January 6 was a violent insurrection attempt.
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
Every time the Trump party gets a hold of those videos they claim they will release them, then backtrack.
How comes Trumpers are not saying city streets are "the peoples' streets"?
ThatOwlWoman
Not Nice
ThatOwlWoman
Not Nice
Of course. This is the culmination of a Republican plan to ensure that no one from the other party can get elected, giving the MAGATs a veto-proof majority so that they can enact their freedom-destroying agenda. We saw it go down in real time in Missouri, where the veto-proof (R) super majority shot down several citizen initiatives. One regulated puppy mills, a widespread, horrible thing in the state. Another vacated St. Louis and Kansas City's minimum wage increases, also approved by voters.
It is clear that they want an authoritarian fascist state where they know what's best for the citizens.
Yakuda
Verified User
So then everyone at the capitol on J6 was a violent insurrectionist. Why weren't more violent insurrectionists killed that day? Or was there only one violent insurrectionist, an unarmed woman, who apparently was going to kill the vp. How exactly was she going to do that? The only reason you didn't want the vp killed the as because he was going to verify the election otherwise he'd have been fair game right?
Dear JAR-HEAD,
January 6th was not a an insurrection as you have defined the term; namely, as: "a violent uprising against an authority or government", in this case the recently elected Biden administration. The problem you have is that the November 8th ,2020 election result was illegitimate. Everyone with an IQ of over 80 knows that the Democrat Party used COVID-19 as an excuse for the public to have expanded access to mail-in ballots when voting in the nov 8th, 2020 Presidential election. Mail-in ballots are well known for being HIGHLY vulnerable to tampering, and, of course, this is the main method the Democrats used to defrauded the vote in the 2020 Presidential electiion and have Joe Biden wrongfully declared the winner of the race.
no reasonable American citizen denies that the 2020 election was crooked. People like you, insist that Biden won fairly, but you - young, brainwashed lefties - are not 'reasonable' members of the American electorate; just tragic victims of mind-control techniques that were beyond their comprehension.
So, if the demonstration that took place at the Capitol building on the 6th January was not against a LEGITIMATE authority, in the form of a LEGITIMATE American Presidential election process and a LEGITIMATE election result (which it was not) then it can not be described as an insurrection.
Also, an insurrection is defined as a "violent uprising. From what the recently - released security video tapes show, there was precious little serious violence used by the so-called insurrectionists, who were "rising up" to stop a crooked electoral process. All I saw ,at worse, (on the part of the anti-Biden protestors) was a bit of angry "argy-bargy" - that is, a bit a "push and shove" that flared up now and then OUTSIDE the Capitol building, but not when the "Jan 6th Insurrectionists" were INSIDE of it. In fact the only real violence I saw inside the Capitol building on Jan 6th was a Black cop executing a young woman with a pistol shot through the neck. If those Americans who were (in many cases) POLITELY LET IN TO THE CAPITOL BUILDING BY POLICE, had been real insurrectionaries, they : (1) would have been heavily armed, and (2) would have been a lot of dead bodies lying in the chamber where the vote-tallying was taking place that day in the Capitol building.
What was much, (much) more like a REAL insurrection is the Democrat - encouraged, BLM riots in the US that erupted during the summer months of 2020. In this disgusting episode, Black mobs were permitted to run violently amok across America. By the time the rioting stopped, the BLM mobs had been responsible for the deaths of 35 persons and for seriously injuring 1000s of police offices, along with causing $2 billion worth of damage/destruction to private and state property. And all the while senior Democrat politicians like that piece of shit, Nancy Pelosi, and your current (animated dildo) Vice President, Kamala Harris, were CHEERING THE BLM THUGS ON.
In conclusion, if you honestly believe that Joe Biden won the Nov 2020 Presidential election "fair and square" and is a legitimate President of the United States, then in terms of intellectual capacity, you must have about as much brain-power as a garden frog.
Likewise, if you insist on referring to the protests that took place against the OBVIOUSLY fraudulent Nov 8th, 2020, Presidential elections on January 6th, 2021, you are speaking through your ass-hole and making a fool of yourself. If there actually had been a real insurrection on the 6th of Jan, then there would also have been quite a few dead Congressional Democrats, lying on the floor of the Chamber by the end of that day, And on the 7th of January, Trump would effectively have become POTUS. But that didn't happen did it? No, that's right, it didn't. This is because what took place on the 6 Jan was not even REMOTELY like a genuine insurrection. The Democrats have used the term "insurrection" as media propaganda to frighten the American public into thinking that Trump is some kind of modern-day, political incarnation of Robbespierre. And anyone (like YOU) who swallows this line of ridiculous bullshit is truly a MAJOR DIP-STICK !.
Dachshund - the WONDER HOUND
DLM....Dachshund Lives Matter !!
.
Last edited:
Callinectes
Proud MAGA Semi-Facist
Yakuda
Verified User
The only weapon discharged that day was by a capitol "cop" to kill an unarmed woman.
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
Mike Johnson promised the video but is censoring it to prevent the guilty from being charged with crimes like sedition, insurrection, violence or treason.
https://www.msnbc.com/opinion/msnbc...nuary-six-footage-rcna128141?ref=upstract.com
What Mike Johnson is really hiding by blurring Jan. 6 footage
There's nothing new that MAGA truthers could learn from the tapes — but plenty for the amateur sedition hunters who scour video from the attack.
Last month, Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., announced that the House would release more than 40,000 hours of internal security video taken during the Jan 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol. But during a news conference on Tuesday, Johnson clarified that those tapes won’t be entirely unedited. “We have to blur some of the faces of persons who participated in the events of that day because we don’t want them to be retaliated against and to be charged by the DOJ,” Johnson said.
As my colleague Steve Benen quickly pointed out, Johnson’s statement positions him as defending the people in the security camera video from potential arrest for any crimes they committed that day. It’s worth taking a step back, though, to look at how Johnson’s two choices — to release the tapes and to blur the faces of participants — were fueled by two distinct desires. In making the tapes public, he was acting to protect himself from the fury of the far right. But in blurring their faces, Johnson is in essence protecting these rioters from themselves.
At the most obvious level, Johnson’s statement alone speaks volumes about his absurd claim that the Republican Party “stands for the rule of law.”
Phyllis Diller
Was it me?
what's the magat freedom destroying agenda?
border enforcement and no child genital mutilation?
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
The police were wimps. The Marines should have been there to shoot down hundreds of the treasonous insurrectionists.
As it it, they will be hunted down and brought to justice, one way or another.
The good news is that I know you and your MAGAt, anti-Constitutionalist, treason-supporting friends won't be at any of these violent protests, Yak, so you're safe.
Phyllis Diller
Was it me?
The police were wimps. The Marines should have been there to shoot down hundreds of the treasonous insurrectionists.
As it it, they will be hunted down and brought to justice, one way or another.
The good news is that I know you and your MAGAt, anti-Constitutionalist, treason-supporting friends won't be at any of these violent protests, Yak, so you're safe.
that's great thinking there.
i encourage you to counsel your preferred candidate to take a harsher stance on jan 6 tourism grannies.
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
Thanks. I know you're safe too since you'd never risk your skin in a violent act, Freda.
Phyllis Diller
Was it me?
Thanks. I know you're safe too since you'd never risk your skin in a violent act, Freda.
you're just an half-evolved violent idiot.
because at present, under the Biden junta, the major federal agencies like the FBI, the DOJ, the IRS, etc; have been politically weaponised and used to attack 'the people'
In any case, are you seriously denying that Donald Trump was/is a POPULIST politician? If you are, you have got "S**T for brains", and should quit posting your garbage on political forums like this.
Dachshund - the WONDER HOUND
DLM....Dachshund Lives Matter !!
That makes no sense. People who broke into the capitol, trashed the building and attacked the capital police were committing crimes. There were various degrees of crimes and the people charged had their day in court. Over 140 police were injured by the insurrectionists.
You mean the guy who lost the popular vote to Hillary Clinton?
But, yes, with nincompoops he was and is extremely popular. Happily there weren't enough of them again after experiencing one term of him in office.
p.s. That know nothings ought not to post here I've suggested myself once or twice. Think about it.
Last edited:
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
There's no need to fear me, Freda, or US law enforcement....unless I'm correct that you are being groomed as a patsy for a militia terrorist group, then, yes, you should fear being arrested or shot trying to escape.
