Ivanka Trump Will Become a Federal Employee

Stretch said:
All he ever did was vote 'present'. Never wrote or voted on 1 piece of legislation.
Click to expand...

Wrong.

Obama acknowledged voting "present" -- a vote similar in its effect to "abstain" -- 129 times during his eight-year state Senate tenure, according to a Boston Globe fact-check at the time. The Globe said that Obama cast about 4,000 votes as an Illinois legislator, meaning that he voted "present" in about one of every 31 votes he took. The New York Times reported that the records show at least 36 occasions in which Obama was either the only state senator to vote present or was part of a group of six or fewer to vote that way.

But this discussion of "present" votes has to do with the Illinois legislature. It has nothing to do with the U.S. Senate.

We checked all of Obama's votes in the U.S. Senate and found not a single "present" vote. That's not surprising, given the way Senate procedure works.

Politifact.com
 
Chlorate said:
-Constitutional law professor
-State senator
-US senator
Click to expand...
US Senator for about six months before he started campaigning........
Also, don't we usually demand more qualifications of unelected officials than of elected ones?
Click to expand...
only if you're a liberal.....

Tell me, what was your reaction when Bush nominated Harriet Myers to SCOTUS?
Click to expand...
to be honest I don't remember......
 
christiefan915 said:
Wrong.

Obama acknowledged voting "present" -- a vote similar in its effect to "abstain" -- 129 times during his eight-year state Senate tenure, according to a Boston Globe fact-check at the time. The Globe said that Obama cast about 4,000 votes as an Illinois legislator, meaning that he voted "present" in about one of every 31 votes he took. The New York Times reported that the records show at least 36 occasions in which Obama was either the only state senator to vote present or was part of a group of six or fewer to vote that way.

But this discussion of "present" votes has to do with the Illinois legislature. It has nothing to do with the U.S. Senate.

We checked all of Obama's votes in the U.S. Senate and found not a single "present" vote. That's not surprising, given the way Senate procedure works.

Politifact.com
Click to expand...

I remember when he sponsored a bill to let doctors murder children born alive if they fucked up the abortion.....
 
PostmodernProphet said:
wasn't she breaking the law even then?......I recall something about missing files......
Click to expand...

Keep trying, liar.

"On November 19, 1998, Independent Counsel Starr testified before the House Judiciary Committee in connection with the Impeachment of Bill Clinton over charges related to the Lewinsky scandal. Here, for the first time, Starr exonerated both President Clinton and the First Lady of complicity in the FBI files matter, saying "while there are outstanding issues that we are attempting to resolve with respect to one individual [we] found no evidence that anyone higher [than Livingstone or Marceca] was in any way involved in ordering the files from the FBI. Second, we have found no evidence that information contained in the files of former officials was used for an improper purpose."[SUP][24][/SUP]
 
christiefan915 said:
Keep trying, liar.

"On November 19, 1998, Independent Counsel Starr testified before the House Judiciary Committee in connection with the Impeachment of Bill Clinton over charges related to the Lewinsky scandal. Here, for the first time, Starr exonerated both President Clinton and the First Lady of complicity in the FBI files matter, saying "while there are outstanding issues that we are attempting to resolve with respect to one individual [we] found no evidence that anyone higher [than Livingstone or Marceca] was in any way involved in ordering the files from the FBI. Second, we have found no evidence that information contained in the files of former officials was used for an improper purpose."[SUP][24][/SUP]
Click to expand...

lol.....stupid Chrispy tries to deflect.....wrong fucking files, liar.....
http://www.nytimes.com/1996/01/06/us/elusive-papers-of-law-firm-are-found-at-white-house.html
 
PostmodernProphet said:
US Senator for about six months before he started campaigning........

only if you're a liberal.....


to be honest I don't remember......
Click to expand...

Even if you don't take seriously the brief time he spent in the US Senate, it seems to me hypocritical of so-called conservatives to discount state legislative experience, given that they're the so-called ideology of localism and federalism. It would make much more sense for a leftist to discount state and community office, because they are the ideology of "DC Only."

Also, so-called conservatives nominated a Republican candidate with zero qualifications to run for president.
 
christiefan915 said:
Ignorant moron with a purposefully vague post that he thinks is a gotcha.....

What was the outcome of that investigation, dummy?
Click to expand...

I think the conclusions are obvious, Chrispy.......the documents of the savings and loan case were so impressed with the integrity and brilliance of your Harvard educated first lady that they escaped from the Rose Law firm and for two years dragged themselves to Washington and made it all the way to a hall table in the WhiteHouse before they were captured and returned to the authorities.......
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top