BidenPresident
Verified User
U.S. District Judge Aileen M. Cannon heard two hours of legal jousting between prosecutor Jay Bratt and defense lawyer Emil Bove, who argued the language of the World War I-era Espionage Act that Trump is charged with breaking is too unclear to be the basis of an indictment against the 45th president of the United States. For most of the morning session, Cannon seemed to take the argument seriously. Toward the end, however, she hinted at an underlying skepticism toward Trump’s request.
“You would agree that declaring a statute is unconstitutionally vague is quite an extraordinary step?” Cannon asked Bove.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2024/03/14/trump-cannon-hearing-espionage-act-pra/
“You would agree that declaring a statute is unconstitutionally vague is quite an extraordinary step?” Cannon asked Bove.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2024/03/14/trump-cannon-hearing-espionage-act-pra/