It's time for the forums leftist Democrats to step up and tell us what their party stands for

ZenMode said:
Repeating uninformed nonsense isn't "supporting".
Click to expand...
Projection

The process of displacing one’s feelings onto a different person, animal, or object. The term is most commonly used to describe defensive projection—attributing one’s own unacceptable urges to another.
 
Trump Dummy said:
9wgjcb.gif
Click to expand...
Your life is ending. Soon you will burn in Hell for your many sins, Trump Dummy. You're free to blame others, but that's a sin too since it's you who are at fault.

time-wasting.gif
 
Truth Detector said:
:lolup: Another reason you cannot argue with dishonest lying leftist morons. :laugh:
Click to expand...
He never even linked to any immigration law at all. Even if he did, he'd be selective about it, ignoring the exceptions listed in the law. One of them is illegal aliens. They are simply not eligible for asylum. This tactic is called a cherry picking fallacy.

Also note his use of 'asylum'. He immediately assumes that anyone entering the United States is automatically seeking asylum. This is a compositional error fallacy.

As he denies these fallacies he's committing, he's making an argument of the Stone fallacy and outright denying logic.

Yeah...you have a point.
 
Into the Night said:
There is only one source.
Click to expand...
As long as you ignore the second source that I provided, which also came from the federal government. FYI, the federal government is the source for federal immigration laws and policies.
Into the Night said:
You just still want to ignore it.
Click to expand...
I'm not ignoring anything. I am looking at all available information, not just information from the source that tells me what I want to believe. That would be called confirmation bias.
Into the Night said:
Pivoting to unrelated material won't help you.
Click to expand...
Unrelated... As long as you ignore the fact that it is directly related. :laugh:
 
ZenMode said:
As long as you ignore the second source that I provided, which also came from the federal government. FYI, the federal government is the source for federal immigration laws and policies.

I'm not ignoring anything. I am looking at all available information, not just information from the source that tells me what I want to believe. That would be called confirmation bias.

Unrelated... As long as you ignore the fact that it is directly related. :laugh:
Click to expand...
Sybil is cray-cray. He only sees what he wants to see.
 
Into the Night said:
Click to expand...
Into the Night said:
He never even linked to any immigration law at all.
Click to expand...

It's time for the forums leftist Democrats to step up and tell us what their party stands for

That wasn't a legal port of entry you brainless dullard. Where was it? Good lord, you are one stupid mother fucker. And stubbornly so. Again, cite the laws you claim support your arguments. You may apply for asylum if you are at a port of entry or in the United States. You may apply for...
www.justplainpolitics.com www.justplainpolitics.com
 
ZenMode said:

It's time for the forums leftist Democrats to step up and tell us what their party stands for

That wasn't a legal port of entry you brainless dullard. Where was it? Good lord, you are one stupid mother fucker. And stubbornly so. Again, cite the laws you claim support your arguments. You may apply for asylum if you are at a port of entry or in the United States. You may apply for...
www.justplainpolitics.com www.justplainpolitics.com
Click to expand...
Still can't respond to the thread topic, halfwit?

Let's try this; what do YOU stand for?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top