Japan and USA must respect China

They entered our territorial waters, destroyed our property (the fishing boat), and seized our citizens.

What the Japanese seized was not Zhan Qixiong, the trawler's captain, but the dignity of the Chinese nation.

China will take strong counter measures if the Japanese side continues to act willfully and double its mistakes. Japan shall suffer all the consequences.

The Diaoyu Islands have been part of Chinese territory since the early years of the Ming Dynasty (1368-1644).
 
The book "Shun Feng Xiang Song" published during the reign of Yongle (1403-1424) contained records about the islands. The book was published more than 400 years before the Japanese discovery of the Diaoyu Islands by the Ryukyuan Koga Tatsushiro in 1884, on which Japan stakes its claim.

Since the book, many Chinese historical documents mentioned the islands.

The maps printed in Japan in 1783 and 1785 that marked out the boundary of the Ryukyu Kingdom show that the Diaoyu Islands belonged to China.

In 1879, Japan annexed the Ryukyu Islands, and in the same year, the Chinese and Japanese governments negotiated ownership of the islands. Representatives from both sides held that the Ryukyu Islands comprised of 36 islands, of which the Diaoyu Islands were not a part.

Before the outbreak of the Sino-Japanese War of 1894-1895, launched by Japan to annex Korea and invade China, Japan had not raised any objections to Chinese sovereignty over the Diaoyu Islands.

In April 1895, the government of the Qing Dynasty of China (1644-1911), vanquished in the war, was forced to sign the humiliating Treaty of Shimonoseki, by which the Qing government ceded to Japan the entire island of Taiwan, its surrounding islands and the Penghu Islands. Since then, Japan has referred to the Diaoyu Islands as the Senkaku Islands. But prior to the war, Japanese maps had all called the islands by their Chinese name.

In 1945, Japan was defeated, and all international documents clearly stated that Taiwan and its surrounding islands were a part of Chinese territory.

Japanese authorities detained the Chinese captain with the application of domestic Japanese law, which is an attempt to demonstrate Japan's administration of the Diaoyu Islands. But that cannot prove the islands are not a part of Chinese territory.

Both the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation reaffirmed Chinese sovereignty over Taiwan and its surrounding islands, including the Diaoyu Islands.
 
Behind the groundless suspicion over China's status as a developing country are the so-called allegations of greater "China responsibility" and developed countries' intentions to shun their own international responsibility.

The Newsweek website last month quoted Bernard Baumohl, executive director of the Economic Outlook Group, a Wall Street advisory firm, as saying that "China can no longer be called an emerging economy" and must "come to terms with a greater international responsibility."

The allegation deserves more careful reading. As Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao said Thursday at the UN, "China is still in the primary stage of socialism and remains a developing country," with the per capita GDP hovering low, nationwide development being at an imbalanced level, and a big population still living under the poverty line.

It is impossible, by drawing China away from the world of developing countries, to change China's current development situation and bring Chinese people a high-level standard of living like that of developed countries.

So what is the real intention of all the skepticism?

Western countries often connect their arguments with such terms as "responsibility" and "duty." Baumohl's statement is just an example. In fact, some developed countries intend to impose more undue duties on China, shift the attention of the international community from themselves and shirk their own responsibility.

Most developed countries have not fulfilled their commitments to developing countries regarding the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs).

Take the official development assistance (ODA), a key anti-poverty effort, for example. Developed countries promised 30 years ago to devote 0.7 percent of the GDP to help poor countries, but up to date only Denmark, Luxemburg, Holland, Norway and Sweden have achieved the normal standard set by the UN.

In a recently released report titled The Global Partnership for Development at a Critical Juncture, the UN pointed out that among the most urgent areas identified in the report, there is a current shortfall of about 20 billion U.S. dollars in the annual level of aid as agreed five years ago by the Group of Eight (G8).

At their Gleneagles meeting, G8 members pledged that by 2010, they would increase ODA by 50 billion dollars and double aid to Africa. However, the current funding gap on commitments to Africa alone is over 16 billion dollars.

There also has been no significant reduction in the tariffs imposed by developed countries. Only 81 percent of the least developed countries' exports, excluding armaments and oil, have acquired duty-free status in industrialized countries' markets. This falls short of the 2005 commitment made by WTO members in Hong Kong, which allows 97 percent of exports from the poorest countries to enter rich-country markets without duties or quotas.

"It's more helpful to give a loaf of bread than a rubber cheque," Premier Wen said in his speech at one of UN meetings last week.

Actually, most developing countries have called on developed countries to fulfill their promises and implement their major responsibilities in assisting developing countries.

However, some developed countries, which failed to honor their pledged commitments, have asked China to take the responsibility that they themselves should have assumed. It's all the more obvious that similar incidents have happened on issues like climate change and trade balance.

On the issue of carbon emission reduction, some developed countries deliberately ignored the fact that China has a low per capita figure of energy consumption, and hyped the alleged news that China has become the world's largest energy consumer, in a bid to force China to take inappropriate responsibility.

A look at developed countries themselves would find that major emission countries, including the United States, Japan and some European countries, tried their best to evade the emission-reduction responsibility.

The developing world should not be deceived by the intentions of some Western countries.

As a Chinese saying goes: responsibility is weightier than Mount Tai (a well-known high mountain in China). During past years, China has made big efforts in assisting other developing countries and has always stood by them, taking moral responsibility to help its developing brothers.

Moreover, the "spillover effect" of China's economic development has benefited many developing countries.

Any attempt to draw China away from the developing world will undoubtedly harm the overall interests of the developing countries.
 
Japan's so-called evidence-taking activities are illegal, invalid and conducted in vain.

China demands Japan stop activities.

I am told that, following the 'hand back' of territories to Japan by our dear friends USA, after the war a mistake was made and the Dai Yue islands were included. In this case there must be documented evidence either in Tokyo or Washington to support this.
Deng Xiao Ping said 'Put the matter in the freezer' (Put it on ice) for fifty years' certainly one of his least wise statements since he was quite aware that his statement that it is good to be rich would signal the start of the most successful growth economy ever known.
Your article is useful but it doesnt answer the question of where the modern documentary evidence now is. Is Tokyo hiding it? Is it buried somewhere in Washington?
Well maybe it does, I'll re-read it.
 
Coolface_troll_seal.png
 
Back
Top