Here we go again, a whole month later and you're still fixated on it. Look tool, you didn't answer me how you know I don't know what circular reasoning is. That is my example, I could look up more, but why when you presented on right there.
How do you know I don't know what circular reasoning means? The only answer you can give is, because I say so. That is circular reasoning. If you could actually cite a concrete example of where I accused someone of using circular reasoning, say for example someone says: well 99% of scientist say so, and I said, that is circular reasoning. You would have a point. But you can't cite to anything other than your original claim that I don't know what circular reasoning means.
That, by definition, is circular reasoning your blithering idiot. That is my example. How stupid or dishonest can you be?