Johnny Depp - "When was the last time an actor assassinated a President?"

"In 2009 journalist Ronald Kessler reported that Obama received 400 percent more death threats than his predecessor.[10] Later that year, the Secret Service stated that the volume of threats against Obama was "comparable to that under George W. Bush and Bill Clinton."[11]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assassination_threats_against_Barack_Obama



"the Secret Service stated that the volume of threats against Obama was "comparable to that under George W. Bush and Bill Clinton."
 
8 fucking years and all you got is Ted Nugent. We're only 6 months into Trump's presidency and we already have a Reichstag Fire coup attempt ... and a State Media working 24/7 to unseat a duly elected president. :palm:


"Only ted nugent," I showed you where President Obama set the standard, and then gave you six sources showing that it is not "coup attempt' nor germane to Republicans or Trump, your just denying the facts, hate to say it, but your just blinded by your sun

 
"Only ted nugent," I showed you where President Obama set the standard, and then gave you six sources showing that it is not "coup attempt' nor germane to Republicans or Trump, your just denying the facts, hate to say it, but your just blinded by your sun

I'm not going to click on a link just because YOU posted it. You're NOT a reliable source. You already proved that.

Prove President Trump shot anyone! I dare you!
 
So if it is "fake news" it should be easy for you to show us something that negates that FACT, otherwise, your just making your claim up, fortunately this ain't talk radio, you have to prove what you say

Should we wait?
Wait for what....a "supposed" fact to be NEGATED? Logically, intelligently and with just a bit of common sense injected into the cognitive thought process....its common knowledge that a FACT is never subject to be NEGATED or it was never a fact in the first place.

I know that you might want documentation but its not possible to demonstrate a negative to be true or untrue...something that was generated by subjective opinion...thus I call Bullshit where bullshit is evident from the probable numeric impossibility of the supposed reported threats

Right.....they don't have to document the claimed 86,400 death threats....but others have to disprove something that was never documented. Now must we wonder why they have lost over 900 government seats, the executive branch, the judicial branch and both houses of congress over the past few years? FYI: a negative can never be proven. The negative....evidence of the outrageous claim. It would be a simple thing to present the number of prosecutions that have resulted in the supposed 86,400 direct threats on the life of a sitting POTUS. But on the other hand....if it were true...would that not suggest that the said president in question was the most disliked president in US HISTORY, if it/him/shim was actually threatened over 86,400 times....the supposed most in US HISTORY? Subjectively speaking of course. One can correlate anything he/she wishes when all that's presented is subjective bullshit.

The lesson for today. The subjective generated by opinion (the space between the ears) and the objective...a display of evidence that can be tested for truth.
 
Last edited:
It is somehow fitting that the Democrats are drawing inspiration from John Wilkes Booth to deal with our modern day Lincoln, Trump.

Freeing and repatriating our modern day slaves is even the issue they are most upset about.

I guess "this is what democracy looks like" for liberals.

Please tell me, who are the modern day slaves?
 
"In 2009 journalist Ronald Kessler reported that Obama received 400 percent more death threats than his predecessor.[10] Later that year, the Secret Service stated that the volume of threats against Obama was "comparable to that under George W. Bush and Bill Clinton."[11]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assassination_threats_against_Barack_Obama

Was that a FACT that you just "negated" or was the claim of 86,400 death threats....REAL FAKE NEWS?

Does that "subjectively" mean that Barry Soetoro was 400x more disliked than it/his/shim's predecessors? Or are we to conclude that the reporter is "reporting" truth....but the CIA reports a "comparable" number of threats to other sitting presidents are lies? Again it must be pointed out that simply because someone "reports" something and claims that its a FACT....does not make that report true. Facts are testable and objectively "demonstrable"...Subjective Bullshit.... If such were evident and could be used objectively.....Hillary Clinton would have won the election by a 90% landslide victory. :)
 
Last edited:
Depp is saying he's going to assassinate the POTUS after he wins the war against the Dems. The Don will be the new Lincoln.
 
First it's Kathy Griffin and Phil Montag, ... now it's multi millionaire, liberal atheist, wife beater Johnny Depp :palm:
No doubt he's a wife beater but he's no multi millionaire. He'd have to make 3 more Pirates blockbuster hits and live in a trailer house to avoid bankruptcy.
He's part of the dim base, hollywierd , along with Portland tranny antifas where it's considered perfectly normal to openly piss, defecate, and masturbate on the streets of their downtown.
It really doesn't matter if Trump's approval rating is 0%, their base make him look like the greatest president ever.
 
Charming, not only is that pretty disgusting but you can't even spell masturbate correctly.

Sent from my iPhone 25S Turbo
I believed that he apologized, no doubt be cause the consequences of his actions were spelt out to him in no uncertain terms.

Sent from my iPhone 25S Turbo
 
Back
Top