It looks like the jury is giving it thought.

They were all racist white supremacists who were hoping that there would be looting.

It was a slow night, and everyone else was smart enough to recognize that the hunting was going to suck that night.

you are a lying sack of shit - a sub human low life

you go on forums and lie about people. who does that? sociopaths are who does it
 
They were all racist white supremacists who were hoping that there would be looting.

It was a slow night, and everyone else was smart enough to recognize that the hunting was going to suck that night.

isn't it odd that no black people were shot.....only 3 white bullies........
 
you are lying, little hate filled lefty


looks like you have some selective amnesia..........even one of the leftist heroes, Ana Kasparian admitted she was all wrong about the events of that night........
You are horribly uninformed.

But you rely on Fox News, so that's not a surprise. Rittenhouse was recorded saying that he's going there to 'shoot looters'.
 
They were all racist white supremacists who were hoping that there would be looting.

It was a slow night, and everyone else was smart enough to recognize that the hunting was going to suck that night.

Too funny. What's scary is that there are actually people that believe that.
There are also dummies that think the kid only killed blacks.
 
Too funny. What's scary is that there are actually people that believe that.
There are also dummies that think the kid only killed blacks.
No. What's 'scary' is that otherwise somewhat intelligent people lie about what happened that night because it makes (you) feel better.

Of course, all that matters is that he gets 'self defensed' by someone when he gets off.
 
I'm fairly sure that they've prosecuted a few more gun crime cases than you have. ;)

Not from the look of it. They botched Wisconsin gun laws in cross examining Rittenhouse. Then one persecutor took a firearm in evidence, shouldered it, and pointed at people in the courtroom. That is normally considered a criminal act. You'd think they'd know better...
 
Not from the look of it. They botched Wisconsin gun laws in cross examining Rittenhouse. Then one persecutor took a firearm in evidence, shouldered it, and pointed at people in the courtroom. That is normally considered a criminal act. You'd think they'd know better...

He did not point it at people. Gods, can you people EVER tell the truth about *anything*? I found only two sources in four pages of Google returns when I queried "Did Rittenhouse prosecutor point gun at jury"... and both were alt-RW biased media.

From AP:

"KENOSHA, Wis. (AP) — A defense lawyer angrily accused the prosecution at Kyle Rittenhouse’s murder trial of lying. The lead prosecutor struck a measured tone, even as he raised the accused’s rifle at one point and sighted at a courtroom wall.
"

https://apnews.com/article/kyle-rittenhouse-trial-kenosha-46770144a2673b7e8414dfc0c5aff9a9
 
He did not point it at people. Gods, can you people EVER tell the truth about *anything*? I found only two sources in four pages of Google returns when I queried "Did Rittenhouse prosecutor point gun at jury"... and both were alt-RW biased media.

From AP:

"KENOSHA, Wis. (AP) — A defense lawyer angrily accused the prosecution at Kyle Rittenhouse’s murder trial of lying. The lead prosecutor struck a measured tone, even as he raised the accused’s rifle at one point and sighted at a courtroom wall.
"

https://apnews.com/article/kyle-rittenhouse-trial-kenosha-46770144a2673b7e8414dfc0c5aff9a9


He pointed it at the jury. You can see it. That he had his finger on the trigger makes it even more egregious. This is the sort of stupidity that got two people shot by Alec Baldwin...
 
Back
Top