It's time for the forums leftist Democrats to step up and tell us what their party stands for

[Dutch Uncle]

He'll just create another sock.

I don't have any socks. Also, I consider people who use sock puppets to be sexual perverts akin to flashers, peepers and rapists. Only a weak-minded, cowardly piece of shit would use a sock puppet. Do you agree? Yes or no, please.

You don't answer or fail to say "yes", I understand, son.

 

[Into the Night]

I have.

Blatant lie.

Have you or are you Into-the-Nighting it and reading only the laws that support what you want to believe?

You are still ignoring Title 8.

 

[Into the Night]

I don't have any socks.

Blatant lie.

Also, I consider people who use sock puppets to be sexual perverts akin to flashers, peepers and rapists. Only a weak-minded, cowardly piece of shit would use a sock puppet. Do you agree? Yes or no, please.

You don't answer or fail to say "yes", I understand, son.

I'll let your adolescent posts speak for themselves.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

I SPOON WITH MY SOCKS

 

[Dutch Uncle]

IT'S MY SOAP AND MY SOCK AND I'LL WASH IT AS FAST AS I WANT TO!

 

[ZenMode]

No, you don't. You want to try your strawman fallacy again.

Read Title 8.

I read Title 8. I've also read other immigration policy that specifically says you can apply for asylum up to a year, regardless of immigration status.

I've read the 2nd Amendment. I've also read the related laws that says the US can deny violent felons the right to own a gun.

Again, I want to understand all policy, not just the policy that tells me what I want to believe.

 

[ZenMode]

You have not referenced any law, Void. Go read Title 8.

Questions and Answers: Affirmative Asylum Eligibility and Applications | USCIS

www.uscis.gov

 

[ZenMode]

Blatant lie.

You are still ignoring Title 8.

For the, what, 5th time, I'm looking at ALL policy, not just the policy that tells me what I want to believe.

Why aren't you?

 

[Truth Detector]

And yet multiple laws have been referenced here. Care to explain?

There aren't multiple laws when it comes to immigration. There is the Immigration law.

8 U.S. Code § 1182 - Inadmissible aliens​

8 U.S. Code § 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

www.law.cornell.edu

 

[Truth Detector]

Random words. No apparent coherency.

Mentally deranged child Just described his own posts.

 

[Truth Detector]

I don't have any socks.

You don't have any brains either you loony mentally deranged little man.

Also, I consider people who use sock puppets to be sexual perverts akin to flashers, peepers and rapists. Only a weak-minded, cowardly piece of shit would use a sock puppet. Do you agree? Yes or no, please.

No one cares what you think. You're a loony mentally deranged little boy pretending to be a little man.

You don't answer or fail to say "yes", I understand, son.

You never discuss topics. Nothing but a loony mentally deranged little man with a severely underdeveloped brain.

 

[Truth Detector]

I read Title 8.

No you haven't. Your posts suggest a blatant ignorance of our immigration laws.

I've also read other immigration policy that specifically says you can apply for asylum up to a year, regardless of immigration status.

Link to that bullshit snowflake.

I've read the 2nd Amendment.

The second amendment isn't immigration law halfwit.

I've also read the related laws that says the US can deny violent felons the right to own a gun.

Off topic pointless babbling now.

Again, I want to understand all policy, not just the policy that tells me what I want to believe.

Apparently, you want to pretend that 8 U.S. Code § 1182 - Inadmissible aliens doesn't exist.

 

[Truth Detector]

Questions and Answers: Affirmative Asylum Eligibility and Applications | USCIS

www.uscis.gov

That link destroys your dumb arguments halfwit.

Under the rule, certain individuals who enter the United States through its southwest land border or adjacent coastal borders are presumed to be ineligible for asylum, unless they can demonstrate an exception to the rule or rebut the presumption. Individuals are encouraged to use lawful, safe, and orderly pathways to come to the United States.

 

[Truth Detector]

For the, what, 5th time, I'm looking at ALL policy, not just the policy that tells me what I want to believe.

Why aren't you?

Policy doesn't supplant what the law says. Are you immune from facts and reality? Apparently you are.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

 

[Dutch Uncle]

 

[ZenMode]

There aren't multiple laws when it comes to immigration. There is the Immigration law.

8 U.S. Code § 1182 - Inadmissible aliens​

8 U.S. Code § 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

www.law.cornell.edu

Does this apply to immigration?

Questions and Answers: Affirmative Asylum Eligibility and Applications | USCIS

www.uscis.gov

 

[ZenMode]

No you haven't. Your posts suggest a blatant ignorance of our immigration laws.



Link to that bullshit snowflake.

JFC....for at least the 5 time...

Questions and Answers: Affirmative Asylum Eligibility and Applications | USCIS

www.uscis.gov

 

[ZenMode]

That link destroys your dumb arguments halfwit.

Under the rule, certain individuals who enter the United States through its southwest land border or adjacent coastal borders are presumed to be ineligible for asylum, unless they can demonstrate an exception to the rule or rebut the presumption. Individuals are encouraged to use lawful, safe, and orderly pathways to come to the United States.

Read the whole thing, not just the part that tells you what you want to believe:

You may apply for asylum if you are at a port of entry or in the United States. You may apply for asylum regardless of your immigration status and within 1 year of your arrival to the United States.

 

[ZenMode]

Policy doesn't supplant what the law says. Are you immune from facts and reality? Apparently you are.

If policy violates the law, it can't be policy.