It must be the water in Georgia or something...

T. A. Gardner

T. A. Gardner

Serial Thread Killer
The same grand jury that indicted Trump recommended indicting three Republican Senators as well. The crazy in all of these indictments is starting to boil over.

Georgia grand jury recommended charges against 3 US senators who are allies to Donald Trump
The special grand jury investigated Donald Trump from June to December 2022 and interviewed 75 witnesses, but wasn't authorized to return indictments.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...ue-kelly-loeffler-cleta-mitchell/70793991007/

I guess at this point, in blue territory if you are a Republican you are presumed guilty of something just by the party you're in...

Kafka, meet Stalin... The US has gone full Turd World Banana Republic dictatorship now...
 
Lindsey Graham was one, what fucking business does he have calling Georgia on Trumps behalf. the shithead should be prosecuted.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
The same grand jury that indicted Trump recommended indicting three Republican Senators as well.
Click to expand...

It seems you can't even get simple facts straight.

The first GJ didn't indict anyone. It made recommendations. Their recommendations were released today.
The purpose of the first GJ was to investigate since they had the power to issue subpoenas. They had no power to indict anyone.

The second GJ indicted Trump. Those indictments were released last month.

Georgia grand jury recommended charges against 3 US senators who are allies to Donald Trump
The special grand jury investigated Donald Trump from June to December 2022 and interviewed 75 witnesses, but wasn't authorized to return indictments.
Click to expand...
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
It seems you can't even get simple facts straight.

The first GJ didn't indict anyone. It made recommendations. Their recommendations were released today.
The purpose of the first GJ was to investigate since they had the power to issue subpoenas. They had no power to indict anyone.

The second GJ indicted Trump. Those indictments were released last month.
Click to expand...

No, you are missing the point. This grand jury was willing to go after several Republican Senators, anyone associated with Trump, Trump, and likely would have been amenable to charging half the country if they could because they didn't vote the way they should have or something.
 
TA Gardner believes Republican presidents have the right to ask a State Voting Official to overthrow an election!

Otherwise, we would not be having this discussion here today!

This is plain and simple folks!

NEXT!
 
T. A. Gardner said:
No, you are missing the point. This grand jury was willing to go after several Republican Senators, anyone associated with Trump, Trump, and likely would have been amenable to charging half the country if they could because they didn't vote the way they should have or something.
Click to expand...

You are willfully ignorant.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
The same grand jury that indicted Trump recommended indicting three Republican Senators as well. The crazy in all of these indictments is starting to boil over.

Georgia grand jury recommended charges against 3 US senators who are allies to Donald Trump
The special grand jury investigated Donald Trump from June to December 2022 and interviewed 75 witnesses, but wasn't authorized to return indictments.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...ue-kelly-loeffler-cleta-mitchell/70793991007/

I guess at this point, in blue territory if you are a Republican you are presumed guilty of something just by the party you're in...

Kafka, meet Stalin... The US has gone full Turd World Banana Republic dictatorship now...
Click to expand...

More likely, if you are a ass kisser for Trump anytime you get caught breaking the law your lemmings will assume you have been victimized
 
BartenderElite said:
And what's the difference again? I mean, in terms of being a weak offering when a debate isn't going well?
Click to expand...

An insult is something foisted on the person with nothing about the topic subject. Ad hominem is attacking the person about the subject.

ad-hominem-examples.png


That is with ad hominem you are making a counter argument using nothing but an insult, while an insult is just an insult.

The statement I made was an insult because it didn't address the argument. Instead, it set an insulting condition for you to continue debate. Ad hominem would have been something like You can't figure it out because you're in a political comma.

The difference can be subtle, but the key factor is whether it is intended as rebuttal using insults, or as simply an insult with no rebuttal in it.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
An insult is something foisted on the person with nothing about the topic subject. Ad hominem is attacking the person about the subject.

ad-hominem-examples.png


That is with ad hominem you are making a counter argument using nothing but an insult, while an insult is just an insult.

The statement I made was an insult because it didn't address the argument. Instead, it set an insulting condition for you to continue debate. Ad hominem would have been something like You can't figure it out because you're in a political comma.

The difference can be subtle, but the key factor is whether it is intended as rebuttal using insults, or as simply an insult with no rebuttal in it.
Click to expand...

That IS subtle.

No doubt.

But thank you for the explanation.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top