Jobs report shows increase of 517,000 in January

Truth Detector said:
Another pointless post from the forums pet halfwit. Run along halfwit, you add NOTHING to any thread, other than remove any doubt what a moron you really are.
Click to expand...

My dear, you were so sure the jobs report was wrong, terribly overstated, and it would definitely be revised down.
Well you are fucking wrong as usual!
 
floridafan said:
My dear, you were so sure the jobs report was wrong, terribly overstated, and it would definitely be revised down.
Well you are fucking wrong as usual!
Click to expand...

I will be right as usual. Meanwhile, you still look like a triggered, lying leftist jerk on steroids. Bravo!
 
Truth Detector said:
Really? What regulations would you be talking about? Apparently, you are making up your laughably stupid bullshit as you go.
Click to expand...
Here are the regulations. It includes a reference to the US Code where the law can be found.
https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-20/chapter-V/part-639
It would appear the federal requirement is a 60 day notice.
These companies don't have to abide by goofy California regulations except where those employees reside. So what is your point? These are not going to lead to massive layoffs? Dunce.
Click to expand...
They do have to abide by Federal regulations that I just linked to.

I clearly stated that inflation warps those numbers, and they constantly revise them as the LINK has shown. I know you are desperate to defend your stupidity for voting for this incompetent dunce of a President, but spare us your dishonest bullshit.
Click to expand...
You stated this..
the growth in GDP is somewhat distorted due to increased costs due to the massive inflation we have seen over the last two years

GDP growth can't be distorted by inflation if inflation is subtracted from the number.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
Here are the regulations. It includes a reference to the US Code where the law can be found.
https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-20/chapter-V/part-639
It would appear the federal requirement is a 60 day notice.
Click to expand...

You fucking moron:

Scope of these regulations. These regulations establish basic definitions and rules for giving notice, implementing the provisions of WARN. The Department's objective is to establish clear principles and broad guidelines which can be applied in specific circumstances. However, the Department recognizes that Federal rulemaking cannot address the multitude of industry and company-specific situations in which advance notice will be given.

:palm:

Poor Richard Saunders said:
They do have to abide by Federal regulations that I just linked to.
Click to expand...

Really? Where does the Constitution say that halfwit? They only have to abide by Federal requirements as a GOVERNMENT contractor doing GOVERNMENT work. READ the link you posted halfwit.

Poor Richard Saunders said:
You stated this..
the growth in GDP is somewhat distorted due to increased costs due to the massive inflation we have seen over the last two years

GDP growth can't be distorted by inflation if inflation is subtracted from the number.
Click to expand...

Yes, it can. You're a halfwit to believe that government data is flawless and accurate. It seldom is which is why....wait for it....it is CONSTANTLY REVISED and UPDATED.

Dunce.
 
Truth Detector said:
You fucking moron:

Scope of these regulations. These regulations establish basic definitions and rules for giving notice, implementing the provisions of WARN. The Department's objective is to establish clear principles and broad guidelines which can be applied in specific circumstances. However, the Department recognizes that Federal rulemaking cannot address the multitude of industry and company-specific situations in which advance notice will be given.

:palm:



Really? Where does the Constitution say that halfwit? They only have to abide by Federal requirements as a GOVERNMENT contractor doing GOVERNMENT work. READ the link you posted halfwit.



Dunce.
Click to expand...

I did read it. Clearly you didn't.

§ 639.1 Purpose and scope.

(a) Purpose of WARN. The Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act (WARN or the Act) provides protection to workers, their families and communities by requiring employers to provide notification 60 calendar days in advance of plant closings and mass layoffs. Advance notice provides workers and their families some transition time to adjust to the prospective loss of employment, to seek and obtain alternative jobs and, if necessary, to enter skill training or retraining that will allow these workers to successfully compete in the job market. WARN also provides for notice to State dislocated worker units so that dislocated worker assistance can be promptly provided.
Click to expand...
Nothing there about it only applying to federal contractors.
§ 639.3 Definitions.

(a) Employer.

(1) The term “employer” means any business enterprise that employs -

(i) 100 or more employees, excluding part-time employees; or

(ii) 100 or more employees, including part-time employees, who in the aggregate work at least 4,000 hours per week, exclusive of hours of overtime.
Click to expand...
It doesn't apply to small businesses but if a business is laying off 1,000 workers and that is 10% of their work force then it clearly applies to them.

§ 639.4 Who must give notice?

Section 3(a) of WARN states that “an employer shall not order a plant closing or mass layoff until the end of a 60-day period after the employer serves written notice of such an order * * *.” Therefore, an employer who is anticipating carrying out a plant closing or mass layoff is required to give notice to affected employees or their representative(s), the State dislocated worker unit and the chief elected official of a unit of local government. (See definitions in § 639.3 of this part.)
Click to expand...

(d) WARN enforcement. Enforcement of WARN will be through the courts, as provided in section 5 of the statute. Employees, their representatives and units of local government may initiate civil actions against employers believed to be in violation of § 3 of the Act. The Department of Labor has no legal standing in any enforcement action and, therefore, will not be in a position to issue advisory opinions of specific cases. The Department will provide assistance in understanding these regulations and may revise them from time to time as may be necessary.
Click to expand...
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
I did read it. Clearly you didn't.


Nothing there about it only applying to federal contractors.

It doesn't apply to small businesses but if a business is laying off 1,000 workers and that is 10% of their work force then it clearly applies to them.
Click to expand...

It's unconstitutional and unenforceable dumbass. :palm:
 
floridafan said:
OK, that will give me another opportunity to tell you how fucking ignorant you are. Looking forward........
Click to expand...

flail-panic.gif
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top