JPP "Go Fund" My Love Connection

What are you, jealous?

I'm surprised you posted some stupid shit like this.

These two are grown ass men on here talking about each other's moms and that they are going to kick each other's ass as if they are teenagers. I thought maybe it was just a cover for a love connection. If you don't find it funny then fair enough.
 
Let's go back to your claim that I employ circular reasoning. That's a lie. I've challenged you on it. You have failed to respond.

Hence, you lied. Lying motherfucker.

Let's assume that is a lie, it is not, that is one lie. And that makes me the most prolific, lol.

I proved, as I've said several times, because you refused to explain your accusation about my intellect or whatever. If you had answered the question, you could have only said, because I say so. That is why you never answered the question. So stop lying that I didn't prove it and stop lying I am the most prolific because of one lie, which is not actually a lie.

LOL, poor stupid gomer, getting his ass handed to him yet again by another poster.
 
Let's assume that is a lie, it is not, that is one lie. And that makes me the most prolific, lol.

I proved, as I've said several times, because you refused to explain your accusation about my intellect or whatever. If you had answered the question, you could have only said, because I say so. That is why you never answered the question. So stop lying that I didn't prove it and stop lying I am the most prolific because of one lie, which is not actually a lie.

LOL, poor stupid gomer, getting his ass handed to him yet again by another poster.

You're a liar, douchebag, plain and simple. I've challenged you numerous times to provide an example of my circular reasoning. You haven't.

Other posts, you twist into something they are not and claim they are the truth. Either lies or illiteracy. Which do you prefer?
 
You're a liar, douchebag, plain and simple. I've challenged you numerous times to provide an example of my circular reasoning. You haven't.

Other posts, you twist into something they are not and claim they are the truth. Either lies or illiteracy. Which do you prefer?

Wow, after I just prove it, again, you actually type with a straight face I didn't. Why didn't you answer the question I repeatedly asked you?

Oh and nice try on th e other accusations. Link up or shut up. Every time I school you in something you claim I am lying or illiterate.

You literally are the worst debater on this forum, we'll, actually you are tied with Rune because you both go on a rampage when proven wrong.
 
Wow, after I just prove it, again, you actually type with a straight face I didn't. Why didn't you answer the question I repeatedly asked you?

Oh and nice try on th e other accusations. Link up or shut up. Every time I school you in something you claim I am lying or illiterate.

You literally are the worst debater on this forum, we'll, actually you are tied with Rune because you both go on a rampage when proven wrong.

Link up the circular reasoning claim, cunt.

Worst debater? lol

There is no debate with a lying simpleton like you. The game is over before you even suit up.
 
These two are grown ass men on here talking about each other's moms and that they are going to kick each other's ass as if they are teenagers. I thought maybe it was just a cover for a love connection. If you don't find it funny then fair enough.
But you're the only one who continued to try and get a date with him after initially being rejected.
 
But you're the only one who continued to try and get a date with him after initially being rejected.

I said state what sport he "played" in college on here. He claims he will only do it in person. Not sure how that's me trying to get a date.
 
Link up the circular reasoning claim, cunt.

Worst debater? lol

There is no debate with a lying simpleton like you. The game is over before you even suit up.

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...ht-it-was-a-good-speech&p=1856460#post1856460

Follow the posts. You first claimed I don't know what it means and then I asked you how do you know I don't know what it means. And you never answered, because if you did, it would be circular reasoning.

Dumbass.

But good job on claiming one lie, not a lie, makes me the most prolific liar on JPP. Guess what, that is a lie.
 
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...ht-it-was-a-good-speech&p=1856460#post1856460

Follow the posts. You first claimed I don't know what it means and then I asked you how do you know I don't know what it means. And you never answered, because if you did, it would be circular reasoning.

Dumbass.

But good job on claiming one lie, not a lie, makes me the most prolific liar on JPP. Guess what, that is a lie.

lol

Since you never presented an example of circular reasoning, bitch, we'll go with the fact that you have no fucking idea what it is. Then we will proceed with the fact that you never presented an example of me usung it. Why? Because I don't.

That makes you the liar, twatwaddle.
 
lol

Since you never presented an example of circular reasoning, bitch, we'll go with the fact that you have no fucking idea what it is. Then we will proceed with the fact that you never presented an example of me usung it. Why? Because I don't.

That makes you the liar, twatwaddle.

Here we go again, a whole month later and you're still fixated on it. Look tool, you didn't answer me how you know I don't know what circular reasoning is. That is my example, I could look up more, but why when you presented on right there.

How do you know I don't know what circular reasoning means? The only answer you can give is, because I say so. That is circular reasoning. If you could actually cite a concrete example of where I accused someone of using circular reasoning, say for example someone says: well 99% of scientist say so, and I said, that is circular reasoning. You would have a point. But you can't cite to anything other than your original claim that I don't know what circular reasoning means.

That, by definition, is circular reasoning
your blithering idiot. That is my example. How stupid or dishonest can you be?
 
Here we go again, a whole month later and you're still fixated on it. Look tool, you didn't answer me how you know I don't know what circular reasoning is. That is my example, I could look up more, but why when you presented on right there.

How do you know I don't know what circular reasoning means? The only answer you can give is, because I say so. That is circular reasoning. If you could actually cite a concrete example of where I accused someone of using circular reasoning, say for example someone says: well 99% of scientist say so, and I said, that is circular reasoning. You would have a point. But you can't cite to anything other than your original claim that I don't know what circular reasoning means.

That, by definition, is circular reasoning
your blithering idiot. That is my example. How stupid or dishonest can you be?

You're a fucking idiot and a liar. I can give you a CONCRETE example of you accusing me of circular logic. But you can't provide that example from me. That makes you a liar and I am calling you on that lie.

Put up or shut up, cunt.

BTW, you ignorant fuckwad, "99 % of scientists say so" is not circular reasoning. It's Argumentum ad populum.

Ignorant fuck
 
You're a fucking idiot and a liar. I can give you a CONCRETE example of you accusing me of circular logic. But you can't provide that example from me. That makes you a liar and I am calling you on that lie.

Put up or shut up, cunt.

BTW, you ignorant fuckwad, "99 % of scientists say so" is not circular reasoning. It's Argumentum ad populum.

Ignorant fuck

Seriously? This is retarded. You claimed I don't know what circular reasoning is, your only "proof" was your own reasoning, thus, you use circular reasoning.

As to your last sentence, duh, that is why I made the distinction. The fact you felt you had to explain to me, shows how dumb you are. You didn't even realize that was the distinction I made.

You will never let this go, I could say the sky is blue and you would argue something else. It is all you do. You refuse to accept you are wrong and think you know everything.

I was wrong, Rune is smarter than you.
 
Seriously? This is retarded. You claimed I don't know what circular reasoning is, your only "proof" was your own reasoning, thus, you use circular reasoning.

As to your last sentence, duh, that is why I made the distinction. The fact you felt you had to explain to me, shows how dumb you are. You didn't even realize that was the distinction I made.

You will never let this go, I could say the sky is blue and you would argue something else. It is all you do. You refuse to accept you are wrong and think you know everything.

I was wrong, Rune is smarter than you.

Lying cunt. My proof is your lack of providing an example. Find it and post it lying twatwaddle.
 
I have provided it,now, about a dozen times. You have yet to provide one lie (even assuming your one lie is accurate) of mine, let alone to be the most prolific liar on JPP. You're insane. You're an hysterical ninny. You can't prove a thing, and when a thing is proven to you, you just proclaim, nuh huh. You're a simpleton.

You're just an ankle biter.

GFY
 
I have provided it,now, about a dozen times. You have yet to provide one lie (even assuming your one lie is accurate) of mine, let alone to be the most prolific liar on JPP. You're insane. You're an hysterical ninny. You can't prove a thing, and when a thing is proven to you, you just proclaim, nuh huh. You're a simpleton.

You're just an ankle biter. D

GFY

Lying cunt. Find my post. Quote it.

Until then, you aren't Yaya. You are LC. Lying cunt.
 
Back
Top