Judge Orders Justice Dept. to Redact and Release Version of Affidavit Used to Search

T. A. Gardner said:
I expect one of two outcomes from this late next week--assuming the DoJ doesn't stall release:

1. The affidavit will be heavily redacted and just fuel suspicions of those that already had them, while doing nothing to bolster the case of those that approve of the raid.

or

2. The affidavit will be so broad and vague that in addition to being forced to release it, the DoJ takes yet another blow to their credibility while the MSM and supporters of the raid dissemble and equivocate trying to make it sound like the raid was truly unbiased and legitimate.
Click to expand...
it's an unConstitutional general warrant
there are no specific timetable (the entire Trump presidency) and allowed searches for "boxes next to boxes" -unnamed docs.

The best part is threatening the Espionage Act, while Garland sat on the warrant application for weeks :rolleyes:
So much for "exigent circumstances"
 
PostmodernProphet said:
how is his claim that he had the right to possess declassified documents, an admission he didn't have a right to possess the documents?.......does your brain have an on/off switch?.......
Click to expand...

There is zero proof that any of those documents had been declassified. You provide that proof and we can continue on....
 
T. A. Gardner said:
That has ZERO to do with the affidavit itself and is virtually irrelevant here. The question on the table is Will the affidavit support the warrant as written and issued? I suspect it won't. The search might still be justifiable, but not using the sweeping and vague language the warrant had in it. My suspicion is that the affidavit will not support the search warrant as written.
Click to expand...
the whole thing is "vague" backed up by "Espionage Act" . It's a political move
Reports are garland waited a couple weeks to press the warrant ( maybe it takes that long to judge shop?)
it's fishing for Liz's 1/6. Unless anyone thinks "Espionage" is real
 
PostmodernProphet said:
odd....I find it far more likely there would be photos of you wiping your ass with the American flag than of Trump.......I'm sure most folks here would find that more likely as well......
Click to expand...

As you might understand if you understood rhetoric, your post is completely off topic and illustrates you misunderstood my point or intentionally ignored it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top