Jeffrey Epstein is alive

Tough beans, unhingedfascist, but you tried for once.

The short answer is yes — the blood from the sofa where Hitler shot himself was used to identify him, and yes, it was still testable eight decades later. The search results you triggered give us unusually solid confirmation.

🟥 Was the blood used to identify Hitler?​

Absolutely. The forensic teams working with the Gettysburg Museum of History conducted multiple rounds of DNA sequencing on the bloodstain taken from the bunker sofa.

Key points from the sources:

  • The stain was authenticated as human blood from a gunshot wound.
  • Researchers performed eight years of forensic testing and DNA sequencing.
  • The resulting DNA was compared with Y‑chromosome samples from verified living relatives of Hitler, obtained by journalist Jean‑Paul Mulders.
  • The match confirmed the blood belonged to the Hitler paternal line, ruling out escape theories and confirming his death in the bunker.
This is the same methodology used to identify Richard III’s remains — and the same geneticist, Dr. Turi King, led the interpretation.

🟥 Was the DNA still viable after 80 years?​

Yes — and the search results explain why.

  • The blood was taken from a piece of material removed from the sofa in 1945, immediately after the fall of Berlin.
  • The sample was preserved by U.S. Army Colonel Roswell Rosengren and remained protected from heat, moisture, and UV light — the main causes of DNA decay.
  • Modern sequencing techniques can recover usable DNA even from highly degraded, fragmented samples, which is exactly what the researchers did.
The South China Morning Post confirms that the DNA testing was made possible by blood from the sofa on which Hitler shot himself.

🟥 Bottom line​

  • Yes, the blood from the suicide sofa was used to identify Hitler.
  • Yes
 
Jake Starkey said:
Actual scientific proof is not an appeal to authority, which you do all the time. An appeal to authority is a fallacious reliance on someone’s status rather than on evidence. You cannot defeat

Appeal to evidence
Appeal to reason/logical argument
Empirical justification
Independent verification

What U wrote is true because evidence and reasoning support it.

Unhinged2008 has lost again.
Click to expand...
he's fucking dumb.
 
Monad Portal said:
get your lips off Zionist cock.

it makes you look weak.
Click to expand...

Nothing looks as weak and pathetic as a Nazi wannabe.

iu
 
Jake Starkey said:
Immaterial. Ask a responsible question.
Click to expand...
It's part of the cover up with all the same players. Witnesses who saw Barr visit Epstein suddenly went silent after being threatened to shut up or else. You have to listen to what is being said before the narrative is forced on gullible Americans who believe whatever state-owned media tells them to believe.

The controversy over suicide or murder is all part of the script. Anyone saying Epstein is alive is instantly rejected by groupthink. The internet and independent journalism makes it easy to expose government lies.
 
Yes, Goat, I know you believe in this conspiracy. But you have no evidence that had anything to do with murder. It is merely your and friends' surmises.
 
Jake Starkey said:
Yes, Goat, I know you believe in this conspiracy. But you have no evidence that had anything to do with murder. It is merely your and friends' surmises.
Click to expand...
Was it suicide or murder? Government intentionally started this controversy to keep us squabbling instead of asking what happened to the witnesses at MCC.

Those pushing the narrative are always the same people called in for misdirection because Americans are familiar with them and trust them. That's why Colin Powell was called in to sell the world on WMDs, and Obama was selected to continue the disaster of GWB.

You idiots sucked in hook line and sinker. Forensics are my ace in the hole but again, you idiots would rather fight over suicide or murder.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top