T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
Pointing out where she's doing a similar fail. Dodging every question with weasel words and equivocation isn't building confidence, or it shouldn't.
Jackson, Biden's Supreme Court pick, refuses to define the word 'woman'
- Thread starter dukkha
- Start date
Pointing out where she's doing a similar fail. Dodging every question with weasel words and equivocation isn't building confidence, or it shouldn't.
and she failed miserably
Grown men shouldn't need to be told what women are. Other than you Incels, the rest of us agree on that, including the candidate. lol
I have already told you that at least one question was a complex question fallacy and I have explained it to you. Then you went off tangent talking about Clinton.
This thread, and the question itself, is absurd, all theater for Fox and the rest of the right wing media, doing their best to get those suppose cultural issues out there, they don't give a rat's ass what the lady thinks about anything
And playing the game, which she brilliantly avoided, how does one define "women?" Out of context, any definition offered can be dissected, deflected, and attacked from any direction, as I said, it is all theatrics
And playing the game, which she brilliantly avoided, how does one define "women?" Out of context, any definition offered can be dissected, deflected, and attacked from any direction, as I said, it is all theatrics
They are afraid of powerful pussies, especially the hot and baked pussies. Bonus is when they're brown.
Oven preheated and ready.
They are afraid of losing the midterms I suspect.
Hoosier Daddy
Verified User
what they said about Bork and Thomas and Beer Boy were backed up by witnesses and other testimony, fool. if they have a witness that accuses her of being sexually aggressive at work or at a party, bring them on. or with Bork, agreeing to fire a special prosecutor because others had resigned above him in the legal chain because Nixon said so. what a dumbass you are.
Hoosier Daddy
Verified User
will you do so like a trained parrot just because some clown wants you to, when it is irrelevant to her nomination?
Hoosier Daddy
Verified User
you can't even write a complete sentence, you stupid pig. fuck you. they bitch could not? what a stupid drunk hillbilly you must be who hates women and turns to blowing goats instead.
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
It isn't a complex question fallacy. A complex question fallacy gives you no choice other than a bad choice. Or, are you saying that CRT in and of itself is a bad choice and that is how the question I used is a complex question fallacy?
One more time, the question presupposes that CRT is being taught in public schools.
Hoosier Daddy
Verified User
why are you so afraid of simple facts? there is no doubt slavery and then jim crow laws that existed in this country for hundreds of years is a major reason why black people are still behind in earnings, get tougher sentences for the same crimes as whites with similar backgrounds, and all the rest. the same reason so few women are the heads of fortune 500 companies even today, and almost none 20 years ago. being held down and suppressed has consequences that takes time to heal.
Hoosier Daddy
Verified User
she has her record to look at. how she has judged cases at the federal level, as an appeals court. isn't that a better way to judge her ability to judge than defining words, you goofy right wing clowns?
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
With Barrett, the Democrats zeroed in on her religion like the goofy Left-wing clowns they are...
Thank you for admitting that those Republicans were being childish.
Ridiculous," media personality Piers Morgan tweeted. "I’m not a brain surgeon but I know what a brain is. This is where ‘progressive’ thinking leads - to a terror of stating basic unarguable facts lest it offend the woke brigade."
"The Party of Science," proclaimed RealClearInvestigations deputy editor Benjamin Weingarten. "Thing is, this is a perfect illustration of where progressive ideology leads us: To a position in which a Supreme Court nominee won’t admit the most basic of truths."
"Wow, our WOKE world has come to this that an educated woman can't even define herself...
some called it out as a form of virtue signaling, with conservative LGBTQ author Chad Felix Greene writing, "This has become the new way progressives express their moral superiority without revealing their intellectual weakness."
Editor-in-chief of The Federalist Mollie Hemingway added, "The new leftist orthodoxy is that ‘woman’ can’t be defined scientifically or logically and that if you do so define it, you must be canceled and destroyed. Healthy."
https://www.foxnews.com/media/outrage-ketanji-brown-jackson-tells-senators-woman-bizarre
"The Party of Science," proclaimed RealClearInvestigations deputy editor Benjamin Weingarten. "Thing is, this is a perfect illustration of where progressive ideology leads us: To a position in which a Supreme Court nominee won’t admit the most basic of truths."
"Wow, our WOKE world has come to this that an educated woman can't even define herself...
some called it out as a form of virtue signaling, with conservative LGBTQ author Chad Felix Greene writing, "This has become the new way progressives express their moral superiority without revealing their intellectual weakness."
Editor-in-chief of The Federalist Mollie Hemingway added, "The new leftist orthodoxy is that ‘woman’ can’t be defined scientifically or logically and that if you do so define it, you must be canceled and destroyed. Healthy."
https://www.foxnews.com/media/outrage-ketanji-brown-jackson-tells-senators-woman-bizarre
And Lindsey didn't when he asked her directly what religion she practiced? That's a first
Other Twitter critics pounced on Jackson invoking biology in her response. Informed Dissent podcaster Leonydus Johnson pointed out, "In her asinine deflection, she accidentally acknowledged that being a woman is defined by biology."
Babylon Bee CEO Seth Dillon noted that "to say biologists must answer this question is to suggest that womanhood is tied to biology (which is what conservatives argue)."
"If she knows it's a biological question then she knows the answer," American Commitment President Phil Kerpen chimed in.
Some legal experts mused on the judicial implications, like Harmeet K. Dhillon, founder and CEO of The Center for American Liberty, who asked, "How do you adjudicate Title VII claims without being able to answer this question? Title IX?"
Babylon Bee CEO Seth Dillon noted that "to say biologists must answer this question is to suggest that womanhood is tied to biology (which is what conservatives argue)."
"If she knows it's a biological question then she knows the answer," American Commitment President Phil Kerpen chimed in.
Some legal experts mused on the judicial implications, like Harmeet K. Dhillon, founder and CEO of The Center for American Liberty, who asked, "How do you adjudicate Title VII claims without being able to answer this question? Title IX?"
Hoosier Daddy
Verified User
it is a legitimate concern, when people who judge let their religious views override legal and scientific facts. any judge who wants to change roe - wade is probably letting their religious views override science. not wanting to define woman is not a big deal, except to stupid fuck right wing goons.
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
If words have no fixed meaning, then they are meaningless...