Yes, encounters. How many got in that weren't encountered?Encounters. Thank you.
Yes, encounters. How many got in that weren't encountered?Encounters. Thank you.
Does that make sense to you? A court hearing would have established all the questions in debate. We would know what the father and the mother wanted. We could have established who was the legal guardian and who could take care of the child. Courts have ways to determine things and questioning a 2 year old is not one of them.Question: What "meaningful (legal) process" can a 2-year-old comprehend?
How did they count the amount if they weren't encountered? Magic?Yes, encounters. How many got in that weren't encountered?
I suggest you contact the immigration and research groups in the link I listed in my answer to your previous question.How did they count the amount if they weren't encountered? Magic?
If they can count, they can arrest and deport.I suggest you contact the immigration and research groups in the link I listed in my answer to your previous question.
And yet Biden deported more.
I told you, they don't but accept that they do slip in as collateral damage to having an open border that they want.You still haven't answered the question. Why does the "Left" want dangerous illegals here as claimed?
The person the hearing is about is a 2-year-old. It's like giving animals rights. Neither a 2-year-old nor an animal can understand the proceedings and those proceedings are about them.Does that make sense to you? A court hearing would have established all the questions in debate. We would know what the father and the mother wanted. We could have established who was the legal guardian and who could take care of the child. Courts have ways to determine things and questioning a 2 year old is not one of them.
Now you're pivoting to them wanting an open border. FYI open border means dangerous illegals here. Again the question remains.Not as a percentage of illegal entries. By percentage, Biden's removal rate was the lowest in US history.
I told you, they don't but accept that they do slip in as collateral damage to having an open border that they want.
Now you're pivoting to them wanting an open border. FYI open border means dangerous illegals here. Again the question remains.
No one wants dangerous illegals here. Not even as a collateral damage.
No proof that Garcia is dangerous. The fight is over due process (its in the Constitution).They want an open border, and they want lots of illegal immigrants to come in. They accept that some criminals will slip in too even if they don't want them here.
Then why the fight over guys like Abrego Garcia?
Already done, Sybil.Does that make sense to you? A court hearing would have established all the questions in debate. We would know what the father and the mother wanted. We could have established who was the legal guardian and who could take care of the child. Courts have ways to determine things and questioning a 2 year old is not one of them.
Math error. Go look up a 'greater than' symbol to find out what it means.How did they count the amount if they weren't encountered? Magic?
He just showed he has no idea what a 'greater than' symbol means.I suggest you contact the immigration and research groups in the link I listed in my answer to your previous question.
Inversion fallacy.Now you're pivoting to them wanting an open border.
You do. Don't try to deny your own posts!FYI open border means dangerous illegals here. Again the question remains.
No one wants dangerous illegals here. Not even as a collateral damage.
Inversion fallacy. You cannot blame YOUR problems on anybody else, Sybil.I understand that you like to be contrary but it's tiresome. No worse than being a troll.
Blatant lie (denial).No proof that Garcia is dangerous.
Done.The fight is over due process (its in the Constitution).
Blatant lie (denial). DON'T TRY TO DENY YOUR OWN POSTS! DON'T TRY TO DENY THE TREASON OF BIDEN!Democrats do not support open border. It's a big fat lie.
Blatant lie (denial). DON'T TRY TO DENY YOUR OWN POSTS! DON'T TRY TO DENY THE TREASON OF BIDEN!Grok, do Democrats support open borders?
No, Democrats generally do not support open borders. Most advocate for immigration reform that includes stronger border security, pathways to citizenship for undocumented immigrants, and humanitarian protections, but not unrestricted entry. Policies vary among individuals, with some emphasizing enforcement and others focusing on compassion, but "open borders" as a literal policy is not a mainstream Democratic position.
How can it be a treason if Biden is brain dead?Blatant lie (denial). DON'T TRY TO DENY YOUR OWN POSTS! DON'T TRY TO DENY THE TREASON OF BIDEN!