Do you have a specific example?For example, people who attribute an emotion that isn't in play in order to summarily reject it are not having a good faith discussion.
Do you have a specific example?For example, people who attribute an emotion that isn't in play in order to summarily reject it are not having a good faith discussion.
Good.
Sorry, I do apologize for not keeping up with this year's pronouns. However, "us" and "we" are collective as opposed to personal like "you" or "I". Are you saying pronouns have changed their meaning?
What you consider "talking down" is you responding as a "Child" to a perceived "Parent" in the Transactional Analysis model of people and relationships. I'm talking as an "Adult" and expect others to respond in kind...unless they have "issues", then it becomes a matter of both miscommunication (~90% of all human conflict) and curiosity.
http://changingminds.org/explanations/behaviors/ta.htm
Do you have a specific example?
I know what "us" and "we" mean. I used them intentionally.
You repeatedly calling me "angry" when anger is no factor in our conversation.
You are constantly on the attack against anyone disagreeing with you. Most just leave. I'm guessing that gives you the false impression of winning something.
Disagreed on your reasonableness to me and anyone else who disagrees with you. Saying reasonable conversation with me is "literally impossible" is the type of hyperbole an effeminate personality would use. It's obviously both illogical and a lie.
Exactly my point. You presume to speak for others and/or puff up your reply with the strength of others to avoid standing on your own.
You missed the posts since it's not just "our" conversation. Do you really want me to go back and repost some of your juicier replies to someone disagreeing with you?
Again, exactly my point: You are presuming to speak for millions of people. That takes a rather large ego. LOLAbsolute horse shit. I am part of the LGBTQ community. "We" are "us" and "you" are "them".
I use those exclusionary pronouns to emphasize that you are not an ally and that many in the community are united.
Again, exactly my point: You are presuming to speak for millions of people. That takes a rather large ego. LOL
You use the those exclusionary pronouns for two reasons: To direct hate at me for being born male, straight and white and to puff up your own importance.
Put Trump in Guantanamo! Good idea
...and you believe I'm truly the arrogant asshole in this conversation. LOLI do speak for millions of people. It's part of being a minority.
I already told you exactly why I use those pronouns. You responded, as you always do, by telling me that I don't know what I think but you do. Imagine the oversized, foul ego (yes, it is straight, white male syndrome to the textbook definition) required to tell a stranger on the internet that you know better than I do what I mean. That mansplaining is a worn out, dying tactic.
...and you believe I'm truly the arrogant asshole in this conversation. LOL
Yes, and I both acknowledged my understanding of why you did so and posted why I think that's wrong to do. Your bigotry matches the hatefulness of the RWNJs against Jews and African-Americans. You're smarter than most of them. Are you seriously denying you can't see you're just as malicious as they are?
They'll probably give him a job interrogating prisoners. Just have him replay his last presidential announcement! I know that sounds more cruel that water-boarding, but think of all the information we'll get from the other terrorists!