Judge Overturns Chickenshit Administration Decision

Here is where you will ALWAYS lose. You generalize about everyone. You have always generalized about me on this board as "Joe Liberal," and projected positions on to me that I do not hold. You generalize about cops, about gov't, and about everything else. You take the words & actions of one or a few, and you paint a much larger group with that brush.
obfuscation. here's my issue about government in general. If a single agent/cop screws up, unless it's a totally egregious offense that is disgraceful to the public at large, government will circle the wagons and defend the conduct. As my earlier example, I asked you if a single cop is arresting someone who is not resisting and that cop punches said arrestee 6 times (an OBVIOUS assault against the law) and the several officers around this cop do not arrest him immediately, are they not condoning the illegal act?
 
Who cares what your reaction was? You implied that no one is held accountable when something goes wrong, well, Brown was forced to "resign". He was certainly held accountable. Bush did try to initially cover up for him, but then Bush was held accountable for that. So I guess your question has been answered.
your left/right blinders are in overdrive again, aren't they? being forced to resign and live off your sizable pension the rest of your days is NOT being held accountable. pretending that this is being held accountable emphasizes your moronic idiocy. so your statement of most people are morons is pretty correct, seeing that you're one of them.
 
good god, why do you fucktards continually equate personal liberty and responsibility with anarchy? does being free terrify you that badly?
Are you seriously this obtuse that you can't that "We The People" are not professionals in food and drug safety? That "We The People" are not experts on industrial safety? That "We The People" are not experts in Medicine, Law, Engineering, Finance?

You man not see the consequences of your ideology as resulting in anarchy but that's exactly what it is a self fullfillng prophecy for. Sound and effective governance is important and the more complex and technological our society becomes the more difficult it becomes to govern well.
 
Because minors should not be having sex, great job now they are being encouraged once more to engage in unprotected pre marital sex, you people are absolute idiots.

No, minors should not have sex, but they do, even when encouraged not to or taught if they do they should use protection. Minors do many risky things, it is part of the rebellion process against their establshment. Children aren't perfect and when mistakes are made I would rather they have this option then have to have an abortion.
 
Back
Top