January 6 Committee REFUSES to Hear Secret Service Testimony

volsrock

Verified User
On June 30, Liz Cheney ASSURED Jonathan Karl on GMA that it would be important for the January 6 Committee to hear testimony under oath from the Secret Service agents who have contradicted the second hand hearsay of Cassidy Hutchinson. As you can see in this video, that assurance by Cheney just went up in smoke.



They dont give a fuck about the truth
 
Last edited:
How odd, the committee err witchhunt would have a great opportunity to clear the name of Blassy Ford, I mean Smollett, err I mean Hutchenson instead of having them continue to remain a conservative meme for the next century. err I mean the next seven years until Alenanderia Occasional Cortes tells us the world will end.
I wonder if a half dozen Hutchenson supporters here will dig up my prediction that the committee? will never have her hearsay testimony refuted by people that were actually there.
 
testimony from Hutchinson was hear say and 2nd hand at that


testimony from the agents is not hear say..that's why they don't want them to testify
 
Bullshit, Cheney said it right in the video that they would welcome any evidence they could offer and are willing to hear from them

The guy who supposedly wants to testify, and who hasn’t said anything since saying such, is Trump’s hand pick guy, even had him serving in the Cabinet for awhile, and as we all know from seeing Jordan and Meadows, saying you will testify means nothing

And please, spare us the bloviating from obscure podcasters who have to use a clipboard to say what they want
 
On June 30, Liz Cheney ASSURED Jonathan Karl on GMA that it would be important for the January 6 Committee to hear testimony under oath from the Secret Service agents who have contradicted the second hand hearsay of Cassidy Hutchinson. As you can see in this video, that assurance by Cheney just went up in smoke.



They dont give a fuck about the truth

You could not possibly be any fucking dumber. Cheney literally said they've already spoken to the Secret Service and that the committee welcomes the Secret Service to testify again.
 
testimony from Hutchinson was hear say and 2nd hand at that


testimony from the agents is not hear say..that's why they don't want them to testify

She was in the car, you raging fucking idiot. And as I said in my last post, the Secret Service has talked to the committee and they are welcome to talk to the committee again. You're such a pile of dog shit.
 
On June 30, Liz Cheney ASSURED Jonathan Karl on GMA that it would be important for the January 6 Committee to hear testimony under oath from the Secret Service agents who have contradicted the second hand hearsay of Cassidy Hutchinson. As you can see in this video, that assurance by Cheney just went up in smoke.



They dont give a fuck about the truth

of course.


this dem farce is a tv show filled with lies only, having no correspondence to real-world truth.
 
of course.


this dem farce is a tv show filled with lies only, having no correspondence to real-world truth.

Amazing, even when presented with real word facts, even those spoken clearly by Cheney in the video offered, the MAGA militia still clings to what they want to believe
 
On June 30, Liz Cheney ASSURED Jonathan Karl on GMA that it would be important for the January 6 Committee to hear testimony under oath from the Secret Service agents who have contradicted the second hand hearsay of Cassidy Hutchinson. As you can see in this video, that assurance by Cheney just went up in smoke.



They dont give a fuck about the truth

real source please
 
On June 30, Liz Cheney ASSURED Jonathan Karl on GMA that it would be important for the January 6 Committee to hear testimony under oath from the Secret Service agents who have contradicted the second hand hearsay of Cassidy Hutchinson. As you can see in this video, that assurance by Cheney just went up in smoke.



They dont give a fuck about the truth

So, if I am following this stupid logic, because the next hearing does not have those guys testifying under oath, it means they wont or haven't had them testify under oath?
 
Back
Top