Jesse Jackson lauds Trump speech

I think we will have to see by his actions -which is the same thing J.Jackson was saying. I believe he wants MAGA all the way around but we'll have to see

Definitely on the wait and see.

But I'm looking for reasons to doubt Trump's sincerity and I can't come up with much. Of course, trying and achieving are two different things.

But do the democrats get out of his way if he tries? Would they risk opposing him?

I'm convinced many of them don't know what they could be in for.
 
Years ago, Jesse asked the super liberal progressive music industry to put a voluntary ban on the N-word.

Of course, the greedy liberal socialist, class clown, pigs only cared about the money. and refused.
 
Definitely on the wait and see.

But I'm looking for reasons to doubt Trump's sincerity and I can't come up with much. Of course, trying and achieving are two different things.

But do the democrats get out of his way if he tries? Would they risk opposing him?

I'm convinced many of them don't know what they could be in for.
I'm convinced many Dems haven't thought anything out except obstructionism and #notmypresident. sad!
 
you posted that all blacks are criminal and in gangs, own it stupid.

It's exactly what you racist think.

I'm no coward like you....I say what I mean.

When you can learn to do the same maybe we can have a discussion.

Until then STFU!
 
Well, he does have a pretty long history as a racial instigator. Sharpton is definitely worse though.

But that's what makes his statement so remarkable.
Sharpton is junk noise.. He can't wait to descend on any community and stir up racial animosity for his own benefit.
It's how he makes his living .and then there was Tawana Brawley (sp)..

Jackson set a higher ideal here then rank partisanship that grips the ( many) Dem's minds they don't even want Trumps emphasis on helping stressed cities.It's illogical bleating by many (not all)
 
I have not heard any yet that are saying they will work with Trump and actually move ahead. You have a valid point here.

But Trump can put them in a position to where they either need to help him help the poorer urban precincts, or obstruct in order to keep the Trump=Hitler narrative going.

What are they going to do? Which is more important to them?

Maybe I'm over thinking it and/or giving Trump too much credit, but if he is scheming to undermine the democrats in the Hyper Blue urban precincts he's a pretty slick operator for a non-politician.

Or maybe he doesn't give a crap about the political power play and just wants to help the poor urban people.

I admit I don't know which.
 
I have not heard any yet that are saying they will work with Trump and actually move ahead. You have a valid point here.

How many republicans did you hear say they were going to work with Obama?

In 8 years, very few did, and obstructing Obama became a republican mantra. They even brag about it.

Mitch McConnell Brags About Obstructing Obama At Trump’s Republican Convention
http://www.politicususa.com/2016/07...a-supreme-court-nominee-trump-convention.html

Why do you think democrats should treat Trump any differently than republicans treated Obama?
 
Back
Top