January 6 was a violent insurrection attempt.

The election was stolen because Rama-lama-ding-dong said so? That's your proof?
BWAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
You say so many ignorant things. The forum is laughing at you. And we're not the only ones.

You don't get to speak for the entire forum. Omniscience fallacy .
You can't make the evidence of election fraud by Democrats just disappear, Sock. You can't make people's judgement of that evidence just disappear either.

You cannot escape your fate.
 
ColdJunk thinks the election was stolen because Rama-lama-ding-dong said so.
That's his proof. Isn't that hilarious?
ColdJunk is more proof that MAGA morons just aren't very smart. No wonder Trump loves the poorly-educated.

Argument of the Stone fallacy. You can't make the evidence of election fraud by Democrats just disappear.
 
Then why aren't you showing us all this proof. Come on, ColdJunk. Let's see your proof right now. Post it here in your next post.
We know you won't because you can't because it only exists in your delusional mind. That's why everyone is laughing at you, ColdJunk.

RQAA. I've already shown it to you. Argument of the Stone fallacy.
 
You use 'Just the News' as your source? Are you fucking crazy? You must really like being laughed at.
Posting this news source really makes you look ridiculous.
The fact that you swallow this bullshit so easily speaks volumes about your naivety and gullibility. You're just not smart enough to differentiate the truth from utter bullshit. This is why people laugh at you, ColdJunk.

Overall, we rate Just the News Questionable and Right Biased based on story selection that mostly favors a conservative perspective. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to numerous failed fact checks and the promotion of conspiracy theories and right-wing propaganda.
Detailed Report

Questionable Reasoning: Conspiracy Theories, Propaganda, Numerous Failed Fact Checks
Bias Rating: FAR RIGHT
Factual Reporting: MIXED
Media Type: Website
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

Argument of the Stone fallacy. Genetic fallacy. You don't get to dictate 'credibility'. Omniscience fallacy.
 
Trump lost the 2020 election.
There was no 2020 election. You cannot lose what never took place.
He even admitted such to his staff.
You don't get to speak for Trump. You only get to speak for you. Omniscience fallacy. Wordstuffing.
All 50 states certified their votes.
Blatant lie. Seven States never chose their electors.
You just can't handle losing so you'd rather believe bullshit conspiracy theories so your feelings don't get hurt.
You are describing yourself again.
You've really made yourself look silly in this thread.
You are describing yourself again.
Why don't you stop while you're behind because you're really looking foolish.
Assumption of victory fallacy.
 
Apparently, you don't mind looking like a fucking fool.
You are describing yourself again.
Everything you've mentioned above has been disproven.
Attempted proof by circular. Circular argument fallacy (fundamentalism).
You're such a pussy. You can't handle losing so you latch on to these silly conspiracy theories on these far right media sources that have zero credibility because they make you feel all warm and fuzzy.
You don't get to declare 'credibility' for anyone. Omniscience fallacy.
Nobody believes the election was stolen anymore.
You don't get to speak for everyone. Omniscience fallacy.
Even FoxNews admitted it.
Fox is owned and operated by DEMOCRATS, Sock.
Trump admitted it to his staff.
Wordstuffing. Lie.
And yet you still swallow the bullshit. You're like the Flat-Earthers.
Straw man fallacy. Assumption of victory fallacy. Argument of the Stone fallacy.
Do you tell your friends and co-workers you think the election was stolen? Do they laugh in your face?
There was no election in 2020.
 
WLT Report? [/COLOR]My God, you continue to prove to us how gullible and naive you are. You just believe what makes you feel good.
Genetic fallacy.
And any fact you read that hurts your feelings, you call Fake News.
You are describing yourself again, Sock.
The only reason these far right media sources exist
What 'far right media source'?
is because there are just enough stupid, gullible morons like you who are naive enough to swallow their bullshit.
Argument of the Stone fallacy. Genetic fallacy.
You know why the mainstream media doesn't report these bullshit stories? Because they're bullshit. They would lose all credibility.
You don't get to declare 'credibility' for anyone. Omniscience fallacy. The so-called 'mainstream media' is owned and operated by Democrats.
Like I said before, it's unfortunate that you just don't have the cognitive ability to discern what's true and what's not.
You are describing yourself again.
Unfortunate for you. This is why your friends and neighbors laugh at you behind your back.
You don't get to speak for everyone. Omniscience fallacy.
Overall, we rate WLT Report as far-right biased and questionable based on the promotion of propaganda, conspiracies, pseudoscience, the use of poor sources, a lack of transparency, and demonstratable false claims.
Questionable Reasoning: Propaganda, Conspiracy, Pseudoscience, Poor Sourcing, False Claims, Lack of Transparency
Bias Rating: EXTREME RIGHT
Factual Reporting: LOW
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

Omniscience fallacy. Genetic fallacy. Argument of the Stone fallacy.
No argument presented.
 
Oh Christ. Are you gonna claim The Deep State? George Soros? Hugo Chavez? You're a fucking loon not worthy of my time.
Trying to converse with you is like conversing with a child. On to my IGNORE list you go.

Meh. Argument of the Stick fallacy. Denial of history. Strawman fallacies.
:hearnoevil::seenoevil::bdh: Censorship doesn't work.
 
Back
Top