It's time for the forums leftist Democrats to step up and tell us what their party stands for

ZenMode said:
Does this apply to immigration?

www.uscis.gov

Questions and Answers: Affirmative Asylum Eligibility and Applications | USCIS

www.uscis.gov
Click to expand...
It does because it is the immigration web site and AFFIRMS

8 U.S. Code § 1182 - Inadmissible aliens​

ALERT: Court Order on Circumvention of Lawful Pathways Final Rule

On Aug. 3, 2023, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a stay of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California’s order in East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Biden, 18-cv-06810 (N.D. Cal.), vacating the Circumvention of Lawful Pathways (CLP) rule. At this time and while the stay remains in place, USCIS will continue to apply the CLP rule.

Under the rule, certain individuals who enter the United States through its southwest land border or adjacent coastal borders are presumed to be ineligible for asylum, unless they can demonstrate an exception to the rule or rebut the presumption. Individuals are encouraged to use lawful, safe, and orderly pathways to come to the United States.
 
ZenMode said:
Read the whole thing, not just the part that tells you what you want to believe:

You may apply for asylum if you are at a port of entry or in the United States. You may apply for asylum regardless of your immigration status and within 1 year of your arrival to the United States.
Click to expand...

Key words you brainless dumbass: if you are at a port of entry or in the United States.

I am not sure what part of this you continue to be too stupid to comprehend. :palm:
 
I HAVE MY THUMB UP MY BUTT said:
9wgjcb.gif
Click to expand...
 
Truth Detector said:
I didn't ignore them. You're pretending they are the substance of the amendment and ignoring the primary intent "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof".

But we know why. You're a dishonest, low IQ, mentally deranged, sociopathic lying leftist dumb fuck. In other words, the perfect Kamala voter. ;)
Click to expand...
^ Continues to ignore them.
 
ZenMode said:
I read Title 8. I've also read other immigration policy that specifically says you can apply for asylum up to a year, regardless of immigration status.
Click to expand...
You obviously have NOT read Title 8, since it specifies that illegal aliens are NOT eligible for asylum. They aren't applying for it anyway.
ZenMode said:
I've read the 2nd Amendment. I've also read the related laws that says the US can deny violent felons the right to own a gun.
Click to expand...
There is no such related law. The right of self defense is absolute and inherent.
ZenMode said:
Again, I want to understand all policy, not just the policy that tells me what I want to believe.
Click to expand...
You just want to deny the Constitution of the United States and Title 8.

DON'T TRY TO HIDE BEHIND THE CONSTITUTION YOU DESPISE!!
 
ZenMode said:
Read the whole thing, not just the part that tells you what you want to believe:

You may apply for asylum if you are at a port of entry or in the United States. You may apply for asylum regardless of your immigration status and within 1 year of your arrival to the United States.
Click to expand...
Illegal aliens did not enter at a port of entry, are not applying for asylum, and are not eligible for it anyway.
 
Truth Detector said:
It does because it is the immigration web site and AFFIRMS

8 U.S. Code § 1182 - Inadmissible aliens​

ALERT: Court Order on Circumvention of Lawful Pathways Final Rule

On Aug. 3, 2023, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a stay of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California’s order in East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Biden, 18-cv-06810 (N.D. Cal.), vacating the Circumvention of Lawful Pathways (CLP) rule. At this time and while the stay remains in place, USCIS will continue to apply the CLP rule.

Under the rule, certain individuals who enter the United States through its southwest land border or adjacent coastal borders are presumed to be ineligible for asylum, unless they can demonstrate an exception to the rule or rebut the presumption. Individuals are encouraged to use lawful, safe, and orderly pathways to come to the United States.
Click to expand...
I suspect there's a reason is says "CERTAIN" individuals and not "ALL" individuals... because there have been exceptions made...which you'd know if you read all of the relevant documentation, not just the ones you cherry picked.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top