It's all in the timing!

So the claim of teabag supporters that there's no "proof" of the teabagging racist slurs against black congressmen does not ring true
Click to expand...
if the claim there is no proof is not true, I expect you have some proof?....
 
Taichiliberal said:
Wrong video of health protest spurs N-word feud

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_n_word_feud


So the claim of teabag supporters that there's no "proof" of the teabagging racist slurs against black congressmen does not ring true.....what a shock! :eek:
Click to expand...

Here you have four Democrats who went through a crowd with linked arms, reminiscent of 1960's Civil Rights marches, an obvious attempt to get a reaction, with media present and hundreds of people with cameras, video devices and cell phone cameras, and they failed to get the reaction that they hoped for. So they made up this story that the crowd chanted "N-----, N-----".

Then this guy Lee Fang of the liberal American Progress think tank who says he heard the crowd chant "N-----, N-----" posts his video on Youtube claiming it as proof. The only problem with the video is that it disproves Fang's charge. So Breitbart picks it up and posts it on his site as evidence that these Liberals are lying.

Now you, Libbie, try to claim that since Fang's video doesn't show the TEA members using racial slurs, that it somehow proves that Breitbart is lying.

See the way this works Libbie is that if someone makes an accusation it is their responsibility to back it up. Breitbart did, you Liberals failed to. In fact Breitbart offered to pay anyone $100,000 for evidence backing up the Liberals claim.
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
Wrong video of health protest spurs N-word feud

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_n_word_feud


So the claim of teabag supporters that there's no "proof" of the teabagging racist slurs against black congressmen does not ring true.....what a shock!
Click to expand...

Southern Man said:
Here you have four Democrats who went through a crowd with linked arms, reminiscent of 1960's Civil Rights marches, an obvious attempt to get a reaction, with media present and hundreds of people with cameras, video devices and cell phone cameras, and they failed to get the reaction that they hoped for. So they made up this story that the crowd chanted "N-----, N-----".

Says who? YOU? Yeah, your revisionist bullshit and a metro card will only get a bus ride. Interesting how you turn a bunch of Congressmen facing a crowd of yahoos from victims to agigtators. I swear Southie, your blathering make David Duke's bullshit seem almost plausible by comparison.

Then this guy Lee Fang of the liberal American Progress think tank who says he heard the crowd chant "N-----, N-----" posts his video on Youtube claiming it as proof. The only problem with the video is that it disproves Fang's charge. So Breitbart picks it up and posts it on his site as evidence that these Liberals are lying.

And as the article I posted points out.....the time to which this video appears is NOT on the same time frame as the event AS WITNESSED BY A CNN REPORTER.

Now you, Libbie, try to claim that since Fang's video dosen't show the TEA members using racial slurs, that it somehow proves that Breitbart is lying.

Stop lying...the article spells out in details why Breibart is full of it, because like you HE JUST IGNORES FACTS AND INFORMATION THAT DON'T FIT HIS ASSERTIONS AND BELIEFS, AND KEEPS REPEATING HIS CLAIMS.

See the way this works Libbie is that if someone makes an accusation it is their responsibility to back it up. Breitbart did, you Liberals failed to. In fact Breitbart offered to pay anyone $100,000 for evidence backing up the Liberals claim.
Click to expand...

:palm: Essentially, Southie just ignores what the article I linked points out, and then gives his personal version of the bullshit Briebart tries to pass off.....typical neocon revisionist bullshit by a willfully ignorant parrot.


THIS is how it works Southie,

http://mediamatters.org/blog/201004140009
 
Last edited:
Taichiliberal said:
:palm: Essentially, Southie just ignores what the article I linked points out, and then gives his personal version of the bullshit Briebart tries to pass off.....typical neocon revisionist bullshit by a willfully ignorant parrot.


THIS is how it works Southie,
Click to expand...

I read your linked article Libbie. You interpreted it wrong. My summary is logical, based on all information available, and accurate. The fact that you now blow up into a hissy fit like this proves this.

Its been three weeks since this happened. Where is the video evidence backing up the accusation of racism? Doesn't anyone want $100,000?
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
Essentially, Southie just ignores what the article I linked points out, and then gives his personal version of the bullshit Briebart tries to pass off.....typical neocon revisionist bullshit by a willfully ignorant parrot.


THIS is how it works Southie,
Click to expand...

Southern Man said:
I read your linked article Libbie. You interpreted it wrong. My summary is logical, based on all information available, and accurate. The fact that you now blow up into a hissy fit like this proves this.

Its been three weeks since this happened. Where is the video evidence backing up the accusation of racism? Doesn't anyone want $100,000?
Click to expand...

There is NOTHING to "interpret", you dunce! That is your problem, you keep treating your opinion, supposition and conjecture as fact. It's NOT. The article clearly lays out the chain of events and the FACTS that does NOT support Briebart's insipid stubborness.

A reconstruction of the events shows that the conservative challenges largely sprang from a mislabeled video that was shot later in the day.

Breitbart posted two columns on his Web site saying the claims were fabricated. Both led with a 48-second YouTube video showing Lewis, Carson, other Congressional Black Caucus members and staffers leaving the Capitol. Some of the group were videotaping the booing crowd.

Breitbart asked why the epithet was not captured by the black lawmakers' cameras, and why nobody reacted as if they had heard the slur. He also questioned whether the epithets could have been shouted by liberals planted in the crowd.

But the 48-second video was shot as the group was leaving the Capitol -- at least one hour after Lewis, D-Ga., and Carson walked to the Capitol, which is when they said the slurs were used.

But please Southie....DO pretend that logic and facts only exists when you want them to...and continue to be a willfully ignorant neocon parrot for Breibart's BS.
 
Taichiliberal said:
There is NOTHING to "interpret", you dunce! That is your problem, you keep treating your opinion, supposition and conjecture as fact. It's NOT. The article clearly lays out the chain of events and the FACTS that does NOT support Briebart's insipid stubborness.

A reconstruction of the events shows that the conservative challenges largely sprang from a mislabeled video that was shot later in the day.

Breitbart posted two columns on his Web site saying the claims were fabricated. Both led with a 48-second YouTube video showing Lewis, Carson, other Congressional Black Caucus members and staffers leaving the Capitol. Some of the group were videotaping the booing crowd.

Breitbart asked why the epithet was not captured by the black lawmakers' cameras, and why nobody reacted as if they had heard the slur. He also questioned whether the epithets could have been shouted by liberals planted in the crowd.

But the 48-second video was shot as the group was leaving the Capitol -- at least one hour after Lewis, D-Ga., and Carson walked to the Capitol, which is when they said the slurs were used.

But please Southie....DO pretend that logic and facts only exists when you want them to...and continue to be a willfully ignorant neocon parrot for Breibart's BS.
Click to expand...

Libbie, as I stated previously:
this guy Lee Fang of the liberal American Progress think tank who says he heard the crowd chant "N-----, N-----" posts his video on Youtube claiming it as proof. The only problem with the video is that it disproves Fang's charge. So Breitbart picks it up and posts it on his site as evidence that these Liberals are lying.
Click to expand...

THAT was the video that your side claimed was proof.

So far no one has offered a video of the first incident, of the four Democrats with crossed arms, proving their claim, and that's in spite of a $100,000 award.
 
:palm:
Southern Man said:
Libbie, as I stated previously:

THAT was the video that your side claimed was proof.

So far no one has offered a video of the first incident, of the four Democrats with crossed arms, proving their claim, and that's in spite of a $100,000 award.
Click to expand...


THINK...you fool....THINK.....put together WHEN said video was shot, and then apply that to the excerpt I posted. And why is there ONLY an edited version available? READ the underlined:

A reconstruction of the events shows that the conservative challenges largely sprang from a mislabeled video that was shot later in the day.

Breitbart posted two columns on his Web site saying the claims were fabricated. Both led with a 48-second YouTube video showing Lewis, Carson, other Congressional Black Caucus members and staffers leaving the Capitol. Some of the group were videotaping the booing crowd.

Breitbart asked why the epithet was not captured by the black lawmakers' cameras, and why nobody reacted as if they had heard the slur. He also questioned whether the epithets could have been shouted by liberals planted in the crowd.

But the 48-second video was shot as the group was leaving the Capitol -- at least one hour after Lewis, D-Ga., and Carson walked to the Capitol, which is when they said the slurs were used.


Bottom line. You cannot disprove or refute the FACTS and LOGIC in the excerpt I provided...so instead you just keep repeating a moot point as if it's a separate entity onto itself.

Keep squawking, my little neocon parrot....delude yourself that it's the only reality you need.
 
Last edited:
And after all that .... can you say....Mr. TC Peckerhead has NO PROOF and is trying to pass off the lies of a far-left wing blog as if it means anything....:lol:
 
Taichiliberal said:
:palm:


THINK...you fool....THINK.....put together WHEN said video was shot, and then apply that to the excerpt I posted. And why is there ONLY an edited version available? READ the underlined:

A reconstruction of the events shows that the conservative challenges largely sprang from a mislabeled video that was shot later in the day.

Breitbart posted two columns on his Web site saying the claims were fabricated. Both led with a 48-second YouTube video showing Lewis, Carson, other Congressional Black Caucus members and staffers leaving the Capitol. Some of the group were videotaping the booing crowd.

Breitbart asked why the epithet was not captured by the black lawmakers' cameras, and why nobody reacted as if they had heard the slur. He also questioned whether the epithets could have been shouted by liberals planted in the crowd.

But the 48-second video was shot as the group was leaving the Capitol -- at least one hour after Lewis, D-Ga., and Carson walked to the Capitol, which is when they said the slurs were used.


Bottom line. You cannot disprove or refute the FACTS and LOGIC in the excerpt I provided...so instead you just keep repeating a moot point as if it's a separate entity onto itself.

Keep squawking, my little neocon parrot....delude yourself that it's the only reality you need.
Click to expand...

Again Libbie, your side made the accusation. The burden of proof thus lies with you or your side. My side has even offered to pay y'all $100,000 to do it.
 
bravo said:
And after all that .... can you say....Mr. TC Peckerhead has NO PROOF and is trying to pass off the lies of a far-left wing blog as if it means anything....:lol:
Click to expand...

See folks, this is the mindset of the willfully ignorant neocon/birther/teabagger.... deductive reasoning, logic based on ALL the facts are NOT in their vocabulary....it's what they can insinuated with half-truths, partial information and a LOT of supposition and conjecture that helps them maintain their beliefs. All they need is to REPEAT ad nauseum the forementioned as an answer to all contrary information and analysis, and they are smugly content.

But as our intellectually impotent friend above shows, all the condescending attitude and faux hysterics can't erase the following:

But the 48-second video was shot as the group was leaving the Capitol -- at least one hour after Lewis, D-Ga., and Carson walked to the Capitol, which is when they said the slurs were used.

"Bravo", indeed. :palm:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top