Jordan Peterson: What is the post modern lens?

The above is just the most obvious of numerous words that Peterson uses when he speaks.
I have noticed this every time he does.
He uses larger/more, complicated alternatives of common words.

Now...I assume you Peterson lovers will claim - 'brilliant people speak this way'?
Wrong.


Here is the famous, theoretical physicist, Edward Teller - a STAGGERINGLY, brilliant man and 'the father of the hydrogen bomb'.
In the interview below - the speaks in ways that most people can understand.


Now, if he wanted, he could have used terms that almost, NO ONE on this board would 'get'.
But that would be pointless.
He knew this, so he didn't do it.

Plus? Think people?
How could brilliant professors teach their ignorant students if they laced their diatribes with words/phrases that the latter did not understand?
That would be ridiculous.

Even automotive 'technicians', sometimes 'dumb down' their conversations to their customers.
About the technical problems their vehicles are having.
Just so, said customers will understand them.
And I doubt most of them are as intelligent as Peterson claims to be.


Yet Peterson will not do this?
Thus, the conclusions about the reasons are obvious:

Either a) Peterson is so clueless, that he has no idea that most of his 'followers' do not know many of the terminologies he uses (which I doubt)?
b) Peterson is not smart enough to use 'common terminology' to explain more, complicated verbiage (I doubt that also)?
c) he is doing this deliberately to impress/intimidate his listeners.

Obviously, it is 'c'.
There is no other, logical reason.

Thus, he does not have the confidence in his words to speak 'plainly'.
He feels he must get people's respect?
Through the use of centuries old, con artists tricks.

And/or - he is just extremely insecure.
Neither bodes well.


Now, I realize, you Peterson lovers refuse to even consider that he is doing this.
So, save the excuses you pore out?
I ain't wasting my time reading the rambling's of closed-minded saps/incels about their 'professor'.

Good day.

You are straining soooo hard to come up with a complaint.
 
The above is just the most obvious of numerous words that Peterson uses when he speaks.
I have noticed this every time he does.
He uses larger/more, complicated alternatives of common words.

Now...I assume you Peterson lovers will claim - 'brilliant people speak this way'?
Wrong.


Here is the famous, theoretical physicist, Edward Teller - a STAGGERINGLY, brilliant man and 'the father of the hydrogen bomb'.
In the interview below - the speaks in ways that most people can understand.


Now, if he wanted, he could have used terms that almost, NO ONE on this board would 'get'.
But that would be pointless.
He knew this, so he didn't do it.

Plus? Think people?
How could brilliant professors teach their ignorant students if they laced their diatribes with words/phrases that the latter did not understand?
That would be ridiculous.

Even automotive 'technicians', sometimes 'dumb down' their conversations to their customers.
About the technical problems their vehicles are having.
Just so, said customers will understand them.
And I doubt most of them are as intelligent as Peterson claims to be.


Yet Peterson will not do this?
Thus, the conclusions about the reasons are obvious:

Either a) Peterson is so clueless, that he has no idea that most of his 'followers' do not know many of the terminologies he uses (which I doubt)?
b) Peterson is not smart enough to use 'common terminology' to explain more, complicated verbiage (I doubt that also)?
c) he is doing this deliberately to impress/intimidate his listeners.

Obviously, it is 'c'.
There is no other, logical reason.

Thus, he does not have the confidence in his words to speak 'plainly'.
He feels he must get people's respect?
Through the use of centuries old, con artists tricks.

And/or - he is just extremely insecure.
Neither bodes well.


Now, I realize, you Peterson lovers refuse to even consider that he is doing this.
So, save the excuses you pore out?
I ain't wasting my time reading the rambling's of closed-minded saps/incels about their 'professor'.

Good day.

Ok so you're not a fan, we get it, now shut the fuck up. Is that clear enough for you? If, for no other reason, I love the man because feminazis, pseudo intellectuals, Regressives and cultural Marxists hate his guts. In addition, Camille Paglia loves the man and there's no finer endorsement in my book.

"Wokeness gives people a shield to be mean and cruel, armored in false virtue."

- Elon Musk
 
Last edited:
Ok so you're not a fan, we get it, now shut the fuck up. Is that clear enough for you? If, for no other reason, I love the man as feminazis, pseudo intellectuals and cultural Marxists hate his guts.

"Wokeness gives people a shield to be mean and cruel, armored in false virtue."

- Elon Musk

Him and Tucker must go immediately!
 
Jordan Peterson is constantly encouraging everyone to do better at everything, to include language, and he works to be as precise as possible so that we can understand what he is saying....but leave it to the WOKE to make this into a flaw.
 
I have been noticing in the YouTube comments lately Jordans enemies jamming him for his fashion sense and weight...that is how desperate they are.
 
Jordan Peterson is constantly encouraging everyone to do better at everything, to include language, and he works to be as precise as possible so that we can understand what he is saying....but leave it to the WOKE to make this into a flaw.

Peterson absolutely boils the Progressives' piss, you can see that on here with Rana, Salty and Madwitch. May he always do so, he is the dog's bollocks.
 
Last edited:
Peterson absolutely boils the Progressives' piss, you can see that on here with Rana and Madwitch. May he always do so, he is the dog's bollocks.

He simply refuses to shut up.

If this Revolution is not put down there will eventually be a bullet with his name on it if he were to live this long, we know where this train goes, everytime.
 
I have been noticing in the YouTube comments lately Jordans enemies jamming him for his fashion sense and weight...that is how desperate they are.

McRocket is using Doctor Strangelove as an exemplar for clear speech and behaviour. Teller hated Oppenheimer because he wouldn't have anything to do with a hydrogen bomb and he never forgave him. and ensured that the paranoid bastards in the 50s back stabbed and had all his security clearances removed.
 
Last edited:
A postmodern lens is at its simplest, a use of the historian's fallacy to evaluate all of what has come before against current values. It is a means, for all intents, rejecting most of the past, and certainly anything that the postmodernist disagrees with.
 
McRocket is using Doctor Strangelove as an exemplar for clear speech. Teller hated Oppenheimer because he wouldn't have anything to do with a hydrogen bomb and he never forgave him. and ensured that the paranoid bastards in the 50s back stabbed and had all his security clearances removed.

They will say anything, and be Dicks the entire time as they do it.
 
A postmodern lens is at its simplest, a use of the historian's fallacy to evaluate all of what has come before against current values. It is a means, for all intents, rejecting most of the past, and certainly anything that the postmodernist disagrees with.

They condemn the past without ever bothering to learn about it, humans are to be remade fit for UTOPIA, we will have the New Human, what came before is irrelevant.
 
A postmodern lens is at its simplest, a use of the historian's fallacy to evaluate all of what has come before against current values. It is a means, for all intents, rejecting most of the past, and certainly anything that the postmodernist disagrees with.

It is also called Presentism for refusing to evaluate history in its proper context rather than applying the social mores and attitudes of the present.
 
Last edited:
It is also called Presentism for refusing to evaluate history in its proper context rather than applying the social mores and attitudes of the time.

They dont know anything about the past nor do they want to, their fantasies are all they have.....through willpower.
 
It is also called Presentism for refusing to evaluate history in its proper context rather than applying the social mores and attitudes of the time.

That's the reverse of the Historian's Fallacy. Both only ensure that the users don't know what the fuck they're talking about.
 
Back
Top