Judge declares PA voter ID law is invalid

Read this link. If you give a driver's license or state ID it already has a photo on it. So why the need for a 2nd photo?

3b Pennsylvania Driver’s License (DL), PennDOT ID # OR Social Security
Number: You must supply a PA Driver’s License Number or PennDOT ID # if
you have one. If you do not have a PA Driver’s License Number or PennDOT
ID #, you must supply the last four digits of your Social Security Number. If you
do not have a Social Security Number, please check the box to the right of 3b.

http://www.dosimages.pa.gov/pdf/OnlineVoterRegFormBlank.pdf

So what happens when you check the box to the right of 3b indicating you do not have a license OR social security number? Do they come pick you up and haul you offto jail, or do they register you anyway and throw up their hands like surrender monkeys?
 
Only someone as incredibly stupid as you could come up with the phony argument about so few safeguards, etc.

And the bottom line that none of you dullards has the stones to address is that there is nothing in the Constitution about needing photo ID to vote, and the only reason repubs are harping on it now is because their party's in the toilet.


Only citizens are allowed to vote.....how would you address how that is accomplished ?
If you have a better way, I'm all for listening to it....
 
So what happens when you check the box to the right of 3b indicating you do not have a license OR social security number? Do they come pick you up and haul you offto jail, or do they register you anyway and throw up their hands like surrender monkeys?

Google it, you freakish whack job know-it-all. I'm done doing all the heavy lifting for a nasty piece of goods like you.
 
Are you that stupid or what? I already posted the requirements for PA voter registration, go back and read them and stop wasting my time with what you think are "gotcha" comments.

Dear in sufferable dishonest boor, I read it and it is pretty much a faith based form anyone can fill out and lie on. As a matter of fact, it is ironic that two of the requested types of documentation was a drivers license or SS number, which anyone can forge, and/OR check the box saying you have neither.

Now gee, not being a dishonest insufferable partisan boor, I would say that just about anyone can vote in PA without proving they are a citizen entitled to vote. It just doesn't give me much confidence in the system.

So with that, how does attempting to improve the integrity of any voting system impede someone's priveledge to vote? Or are you going to avoid the honest answer and continue deflecting, obfuscating and lying?
 
My point is that people can dream up a law to cover anything no matter how dumb and stupid it is in reality. Didn't you ever read those books about stupid laws?

You mean like Obamacare where the politicians told us they would know what is in the bill AFTER it was passed?

I'm convinced there is no point in your dimwitted claims and you are only trying to remove any doubt what an uninformed hyper partisan dunce you are.
 
The RNC did until the courts stopped them....so I don't back away from that claim.....

I already posted the few states that did prosecute a bunch of democrats for voter fraud...so some are looking at least a little....
If you want to read the list again just ask...

And the RNC was targeting racial and ethnic minorities, what a shock... not.

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court has refused to lift a 30-year consent decree that bars the Republican National Committee from targeting racial and ethnic minorities in its efforts to end fraudulent voting...

The case began in 1981 when the RNC created a “national ballot security task force” that, among other things, undertook mailing campaigns targeted at black and Latino neighborhoods in New Jersey. If mailers were returned undelivered, party activists put those voters on a list to be challenged if they showed up to cast a ballot. In addition, the party was alleged to have hired off-duty law enforcement officers to “patrol” minority neighborhoods on election day.

The DNC sued the RNC in federal court, alleging its activities violated the Voting Rights Act and were intended to suppress voting among minorities. Rather than fight the charges in a trial, the RNC agreed to a consent decree promising to “refrain from undertaking any ballot security activities … directed toward [election] districts that have a substantial proportion of racial or ethnic minority populations.”


http://articles.latimes.com/2013/jan/14/news/la-pn-supreme-court-rnc-voter-fraud-20130114
 
Only someone as incredibly stupid as you could come up with the phony argument about so few safeguards, etc.

And the bottom line that none of you dullards has the stones to address is that there is nothing in the Constitution about needing photo ID to vote, and the only reason repubs are harping on it now is because their party's in the toilet.

Dear shit-for-brains; you have yet to prove any claims that voter ID is unconstitutional or that it prevents legal citizens from voting. Instead you keep running off at the mouth about things you know nothing about like the Constitution.

The Constitution is quite clear; you must be a citizen to vote. Demanding to see where it says you have to have a photo ID in the Constitution is about as disingenuous, dishonest and stupid as claiming proving citizenship is a burden on voters.

So why is proving it such a burden to you dunces on the left?
 
The DNC sued the RNC in federal court, alleging its activities violated the Voting Rights Act and were intended to suppress voting among minorities.

It's funny how the dem politicians say they're for the rights of the people, but than you have this individual mandate in Obamacare that takes away the peoples right to choose for themselves.
 
Google it, you freakish whack job know-it-all. I'm done doing all the heavy lifting for a nasty piece of goods like you.

In other words, you're just another clueless hyper partisan dunce who doesn't have a clue as to what you are arguing about. Thank you for illustrating it so clearly here on a thread you authored.

Carry on shit-for-brains.
 
Dear in sufferable dishonest boor, I read it and it is pretty much a faith based form anyone can fill out and lie on. As a matter of fact, it is ironic that two of the requested types of documentation was a drivers license or SS number, which anyone can forge, and/OR check the box saying you have neither.

Now gee, not being a dishonest insufferable partisan boor, I would say that just about anyone can vote in PA without proving they are a citizen entitled to vote. It just doesn't give me much confidence in the system.

So with that, how does attempting to improve the integrity of any voting system impede someone's priveledge to vote? Or are you going to avoid the honest answer and continue deflecting, obfuscating and lying?

Right, a faith-based form (ha ha) that still resulted in "the state acknowledg[ing] at the start that it knew of no cases of in-person voting fraud, the kind addressed by voter ID. "

But you keep the faith that somehow, somebody will uncover the droves of illegal voters in PA who are quietly making a mockery of our laws. </sarcasm>
 
Ahhh....finally.....speaking of throwing up their hands like a surrender monkey..........there it is.lol

The dunce was persistent; but when pressed enough for facts, the truth eventually creeps out. They have no facts and most of their claims are based on the emotional pabulum the DNC dishes out to these willful dunces.
 
Back
Top