Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
THINK...you fool....THINK.....put together WHEN said video was shot, and then apply that to the excerpt I posted. And why is there ONLY an edited version available? READ the underlined:
A reconstruction of the events shows that the conservative challenges largely sprang from a mislabeled video that was shot later in the day.
Breitbart posted two columns on his Web site saying the claims were fabricated. Both led with a 48-second YouTube video showing Lewis, Carson, other Congressional Black Caucus members and staffers leaving the Capitol. Some of the group were videotaping the booing crowd.
Breitbart asked why the epithet was not captured by the black lawmakers' cameras, and why nobody reacted as if they had heard the slur. He also questioned whether the epithets could have been shouted by liberals planted in the crowd.
But the 48-second video was shot as the group was leaving the Capitol -- at least one hour after Lewis, D-Ga., and Carson walked to the Capitol, which is when they said the slurs were used.
Bottom line. You cannot disprove or refute the FACTS and LOGIC in the excerpt I provided...so instead you just keep repeating a moot point as if it's a separate entity onto itself.
Keep squawking, my little neocon parrot....delude yourself that it's the only reality you need.
Again Libbie, your side made the accusation. The burden of proof thus lies with you or your side. My side has even offered to pay y'all $100,000 to do it.
Your "side" is as full of it as you are.....because to date your "side" built it's case on a video that: ".... was shot as the group was leaving the Capitol -- at least one hour after Lewis, D-Ga., and Carson walked to the Capitol, which is when they said the slurs were used."
You and your "side" IGNORE THE FACT OF THE CNN WITNESS TO THE EVENT. So essentially, you and your "side" are just calling everyone else a liar because you don't want to believe any negative press about teabaggers. You and your "side" made a case that when analyzied, didn't pan out...so you and your "side" create yet another false premise....unless there's a video, you don't believe the report. An interesting premise, given that the VAST MAJORITY of the news you and I read DOES NOT HAVE AUDIO OR VIDEO. So by your "logic" any yahoo can call a news report "false" because there's no audio or video...especially if it doesn't suit their socio-political ideology.
Now all you'll do is just ignore what I just said and parrot talking point the neocon punditry handed you...because either you're too stubborn to admit that Breibart's story just doesn't hold water or because your just too damned dumb to understand the consequences of the rhetoric you parrot.