Jimmy Kimmel's Political Hackery : He isn't just a comedian

Fascinating, given that since Reagan the whole schtick of the right wing Republicans has been to "get the government off the people's back". Hell, the even got the Fairness Doctrine removed, claiming it was gov't interference in getting the conservative view equal time.

So now all that goes out the window as a disgusting wanna-be authoritarian sends his appointed lackeys in government out to censor or silence ANY criticism of him or his administration's policies/actions.

Ahhh, fascism 101- soon brought to you by DJT productions at a town near you.

I certainly agree that the FCC Chair went too far, which is a point that the author of the article I referenced in the opening post made as well. He just decided to focus on the mistakes that Kimmel made over the years and how that rightfully angered a fair amount of people.
 
Personally, I still like some stuff from John Oliver and Colbert. If they have a viewpoint I don't agree with, I can always just stop watching. I've seen and liked some of Robin Williams' and Carlin's stuff and I've certainly heard of Bill Hicks, but not sure I've ever seen him. The last 2 comedians you mentioned I don't know.
John Oliver has won numerous Emmys. The writing on his show is amazing!
 
How can you type this shit?

Not off to a good start -.- I'll let it pass this time.

Since Murdoch started Fox and all the right wing gnus, all the time came, balance has left the building. You rightys cry about balance, but from your deep Trump pit, you cannot see it.

Surely you know by now that I'm not a fan of Trump. As Jimmy Dore put it in a comedy skit that I've linked to below, you don't have to be a fan of Trump to recognize the mistakes the left has made during Covid. The skit in question:
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0PM67hjv4iM
 
Yep, like I said, fake outrage. I asked both @TOP and @zymurgy today that if what Kimmel did was so horrendous, why was it ok for Don Jr. to post a pick of underwear and a hammer on twitter and taunt the Pelosi's after Paul was almost killed.

They could not run away fast enough. trumptards do not like to be reminded what horrible dishonest hypocrites they are.

I don't know about it being fake outrage, but I think Greg Collard, the author of the article I referenced in the opening post may have been on to something when he said that it's not just what he said about Kirk. Honestly, I think he's said far worse in the past. I'll just quote Collard's concluding remarks where he gets into that:
**
There are legitimate questions and concerns about the role of the FCC and the Trump administration’s influence in Disney’s decision to put Kimmel on hiatus. This isn’t about that, and there is already plenty of coverage and appropriate scrutiny of that decision.

But what’s not being addressed enough is whether conservative outrage over Kimmel’s monologue is understandable. Unequivically, the answer is yes — but it’s not just about what he said Monday: that “the MAGA gang” was “desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to score political points from it.”

It’s about what Kimmel has been saying and doing for years. He is a tool of the Democratic Party. He doesn’t just use his show to push his politics, but tells people outright how they should vote. This 19-minute video from last October, titled “A Special Monologue for the Republican in Your Life,” is the height of obnoxiousness. He asks people to show the video to their Republican friends or relatives in an effort to convince them not to vote for Trump. To quote the retired football player formerly known as Chad Ochocinco, “Child, please.”

Then there are other bits, “joking” that people who don’t have the Covid vaccine shouldn’t get treated for a heart attack, implying that people should continue vandalizing Teslas, his ass-kissing of Democratic office holders on his show and letting people know they have his endorsement. He even helped what was then the Biden-Harris campaign in 2024 raise $30 million in one night by moderating a discussion with Biden and former President Barack Obama. These and other examples are in the video at the top of this post, which was also included in “America This Week.”

He has the right to do all this, of course (although Walter Kirn makes a compelling argument on ATW that he has violated the terms of an FCC license to broadcast on the public’s airwaves). My point is, the conservative public isn’t just pushing back against a simple comedian. They are pushing back against a partisan who has continually put them down. That’s politics, a game that Kimmel has willingly played.

**

Source:
 
Exactly. Now, having said, that, it's open season on taunting Democrats - just listen to all the horrible insults coming from asswipe Fox News personalities. For trumptards it's "rules for thee but not for me".

I think the last time I watched Fox News was when Tucker Carlson was still a part of that network. I'm certainly not always a fan of his work, but I thought he was alright when he talked about Russia, Covid and vaccines.
 
I don't know about it being fake outrage, but I think Greg Collard, the author of the article I referenced in the opening post may have been on to something when he said that it's not just what he said about Kirk. Honestly, I think he's said far worse in the past. I'll just quote Collard's concluding remarks where he gets into that:
**
There are legitimate questions and concerns about the role of the FCC and the Trump administration’s influence in Disney’s decision to put Kimmel on hiatus. This isn’t about that, and there is already plenty of coverage and appropriate scrutiny of that decision.

But what’s not being addressed enough is whether conservative outrage over Kimmel’s monologue is understandable. Unequivically, the answer is yes — but it’s not just about what he said Monday: that “the MAGA gang” was “desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to score political points from it.”

It’s about what Kimmel has been saying and doing for years. He is a tool of the Democratic Party. He doesn’t just use his show to push his politics, but tells people outright how they should vote. This 19-minute video from last October, titled “A Special Monologue for the Republican in Your Life,” is the height of obnoxiousness. He asks people to show the video to their Republican friends or relatives in an effort to convince them not to vote for Trump. To quote the retired football player formerly known as Chad Ochocinco, “Child, please.”

Then there are other bits, “joking” that people who don’t have the Covid vaccine shouldn’t get treated for a heart attack, implying that people should continue vandalizing Teslas, his ass-kissing of Democratic office holders on his show and letting people know they have his endorsement. He even helped what was then the Biden-Harris campaign in 2024 raise $30 million in one night by moderating a discussion with Biden and former President Barack Obama. These and other examples are in the video at the top of this post, which was also included in “America This Week.”

He has the right to do all this, of course (although Walter Kirn makes a compelling argument on ATW that he has violated the terms of an FCC license to broadcast on the public’s airwaves). My point is, the conservative public isn’t just pushing back against a simple comedian. They are pushing back against a partisan who has continually put them down. That’s politics, a game that Kimmel has willingly played.

**

Source:
No, Kimmel does NOT tell people how to vote. That's trumptard fever-dream bullshit. He uses satire to describe trump and his actions because trump's actions demand and deserve it.

I'm so fucking sick of this right-wing victim culture. They call us "word police" while scrubbing text books of any trace of slavery. They want to dominate from the minority, plain and simple. That's what January 6th was all about. trumptards decided democracy just doesn't work for them anymore so they're just gonna take what they want. - Same thing that's happening now with the canceling of opposing voices by the trump cult.
 
I certainly agree that the FCC Chair went too far, which is a point that the author of the article I referenced in the opening post made as well. He just decided to focus on the mistakes that Kimmel made over the years and how that rightfully angered a fair amount of people.
Actually, he presented skewed hyperbole, ignoring things like this one example: www.gbnews.com/politics/us/jimmy-kimmel-joe-biden-hilarious-game-president-age-mocked

I remember him taking shots at Obama and candidate Hillary Clinton as well

Right wing wonks are pissed because in the last 25 years the GOP has had such preposterous figures as The Shrub (G.W. Bush) and Cheeto Jeezus (Trump) were a living gold mine for late night talk shows. There is no comparison.
 
I think the last time I watched Fox News was when Tucker Carlson was still a part of that network. I'm certainly not always a fan of his work, but I thought he was alright when he talked about Russia, Covid and vaccines.
DITTO.....and except for Gutfeld when I was visiting Corpus I never watched anything else on Fox.....as for any other TV news cable or otherwise we are talking decades.
 
I think the last time I watched Fox News was when Tucker Carlson was still a part of that network. I'm certainly not always a fan of his work, but I thought he was alright when he talked about Russia, Covid and vaccines.
You "thought he was alright when he talked about Russia"? Ok. LOL.

What Tucker did do recently was bash the trump administration for their quest to cancel "hate speech". Why? Because hate speech and lying about the opposition is how Tucker makes his living.
 
Sometimes. I think his takes on immigration are great, and he's done some good take downs of Trump and nasty corporations. I'm not a fan of his take on vaccines, but then, everyone has flaws.
Yes, I get from the couple of your last post that you are an anti-vaxxer. Sorry to see that - for me - I get my medical advice from my doctor, not from heroin attacks appointed by trump.
 
How can you type this shit? Since Murdoch started Fox and all the right wing gnus, all the time came, balance has left the building. You rightys cry about balance, but from your deep Trump pit, you cannot see it. In your world, it is all right all the time. In Kimmel's world, he pushes what he thinks is country saving views. He believes and almost all intelligent people do, that Trump is a threat to the American experiment. What can he balance that with? He sees Trump is a corrupt buffoon. He is . But how do you balance that with anything? Trump does not have a clever side, an honest side, and an unselfish side. He does not have a smart side. His 5th grade vocabulary and anti science views cannot be balanced.
Trump is all that wrapped in a dictator's clothes.
He buys into the right-wing crap that Democrats need to be nice while Republicans can let 'er rip. It's the common theme I've seen from all trump-worshipers since this Charlie Kirk tragedy happened.
 
Yeah, yeah, I know. Pundits should not be political hacks unless they're on Gutfeld! Then, for some odd reason with you Dem-bashers it's ok, because it sooths your white-hot irrational fear and hatred of the Democratic party.

That your so blind to your own hypocrisy - I'm used to it, no worries. But - I'm not going to stop pointing it out!
It's like you can't understand English. If you think you cannot agree with someone you only read like every other word or something and fill in the rest with your own nonsense and think you make sense.

My point was some comedians that are funny are partisan hacks, and I even like laughing at crap I think is absurdly insane, talent really is talent, John Stewart is funny. You get from that what you "feel" which is "that Damocles guy, he only likes Gutfield..."

Personally I'm stunned that some dude on a pay channel is beating the network TV channels, every danged one of them. But I have literally never watched the show. Though I may start, his ratings are something that makes me think he may be funny.
 
It's like you can't understand English. If you think you cannot agree with someone you only read like every other word or something and fill in the rest with your own nonsense and think you make sense.

My point was some comedians that are funny are partisan hacks, and I even like laughing at crap I think is absurdly insane, talent really is talent, John Stewart is funny. You get from that what you "feel" which is "that Damocles guy, he only likes Gutfield..."

Personally I'm stunned that some dude on a pay channel is beating the network TV channels, every danged one of them. But I have literally never watched the show. Though I may start, his ratings are something that makes me think he may be funny.
No. I understand you fine. I read every word. You don't think Kimmel's satirizing the trump administration is funny. You called it "nothing but political hackery". What you fail to understand is that millions of other people do think Kimmel is funny, not only that but his confirmation of what trump's saying and doing is a comfort to many because they like to believe they're not crazy - that they really are seeing masked thugs in unmarked cars tackling grandmas and bus boys in our city streets.

Your problem isn't partisanship. It's an inability to empathize with millions of Americans horrified at what trump has done and is yet to do.
 
No. I understand you fine. I read every word. You don't think Kimmel's satirizing the trump administration is funny. You called it "nothing but political hackery". What you fail to understand is that millions of other people do think Kimmel is funny, not only that but his confirmation of what trump's saying and doing is a comfort to many because they like to believe they're not crazy - that they really are seeing masked thugs in unmarked cars tackling grandmas and bus boys in our city streets.

Your problem isn't partisanship. It's an inability to empathize with millions of Americans horrified at what trump has done and is yet to do.
I don't think he satires, I think he just spouts insults, delivered without a setup and his sense of timing blows wind. I suspect that you know what I mean, but want to defend him desperately. You know you were one of the 75% of viewers he lost since 2013.
 
I don't think he satires, I think he just spouts insults, delivered without a setup and his sense of timing blows wind. I suspect that you know what I mean, but want to defend him desperately. You know you were one of the 75% of viewers he lost since 2013.
I watched YouTubes of Kimmel every once in awhile - he was fine. His style is different than his peers but I didn't find it offputting - perhaps because I agree with his takes on trump and you don't? In any event, I'm not defending Kimmel in particular but speaking out against the cancelling of speech by political opponents just because people in power can. I'm speaking out against more opposing voices yet to be silenced because trump can get away with it. I'm actually speaking in favor of the 1A, considered so precious I thought, by the trump cult as well - but obviously the cult means just free speech for them.
 
DITTO.....and except for Gutfeld when I was visiting Corpus I never watched anything else on Fox.....as for any other TV news cable or otherwise we are talking decades.
Seriously, can you tell something about Gutfelds comic history prior to his deplorable antics and piss-poor comedic attempts on Fox News? Was he a "stand-up", a writer or columnist? Inquiring minds want to know.
 
I don't think he satires, I think he just spouts insults, delivered without a setup and his sense of timing blows wind. I suspect that you know what I mean, but want to defend him desperately. You know you were one of the 75% of viewers he lost since 2013.
Interesting. Whom do you think gives proper "satire" on late night talk shows, or any internet platform for that matter?
 
Interesting. Whom do you think gives proper "satire" on late night talk shows, or any internet platform for that matter?
I gave the example of John Stewart at least three times in this thread alone. I think the man is funny. Colbert is better as a set up man, he'd set it up, Stewart would hit it out of the park... then he was alone and all he was was Olbermann, with more angry gestures...

As for "late night"... I stopped watching it when it became "hate night TV"... There's a reason I've never seen Gutfeld, it isn't because I've been desperately seeking late night comedy like it was a church or something.

(Because soon you will use it, here are a few extemporaneous instances of the word "Chronology"... chronology, the chronology, chronology, chronology, and a couple "of the posts"... of the posts, of the posts... feel free to spread them around often, even when there is no actual chronology).
 
Back
Top