Verified User
Why you gotta insult maniacs like that?
Judge who signed off on Trump raid has anti-Trump posts and shared content from ‘Woke
- Thread starter ziggy
- Start date
Why you gotta insult maniacs like that?
Yakuda
Verified User
And wasn't there some lame ass thing about "intent"? So I guess if you didnt intend to kill someone you can just go back to your life.
Monad Portal
Was it me?
yes. comey elaborated that there was no intent.
intent is not part of the applicable law, however.
Yakuda
Verified User
Indeed unless your name is Hilary
Right.. But what statute do you believe she violated?
Monad Portal
Was it me?
do you believe there are no laws regarding handling of classified information?
Prove it, prove what you claimed entered into his decision, and a tweet reproduced isn’t proof, document something you say
Monad Portal
Was it me?
that tweet is proof.
I believe there are... I do not think receiving emails are covered by that law.
Monad Portal
Was it me?
comey believed they are covered. he said there was evidence of crime, but didn't recommend charges for .....who really knows why.
probably corruption.
That is not what Comey said. Show me the statute you believe she violated...
I do not see how Trump did not violate. 18 U.S. Code § 2071
You idiots twist words all day, NOT WHAT COMEY SAID!
So one 280 character tweet proves not only that the guy hates Trump, but also that this hatred of Trump is reflected in his decisions regarding the administration of the law? Without you even knowing what was bought before him, the evidence he was presented, the guy was always going to rule in opposition because he hates Trump as reflected in a tweet?
Next
Monad Portal
Was it me?
do you believe there are no laws regarding where classified information may be kept?
Monad Portal
Was it me?
all signs point to YES.
Absurd, especially given you are totally clueless as to what evidence was actually bought before him to decide upon
Monad Portal
Was it me?
as are you.
Of course there are laws regarding the handling of classified information. Those laws require proving beyond a reasonable doubt that the person charged knowingly and willingly mishandled the information. That means you have to first prove there was classified information, then prove the person knew it was classified, then prove that the person knowing it was classified violated how it is to be handled.
So...
Prove beyond a reasonable doubt that "(c)" means this sentence is classified.
I see you have progressed to getting your answers from a magic 8 ball. Does that mean your tinfoil hat is starting to work?
Monad Portal
Was it me?
Reply hazy, try again.