Judge Nappy says criminal investigation warranted

Jarod said:
Your hero Nappy does not think so...
Click to expand...

And your hero Dershowitz thinks it would be a waste of time because there's no crime there lol.

While everyone is Investigation happy, why don't they investigate the DNC in the Ukrainian collusion? Or the Clintons actual collusion with Russia on uranium.

Let's do it all and get it over with.
 
Jarod said:
So, you assume that a politically appointed Judge necessarily is a legal expert? Embarrassing for you!
Click to expand...
by that logic, we can all assume that ginsburg, sotomayer, and kagan are all politically appointed morons?

Jarod said:
I personally think Nappy knows he is spewing a lot of Bullshit, but he does it because he is paid big bucks to get fools to follow him on television.
Click to expand...

I also personally believe you're a glorified ambulance chaser who knows very little about the law, but it makes you money......so
 
Jarod said:
You were right? How so?
Click to expand...

I predicted a Trump win. I correctly predicted he would win NC, FL, MI,PA and WI

I also correctly predicted that McCuntell and Ryan would be bigger obstacles to Trump because deep down they would have preferred Hillary as they are afraid to govern.

All predictions I made. And unlike you, I was 100% correct.
 
Darth Omar said:
And your hero Dershowitz thinks it would be a waste of time because there's no crime there lol.

While everyone is Investigation happy, why don't they investigate the DNC in the Ukrainian collusion? Or the Clintons actual collusion with Russia on uranium.

Let's do it all and get it over with.
Click to expand...

He is no hero of mine. But, I will point out he said that before the Don, Jr. story came out.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
by that logic, we can all assume that ginsburg, sotomayer, and kagan are all politically appointed morons?



I also personally believe you're a glorified ambulance chaser who knows very little about the law, but it makes you money......so
Click to expand...

1) You cannot assume they are or arnt, based solely on their job titles.

2) I know very little about a whole lot of the law, but I know a LOT about a few specific areas. I know enough about Constitutional Law to know Nappy is a hack.
 
Jarod said:
So, you assume that a politically appointed Judge necessarily is a legal expert? Embarrassing for you!

I personally think Nappy knows he is spewing a lot of Bullshit, but he does it because he is paid big bucks to get fools to follow him on television.
Click to expand...

Care to compare credentials?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Napolitano

Hmmm who would I take legal advice from? Napolitano or an ambulance chasing political hack on JPP like you?

Tough one.
 
Alice in Liberaland said:
I predicted a Trump win. I correctly predicted he would win NC, FL, MI,PA and WI

I also correctly predicted that McCuntell and Ryan would be bigger obstacles to Trump because deep down they would have preferred Hillary as they are afraid to govern.

All predictions I made. And unlike you, I was 100% correct.
Click to expand...

I was wrong when I thought HRC would win, I always predicted it would be very close.

Did you predict Obama would get reelected?
 
Alice in Liberaland said:
Care to compare credentials?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Napolitano

Hmmm who would I take legal advice from? Napolitano or an ambulance chasing political hack on JPP like you?

Tough one.
Click to expand...

The persona he plays on television offers a very unbalanced and illogical view of the law, often failing to share the widely held majority position, and presenting a small minority position as if it were fact. He presents an overly simplistic view of elements of the law often misrepresenting the true nature of his "theories" to appeal to a narrow viewership.

Rump is president, does that make him an expert at governing? HA!
 
Jarod said:
1) You cannot assume they are or arnt, based solely on their job titles.
Click to expand...
yet that is EXACTLY what you did with Napolitano

Jarod said:
2) I know very little about a whole lot of the law, but I know a LOT about a few specific areas. I know enough about Constitutional Law to know Nappy is a hack.
Click to expand...
and I would counter that as you know very little about constitutional law because of your stint as a prosecutor. i'll take a judges opinion about it over a prosecutors any day of the week and twice on sunday.
 
Jarod said:
The persona he plays on television offers a very unbalanced and illogical view of the law, often failing to share the widely held majority position, and presenting a small minority position as if it were fact. He presents an overly simplistic view of elements of the law often misrepresenting the true nature of his "theories" to appeal to a narrow viewership.

Rump is president, does that make him an expert at governing? HA!
Click to expand...

Please provide specific examples of what you accuse Napolitano of
 
Alice in Liberaland said:
So you are a Napolitano fan now?

You weren't a while ago.

Just need to clarify. Or is your support politically situational as to what you think will damage Trump?

Do you think you are going to change any Trump supporters minds? Or is this just for you?
Click to expand...

How about the concept that when you violate the law there are consequences? Or does not apply to you lemmingtards?
 
SmarterthanYou said:
yet that is EXACTLY what you did with Napolitano


and I would counter that as you know very little about constitutional law because of your stint as a prosecutor. i'll take a judges opinion about it over a prosecutors any day of the week and twice on sunday.
Click to expand...

1) How did I do that?

2) So you would take Ruth Ginsburg's opinion over Nappy? She outranks him?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top