JFK unmasked

Funny how Julian Assange is now a favorite of the right, kinda like Russia and the National Debt, first they were against it now their for it, guess their convictions depend upon who occupies the White House

The funny thing? Look at who was pardoned for treason. I find it very revealing.....the Shim responsible for allowing the very existence of Wikileaks....MANNING, was pardoned by whom? Was it Mr. Trump? LMAO Now the party that allowed and pardoned the leaks are bitching about the emails becoming public knowledge.
 
Dick Cheney is one man and said that once, as far as I know. Anchovies claimed that the "right" is now for deficits. I'm not, so anchovies lied.





Times have changed since those days, poor little history major. Didn't they tell you in junior college?



They were? Says who?

BTW, I don't recall anyone mentioning Chelsea in this thread. How come you included it?

You are not "the right," seeing as how you have spent more time trolling as a leftist than as a right-wing populist.

The current Russian head-of-state is a former KGB operative of the USSR.

Any mention of Assange and Wikileaks makes his contributors relevant to the discussion.
 
The funny thing? Look at who was pardoned for treason. I find it very revealing.....the Shim responsible for allowing the very existence of Wikileaks....MANNING, was pardoned by whom? Was it Mr. Trump? LMAO Now the party that allowed and pardoned the leaks are bitching about the emails becoming public knowledge.

The left hasn't (hadn't) given a fuck about Russia for at least the past 40 years. That is not the argument that is being presented, with regard to Trumptards and their position of Russia.
 
You are not "the right," seeing as how you have spent more time trolling as a leftist than as a right-wing populist.

Yet you were willing to pretend that one utterance by one man represents the views of the entire right, poor little history major.

The current Russian head-of-state is a former KGB operative of the USSR.

"Former" being the operative word, poor little history major. You may have noticed that the USSR ceased to exist some time ago. The world has moved on, little history major, except for you and your leftists pals, apparently. Putin doesn't represent the Cold War era of Soviet-US relations any more than Abe represents the Japanese Empire of the past.

Any mention of Assange and Wikileaks makes his contributors relevant to the discussion.

So you say, poor little history major. I see no relevance to Chelsea in this context based on your assertion. I suspect that you masturbate to pictures of Mr. Manning and that was reason for your mention in this thread.
 
Yet you were willing to pretend that one utterance by one man represents the views of the entire right, poor little history major.



"Former" being the operative word, poor little history major. You may have noticed that the USSR ceased to exist some time ago. The world has moved on, little history major, except for you and your leftists pals, apparently. Putin doesn't represent the Cold War era of Soviet-US relations any more than Abe represents the Japanese Empire of the past.



So you say, poor little history major. I see no relevance to Chelsea in this context based on your assertion. I suspect that you masturbate to pictures of Mr. Manning and that was reason for your mention in this thread.

Was Dick Cheney the VP and nominee of the Republican Party, or was he not?

Is Putin the "current" Russian head-of-state, or not? Were Edward Snowden and Bradley Manning contributors to Wikileaks, or were they not?
 
Was Dick Cheney the VP and nominee of the Republican Party, or was he not?

Is Putin the "current" Russian head-of-state, or not? Were Edward Snowden and Bradley Manning contributors to Wikileaks, or were they not?

Irrelevant, for the reasons previously stated, poor little history major.

Don't you need to go watch other men piss or something?
 
Irrelevant, for the reasons previously stated, poor little history major.

Don't you need to go watch other men piss or something?

Nope, you fail. In the end, the rule of message boards is that Real People > Trolls. This would be true even if you were debating Dixie about the value of 1/3.
 
Was Dick Cheney the VP and nominee of the Republican Party, or was he not?

Is Putin the "current" Russian head-of-state, or not? Were Edward Snowden and Bradley Manning contributors to Wikileaks, or were they not?

Has there been "one" criminal activity that has been proven against Mr. Trump concerning "wink, wink" Russian Collusion and the 2016 campaign? One? If not....what is the point? SOUR GRAPES. Even the Manafort indictment had more ties to the Clinton campaign and Foreign Collusion with Influence peddling/money laundering from years before the election (the Podesta Firm) than anything investigated to date....a firm that has now closed its doors. Those are the FACTS now in evidence.

If you have objective evidence proving criminal activity by Trump, Bush, Cheney, or anyone that you have subjectively with bigorty charged with criminal activity present the objective, testable, reproducible evidence. You have none....or several things would be apparent. After years of FBI investigation ranging from 2009 to date....someone besides Manafort with direct ties to the Podesta Boys would have been indicted and charged with criminal activity and Queen Hillary would now be directing her minions at the DOJ.

This is what often happens when a "made up crime" is investigated......it uncovers REAL CRIMINAL ACTIVITY. It will not be weeks but days before the left leaning media and the good ole boy's and gals on the hill will begin screaming....SHUT IT DOWN, SHUT IT DOWN. But...its to late. Why? They do not know just whose names are on those sealed indictments.

There is already enough evidence to launch another investigation into the Clinton Email scandal and the Uranium One scandal...what else will be uncovered? With Trump having the constitutional authority to point the DOJ at anyone he commands....do you think, maybe, just maybe....he will leave one stone uncovered by those who began this dog and phony show? Comey, most certainly will go to prison as Mr. Trump had the authority and now a clear reason (he drafted Clinton's pardon of the email scandal even before he investigated her) to dismiss him along with his under oath confession that he leaked information that was classified to the press. There was no crime to investigate in relation to Comney's firing...thus there is no authority to gain access to anything related to that firing as it was lawful and constitutional as demonstrated going all the way back to the Arron Burr case....where the president of the united states pointed the DOJ like an attack dog.

Clinton is history along with her hubby......and anyone found taking a bribe in relation to the Uranium scandal. Let the show continue.
 
Last edited:
Threedee is a failure in life whose only dubious "achievement" is derailing threads.

In this case, he wants to make a thread about JFK into a thread about himself, apparently.
 
Has there been "one" criminal activity that has been proven against Mr. Trump concerning "wink, wink" Russian Collusion and the 2016 campaign? One? If not....what is the point? SOUR GRAPES. Even the Manafort indictment had more ties to the Clinton campaign and Foreign Collusion with Influence peddling/money laundering from years before the election (the Podesta Firm) than anything investigated to date....a firm that has now closed its doors. Those are the FACTS now in evidence.

If you have objective evidence proving criminal activity by Trump, Bush, Cheney, or anyone that you have subjectively with bigorty charged with criminal activity present the objective, testable, reproducible evidence. You have none....or several things would be apparent. After years of FBI investigation ranging from 2009 to date....someone besides Manafort with direct ties to the Podesta Boys would have been indicted and charged with criminal activity and Queen Hillary would now be directing her minions at the DOJ.

This is what often happens when a "made up crime" is investigated......it uncovers REAL CRIMINAL ACTIVITY. It will not be weeks but days before the left leaning media and the good ole boy's and gals on the hill will begin screaming....SHUT IT DOWN, SHUT IT DOWN. But...its to late. Why? They do not know just whose names are on those sealed indictments.

There is already enough evidence to launch another investigation into the Clinton Email scandal and the Uranium One scandal...what else will be uncovered? With Trump having the constitutional authority to point the DOJ at anyone he commands....do you think, maybe, just maybe....he will leave one stone uncovered by those who began this dog and phony show? Comey, most certainly will go to prison as Mr. Trump had the authority and now a clear reason (he drafted Clinton's pardon of the email scandal even before he investigated her) to dismiss him along with his under oath confession that he leaked information that was classified to the press. There was no crime to investigate in relation to Comney's firing...thus there is no authority to gain access to anything related to that firing as it was lawful and constitutional as demonstrated going all the way back to the Arron Burr case....where the president of the united states pointed the DOJ like an attack dog.

Clinton is history along with her hubby......and anyone found taking a bribe in relation to the Uranium scandal. Let the show continue.

Yeah, I wasn't talking about Russian collusion, and nothing I say about Douchebag Donald ever has anything to do with the Clintons. I am referring to all of the fawning over Putin and his regime for the past couple of years by Trumptards.
 
Threedee is a failure in life whose only dubious "achievement" is derailing threads.

In this case, he wants to make a thread about JFK into a thread about himself, apparently.

Well, I'm not Julian Assange, Edward Snowden, Bradley Manning, WikiLeaks, Dick Cheney, etc. But I do understand how that's confusing for Legion Fag...
 
Yeah, I wasn't talking about Russian collusion, and nothing I say about Douchebag Donald ever has anything to do with the Clintons. I am referring to all of the fawning over Putin and his regime for the past couple of years by Trumptards.

"the fawning over Putin and his regime for the past couple of years by Trumptards"?

This comment makes me really curious 3D.....even the far left propaganda machine we commonly call the media don't pedal this kind of obvious busllshit lie that I've seen....

So....where do you get it ?....Just make up these nutty lies yourself ?....Actually hear someone else say this ?....Just extrapolate the media's far left spin ? Voices in your head ?...Huh?

 
Last edited:
Well, I'm not Julian Assange, Edward Snowden, Bradley Manning, WikiLeaks, Dick Cheney, etc. But I do understand how that's confusing for Legion Fag...
Of course you're not....all those you mention show some intelligence, even some ethics, and some loyalty to their causes....you, on the other hand are just stupid, dishonest and a liar....
 
Well, I'm not Julian Assange, Edward Snowden, Bradley Manning, WikiLeaks, Dick Cheney, etc. But I do understand how that's confusing for Legion Fag...

Your failure in life is not confusing to anyone, poor little history major.

This thread is about what we learned about JFK. None of the others you tried to insinuate have any bearing on the facts.
 
Of course you're not....all those you mention show some intelligence, even some ethics, and some loyalty to their causes....you, on the other hand are just stupid, dishonest and a liar....

He seems awfully anxious to distract us from JFK's nefarious scheme to run a false-flag attack in order to justify a war.
 
He seems awfully anxious to distract us from JFK's nefarious scheme to run a false-flag attack in order to justify a war.

3D's earlier posts were on subject and pretty reasonable, and your #11 post was also spot on........
I just had to call him out on the "
"the fawning over Putin and his regime for the past couple of years by Trumptards" nonsense...
 
3D's earlier posts were on subject and pretty reasonable, and your #11 post was also spot on........
I just had to call him out on the "
"the fawning over Putin and his regime for the past couple of years by Trumptards" nonsense...

The little life loser is in love with JFK, and is a "never-Trumper". He always seems to reveal his underlying ignorance sooner or later.

3D is scum. JFK was scum. His brothers were scum. Their father was scum. DEMOCRAT dynasties are scum.

Running a project to make it look like the other side attacks you so you have an excuse to start a war is evil. JFK was evil.
 
Of course you're not....all those you mention show some intelligence, even some ethics, and some loyalty to their causes....you, on the other hand are just stupid, dishonest and a liar....

Here's an easy Cold War era question for you, Bravo. Which do you love, America or Russia?

Also, I have ethics because I didn't caucus for Douchebag Donald in the GOP primaries. Can you say the same thing?
 
The little life loser is in love with JFK, and is a "never-Trumper". He always seems to reveal his underlying ignorance sooner or later.

3D is scum. JFK was scum. His brothers were scum. Their father was scum. DEMOCRAT dynasties are scum.

Running a project to make it look like the other side attacks you so you have an excuse to start a war is evil. JFK was evil.

Check your script, Legion Fag. You have me confused with some of the latter-day Republicans that grew-up slobbering over JFK and Camelot.
 
Back
Top