My question is solely for evince using her logic. I get your point.is it also a choice to not buy a firearm because of excess taxes, license fees, background checks?
Sent from my LG-D631 using Tapatalk
My question is solely for evince using her logic. I get your point.is it also a choice to not buy a firearm because of excess taxes, license fees, background checks?
My question is solely for evince using her logic. I get your point.
go get the post of mine you claim exists you fucking liar
because you don't have to work somewhere
its a choice to be employed
According to Desh, welfare isn't a choice; woking is.
HERE:
According to Desh, welfare isn't a choice; woking is.
She's right.
Sometimes I choose to cook with my wok...sometimes I choose to use something else.
fucking liar
wok asshole
it was a joke
you spelled work wok
It is a choice to take welfare too then.
Sent from my LG-D631 using Tapatalk
So, Zappa claims I won't discuss anything, and here is proof I have tried to discuss things with him and he refuses to respond.

My mother is an 84 year old retired professor of health technologies.
She has never done illegal drugs, she voted to legalize it.
Of course it you retarded freak.
Renters can deduct 1/2 OF their rent and those that deduct child care costs had to first PAY child care costs.
people who deduct a million dollar charitable contribution also have to pay it first...........why should people be allowed a tax deduction for child care?.......what is "fair" about it.......
It is a cost of doing business dufus.
?....what the fuck does a blacksmith know about business?......do the horses examine your tax returns to see if they will allow you to lift their hind legs?.....
Yea you are missing the point here and so have all the other conservatives who have evaded answering my question of "what is wrong with this?".
I'll make this easier for you and explain why you're not getting the point. The point here is that requiring anyone to take a drug test to receive any government benefit or service is a violation of their constitutionally protected right to a presumption of innocence and to not be coerced to testify against themselves.
So the congress lady from Wisconsin is right, if we can violate the constitutional rights of the poor to politically demonize them, then why can't we violate the rights of the wealthy to demonize them?
That's the problem with these laws demonizing the poor. If they can do this to the segment of the population least able to resist these sort of unconstitutional measures than they can do it to you. They can violate your constitutional rights in order for you to receive any government service or benefit.
That's what's wrong with this question.
Then they can require a drug test for any government service or benefit.Employers can require employees to submit to drug tests, so GovCo can require welfare recipients to submit as well.