JFK Proud In Stance. But Is It Liberal?

[Anti-Party]

“If by a "Liberal" they mean someone who looks ahead and not behind, someone who welcomes new ideas without rigid reactions, someone who cares about the welfare of the people-their health, their housing, their schools, their jobs, their civil rights and their civil liberties-someone who believes we can break through the stalemate and suspicions that grip us in our policies abroad, if that is what they mean by a "Liberal", then I'm proud to say I'm a "Liberal.”

― John F. Kennedy, Profiles in Courage

But the "blame game" keeps us entertained. It's your fault.....

 

[Truth Detector]

“If by a "Liberal" they mean someone who looks ahead and not behind, someone who welcomes new ideas without rigid reactions, someone who cares about the welfare of the people-their health, their housing, their schools, their jobs, their civil rights and their civil liberties-someone who believes we can break through the stalemate and suspicions that grip us in our policies abroad, if that is what they mean by a "Liberal", then I'm proud to say I'm a "Liberal.”

― John F. Kennedy, Profiles in Courage

But the "blame game" keeps us entertained. It's your fault.....

I'm curious by the suggestion that Liberals look ahead. Their tired meme do not resemble forward thinking. Their tired worn out meme is that if only we could throw more money at their failed programs, then they would work.

But the reality and historic failure of their claims suggests a mentally retarded view of the world; a world where they believe that if you keep doing what you have always done, you will get a different result.

The best example of this ideological failure were public housing. This liberal effort where trillions were spent to help eliminate poverty and help the poor turned into rat infested drug dealing pimp dealing cesspools of immorality. This program resulted in tearing down those projects only to re-invent them.

Another great example is our educational system. A centralized authority that has gobbled up trillions with nothing to show for it but that Americans continue to fail miserably in math, economics and grammar.

How about that $850 billion stimulus which did NOTHING to reduce economic malaise and whom leftists like Obama demand another $550 billon claiming that $550 billion can now do what $850 billion simply failed to do.

Theres nothing forward thinking about such stupidity. It's not even backwards thinking; it is retarded.

 

[Airstrip One]

Still no reforming SS, I see...

 

[Anti-Party]

I'm curious by the suggestion that Liberals look ahead. Their tired meme do not resemble forward thinking. Their tired worn out meme is that if only we could throw more money at their failed programs, then they would work.

But the reality and historic failure of their claims suggests a mentally retarded view of the world; a world where they believe that if you keep doing what you have always done, you will get a different result.

The best example of this ideological failure were public housing. This liberal effort where trillions were spent to help eliminate poverty and help the poor turned into rat infested drug dealing pimp dealing cesspools of immorality. This program resulted in tearing down those projects only to re-invent them.

Another great example is our educational system. A centralized authority that has gobbled up trillions with nothing to show for it but that Americans continue to fail miserably in math, economics and grammar.

How about that $850 billion stimulus which did NOTHING to reduce economic malaise and whom leftists like Obama demand another $550 billon claiming that $550 billion can now do what $850 billion simply failed to do.

Theres nothing forward thinking about such stupidity. It's not even backwards thinking; it is retarded.

Im curious to your response because you don't seem to know the difference between a problem solver and a Liberal. Or a problem preventer. Or a problem ignorer.

heh.

 

[Anti-Party]

I'm curious by the suggestion that Liberals look ahead. Their tired meme do not resemble forward thinking. Their tired worn out meme is that if only we could throw more money at their failed programs, then they would work.

But the reality and historic failure of their claims suggests a mentally retarded view of the world; a world where they believe that if you keep doing what you have always done, you will get a different result.

The best example of this ideological failure were public housing. This liberal effort where trillions were spent to help eliminate poverty and help the poor turned into rat infested drug dealing pimp dealing cesspools of immorality. This program resulted in tearing down those projects only to re-invent them.

Another great example is our educational system. A centralized authority that has gobbled up trillions with nothing to show for it but that Americans continue to fail miserably in math, economics and grammar.

How about that $850 billion stimulus which did NOTHING to reduce economic malaise and whom leftists like Obama demand another $550 billon claiming that $550 billion can now do what $850 billion simply failed to do.

Theres nothing forward thinking about such stupidity. It's not even backwards thinking; it is retarded.

I'll make this easy for you kid. Which do you not support for Americans on hard times? I know you think they are all "leeches" but they aren't and you are ignorant for the profiling.

So do you oppose;

Health, housing, education, jobs, civil rights or civil liberties? Easy question.

Of course if I was a profiler I would assume everyone getting welfare was a lazy person like Fox news and the current Right wing is trying to paint to pay for the failed Trickle down deficit...

 

[Anti-Party]

Most Americans are proud and "United we Stand"..........Welcome to America. Yet we born a Christian Country and Sloth isn't "poor". So wake up and learn the difference kid.

 

[Robo]

“If by a "Liberal" they mean someone who looks ahead and not behind, someone who welcomes new ideas without rigid reactions, someone who cares about the welfare of the people-their health, their housing, their schools, their jobs, their civil rights and their civil liberties-someone who believes we can break through the stalemate and suspicions that grip us in our policies abroad, if that is what they mean by a "Liberal", then I'm proud to say I'm a "Liberal.”

― John F. Kennedy, Profiles in Courage

But the "blame game" keeps us entertained. It's your fault.....

A ”TRUE” liberal in any traditional constitutional values sense is simply one who has a very strong connection to the very, ”LI BERAL” Bill Of Rights.

That being truth, logic and total rationality, dictates that ”new ideas” must conform to the principles and mandates of the Constitution and if they do they are the sole authority of the States unless a constitutional amendment authorizes the federal government to institutionalize and conduct it/them.

Caring about the financial welfare of the people-their health, their housing and their schools is also a sole authority of the several individual States in keeping with the 10th amendment of our Constitution and thereby forbidden to be institutionalized and conducted by the federal government.

John Kennedy was no true American “liberal.” Kennedy was simply another BIG government federalist neo-socialist authoritarian.

Our founders had a NEW great idea, a “Constitutional Republic.” They forged together the rules of sanity and limits to good government and gave it to the nation as a guarantee of our “civil rights and civil liberties.” No sooner was the ink dry when they began the process of corrupting and ignoring that great idea. Today that written guarantee is hardly more than toilet paper. What are called “liberals” in government are fucking “leftist.” What are called “conservatives” in government are fucking rightist. A government supposed to be “of the people” is of the duopoly parties and of the bribery, by the bribery and for the bribed.

 

[Anti-Party]

A ”TRUE” liberal in any traditional constitutional values sense is simply one who has a very strong connection to the very, ”LI BERAL” Bill Of Rights.

That being truth, logic and total rationality, dictates that ”new ideas” must conform to the principles and mandates of the Constitution and if they do they are the sole authority of the States unless a constitutional amendment authorizes the federal government to institutionalize and conduct it/them.

Caring about the financial welfare of the people-their health, their housing and their schools is also a sole authority of the several individual States in keeping with the 10th amendment of our Constitution and thereby forbidden to be institutionalized and conducted by the federal government.

John Kennedy was no true American “liberal.” Kennedy was simply another BIG government federalist neo-socialist authoritarian.

Our founders had a NEW great idea, a “Constitutional Republic.” They forged together the rules of sanity and limits to good government and gave it to the nation as a guarantee of our “civil rights and civil liberties.” No sooner was the ink dry when they began the process of corrupting and ignoring that great idea. Today that written guarantee is hardly more than toilet paper. What are called “liberals” in government are fucking “leftist.” What are called “conservatives” in government are fucking rightist. A government supposed to be “of the people” is of the duopoly parties and of the bribery, by the bribery and for the bribed.

You constantly say you are not "far right" when fitting the exact definition, "holding to traditional attitudes and values and cautious about change or innovation, typically in relation to politics or religion." The Constitution was written to change with time to adapt to smarter generations. And yes, younger people are smarter today because we don't rely on grandpa for all our knowledge, we have books and the internet.

A "Republic" is ran by the people....Not by the Governemnt. This is where you fall short. We are not in a Dictator nation. It's YOUR fault that you do not understand the people, their beliefs and reasons.

Kennedy was the first person that wanted to expose Corporations pulling strings in politics. He openly said that he was going to expose it in a speech.

He got shot by a single person from multiple angles some say. The records aren't going to be released for decades, which is what happens in many murder cases *never*.

JFK tried to stop the Corporate control of politicians. Corporate control, controlled it.

 

[Robo]

You constantly say you are not "far right" when fitting the exact definition,

First, I never said I was or wasn’t “far right,” but that label hardly would fit me when I support the notion that every adult has the constitutional right to make an agreeable marriage contract with whoever the hell they want. If I’m far right why do I oppose the Drug War? If I’m far right why do I oppose The Military Industrial Complex and every undeclared, unnecessary unconstitutional war and America’s World Police Force?

"holding to traditional attitudes and values and cautious about change or innovation, typically in relation to politics or religion." The Constitution was written to change with time to adapt to smarter generations.

Actually the Constitution was never supposed to be changed by the Willy-Nilly ideas and notions of politicians or even the majority mob of citizens. If that were the case, it was never meant to have any fucking value at all. The Constitution contains an ”amendment process.”

“…..The Senators and representatives before mentioned and the members of the Several State’s Legislatures, and all executive and judicial officers, both of the United States and the Several States, shall be bound by oath or Affirmation to support this Constitution but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.”(Article 6, United States Constitution)

“The Congress whenever two thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose Amendments to this Constitution, or, the Applications of the Legislatures of two thirds of the Several States shall call a Convention for the purpose of proposing Amendments which in either case shall be valid for all intents and purposes…..” (Article 5, United States Constitution)

A "Republic" is ran by the people....Not by the Governemnt.

“A government of the people, by the people and for the people. (Abraham Lincoln)

This is where you fall short. We are not in a Dictator nation. It's YOUR fault that you do not understand the people, their beliefs and reasons.

“…..This Constitution and the laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made under the authority of the United States shall be the Supreme Law Of The Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby…..”(Article 6, United States Constitution)

Kennedy was the first person that wanted to expose Corporations pulling strings in politics. He openly said that he was going to expose it in a speech.

Kennedy was a typical progressive, leftist, socialist BIG fucking government Dork, just like all you bastard leftist Democrats.