Israel orders forcible deportation of Palestinian human rights defender Salah Hammour

M

McRocket

New member
'Palestinian human rights lawyer Salah Hammouri, who is currently imprisoned by Israel, has been ordered by the Israeli state to be deported on December 4th, following the revocation of his Jerusalem residency status.

Last year the Israeli government revoked the Jerusalem residency of Hammouri, a dual Palestinian-French citizen who was born in Jerusalem, on the basis of “breach of allegiance” to the state. The decision comes after an Israeli Supreme Court ruling back in July that allowed for stripping citizenship or Jerusalem residency status from those found in “breach of loyalty” to the state.

Over the past two decades, Hammouri has spent more than eight years in Israeli prisons, with several stints in administrative detention – a policy used by Israel against Palestinians allowing for indefinite detention without charge or trial.'

...

'Hammouri was born and raised in Jerusalem, and has called the city his home his entire life. He is one of more than 370,000 Palestinians residents of Jerusalem, which was illegally annexed by Israel in 1967.'

https://mondoweiss.net/2022/12/isra...stinian-human-rights-defender-salah-hammouri/


And the tradition of Israeli leaders treating the Palestinian's like human scum...continues.
 
.
It's bullshit he's not a lawyer he's a terrorist. The Guardian is the house propaganda organ for the PFLP, truly loathsome newspaper.

Guardian corrects article on convicted terrorist Salah Hamouri.

A Guardian piece by Bethan McKernan refers to Salah Hamouri as a “human rights lawyer” (“Human rights lawyer in Israeli prison goes on hunger strike“, Sept. 28), despite acknowledging – in the 8th paragraph – his 2005 conviction for plotting to assassinate Israel’s former Chief Rabbi.

Hamouri, a French-Palestinian whose conviction also included terrorism funding, and recruitment for the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP) terrorist group, was released in December 2011 as part of a swap for Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit.

The Guardian piece begins with the following grossly misleading omission about his current detention:

A prominent Palestinian-French human rights lawyer has gone on hunger strike in protest against his imprisonment without charge by Israeli authorities for the last six months.

As we noted in a complaint to Guardian editors this morning, at the time of his detention, it was reported that Hamouri was accused of being a member of PFLP, designated as a terrorist organisation by the US, EU, Canada, and Israel.

Our complaint was upheld, and the following paragraph added:

In a statement, the Israel Defence Forces (IDF) said that Hamouri was detained on suspicion of activity in the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, which is designated as a terrorist organisation by Israel’s western allies.

Though we commend editors for the correction, the fact that McKernan referred to a convicted Palestinian terrorist as a “human rights” lawyer is another example of how the Guardian’s coverage of the region can be best described as pro-Palestinian advocacy, rather than real journalism.

https://camera-uk.org/2022/09/29/guardian-corrects-article-on-convicted-terrorist-salah-hamouri/
 
Last edited:
'Salah Hamouri (Arabic: صلاح حموري) (born 25 April 1985[1] to a French mother and a Palestinian father,) is a Palestinian lawyer and field researcher for the Addameer Prisoner Support and Human Rights Association.[2] His wife – who is French – has been barred since January 2016 from entering Israel or the Occupied West Bank to visit him.[2][3]

Hamouri was arrested in 2005 and accused of plotting to murder Ovadia Yosef, the former Sephardic Chief Rabbi of Israel. After over 3 years' detention without trial,[4] on the advice of his lawyer, while protesting his innocence he admitted culpability in a plea bargain in order to avoid a 14-year term of imprisonment, and was condemned by a military tribunal to serve a 7 year sentence.[3] A number of committees have formed to protest against his treatment and affirm his innocence.[3][5] Hamouri was released in exchange for the return of the Israeli POW Gilad Shalit in December 2011.[6]

He has been repeatedly placed under a regime of administrative detention – which Amnesty International considers 'a major human rights violation'[7] – a procedure depriving people of their personal liberty[8] by arresting and keeping them in custody, without laying charges or putting them on trial. The procedure can be repeated indefinitely.[9][8] It has been claimed that he has been held in detention for a crime of opinion.[10]'

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salah_Hamouri


Israel - the Apartheid of the 21'st century.
 
Last edited:
Can something be illegally annexed? Putin took Crimea a couple of years ago and everyone was fine with it. I bet this entire thing now ends up with some land changing hands as well. If it was done in this century why isnt a country winning a war and annexxing territory last century valid?
 
McRocket said:
'Salah Hamouri (Arabic: صلاح حموري) (born 25 April 1985[1] to a French mother and a Palestinian father,) is a Palestinian lawyer and field researcher for the Addameer Prisoner Support and Human Rights Association.[2] His wife – who is French – has been barred since January 2016 from entering Israel or the Occupied West Bank to visit him.[2][3]

Hamouri was arrested in 2005 and accused of plotting to murder Ovadia Yosef, the former Sephardic Chief Rabbi of Israel. After over 3 years' detention without trial,[4] on the advice of his lawyer, while protesting his innocence he admitted culpability in a plea bargain in order to avoid a 14-year term of imprisonment, and was condemned by a military tribunal to serve a 7 year sentence.[3] A number of committees have formed to protest against his treatment and affirm his innocence.[3][5] Hamouri was released in exchange for the return of the Israeli POW Gilad Shalit in December 2011.[6]

He has been repeatedly placed under a regime of administrative detention – which Amnesty International considers 'a major human rights violation'[7] – a procedure depriving people of their personal liberty[8] by arresting and keeping them in custody, without laying charges or putting them on trial. The procedure can be repeated indefinitely.[9][8] It has been claimed that he has been held in detention for a crime of opinion.[10]'

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salah_Hamouri


Israel - the Apartheid of the 21'st century.
Click to expand...

.
 
McRocket said:
'Palestinian human rights lawyer Salah Hammouri, who is currently imprisoned by Israel, has been ordered by the Israeli state to be deported on December 4th, following the revocation of his Jerusalem residency status.

Last year the Israeli government revoked the Jerusalem residency of Hammouri, a dual Palestinian-French citizen who was born in Jerusalem, on the basis of “breach of allegiance” to the state. The decision comes after an Israeli Supreme Court ruling back in July that allowed for stripping citizenship or Jerusalem residency status from those found in “breach of loyalty” to the state.

Over the past two decades, Hammouri has spent more than eight years in Israeli prisons, with several stints in administrative detention – a policy used by Israel against Palestinians allowing for indefinite detention without charge or trial.'

...

'Hammouri was born and raised in Jerusalem, and has called the city his home his entire life. He is one of more than 370,000 Palestinians residents of Jerusalem, which was illegally annexed by Israel in 1967.'

https://mondoweiss.net/2022/12/isra...stinian-human-rights-defender-salah-hammouri/


And the tradition of Israeli leaders treating the Palestinian's like human scum...continues.
Click to expand...

He was arrested for allegedly conspiring to kill someone.
 
tsuke said:
Can something be illegally annexed? Putin took Crimea a couple of years ago and everyone was fine with it. I bet this entire thing now ends up with some land changing hands as well. If it was done in this century why isnt a country winning a war and annexxing territory last century valid?
Click to expand...

Everyone was not "fine with it". Sanctions were put on Russia, and they were expelled from the G8, now the G7.

You really don't know shit.
 
LurchAddams said:
Everyone was not "fine with it". Sanctions were put on Russia, and they were expelled from the G8, now the G7.

You really don't know shit.
Click to expand...

Did they take it back and give it to Ukraine? If I remmember correctly they even held the olympics in Russia later that year
 
tsuke said:
Did they take it back and give it to Ukraine? If I remmember correctly they even held the olympics in Russia later that year
Click to expand...

What the fuck does that have to do with anything? You said "everyone was fine with it". Just admit your stupidity and move on, toilet boy.
 
McRocket said:
And the tradition of Israeli leaders treating the Palestinian's like human scum...continues.
Click to expand...


They usually murder their opposition, political leaders, kids in the streets, journalists, American or otherwise. The latest journalist that they murdered was high-profile and the shit that hit the fan becomes denser and more widespread by the week. That's probably why the scum didn't murder Salah Hammouri.

Congratulations on openly supporting law and justice when Israelis are the criminals. Most members here are too timid- spineless or corrupt like the obnoxious, ethnic-cleansing supportive Brit maggot.

Here's a Guardian video of the Neo-Zionist scum attacking a Palestinian funeral with clubs and tasers. It's the sort of report that prosemitic assholes want censored;



There will be a reckoning.
 
Last edited:
tsuke said:
Can something be illegally annexed?
Click to expand...

No. Occupation and annexation are prohibited under international law , the UN Charter and the Geneva Conventions.

Putin took Crimea a couple of years ago and everyone was fine with it. I bet this entire thing now ends up with some land changing hands as well. If it was done in this century why isnt a country winning a war and annexxing territory last century valid?
Click to expand...

The illegality of occupation and annexation by force is a product of modern international law, from the early 1920s through to the creation of the United nations in 1945. Earlier conquests were not subject to such humanitarian laws. We are improving as a species.

Well, some of us. The Israeli assholes ignore the law- and Washington supports them. For this reason the US- and its allies- have no moral say in Russia's apparent transgressions.
These are debatable under law anyway as their occupations came as a result of requests from the inhabitants. That's not ' taking by force '.
 
moon said:
No. Occupation and annexation are prohibited under international law , the UN Charter and the Geneva Conventions.



The illegality of occupation and annexation by force is a product of modern international law, from the early 1920s through to the creation of the United nations in 1945. Earlier conquests were not subject to such humanitarian laws. We are improving as a species.

Well, some of us. The Israeli assholes ignore the law- and Washington supports them. For this reason the US- and its allies- have no moral say in Russia's apparent transgressions.
These are debatable under law anyway as their occupations came as a result of requests from the inhabitants. That's not ' taking by force '.
Click to expand...

Thats a good point. The land was previously Jordans if I understand correctly. If they give their ok can Israel have it?
 
moon said:
They usually murder their opposition, political leaders, kids in the streets, journalists, American or otherwise. The latest journalist that they murdered was high-profile and the shit that hit the fan becomes denser and more widespread by the week. That's probably why the scum didn't murder Salah Hammouri.

Congratulations on openly supporting law and justice when Israelis are the criminals. Most members here are too timid- spineless or corrupt like the obnoxious, ethnic-cleansing supportive Brit maggot.

Here's a Guardian video of the Neo-Zionist scum attacking a Palestinian funeral with clubs and tasers. It's the sort of report that prosemitic assholes want censored;



There will be a reckoning.
Click to expand...

For the sake of the Palestinian's?
I wish it would come soon.
 
tsuke said:
Thats a good point. The land was previously Jordans if I understand correctly. If they give their ok can Israel have it?
Click to expand...

It was British at the point of legal division- and the British gave half of it to a bunch of European Ashkenazis via UN resolution 181 in 1947. Of course, the same applied to the other half for Arabs- who already owned it. Arrogant fuckers, those colonialist Brits.
 
moon said:
It was British at the point of legal division- and the British gave half of it to a bunch of European Ashkenazis via UN resolution 181 in 1947. Of course, the same applied to the other half for Arabs- who already owned it. Arrogant fuckers, those colonialist Brits.
Click to expand...

I think we can all agree at least that Brits are arrogant fuckers.
 
Primavera said:
.
It's bullshit he's not a lawyer he's a terrorist. The Guardian is the house propaganda organ for the PFLP, truly loathsome newspaper.

Guardian corrects article on convicted terrorist Salah Hamouri.

A Guardian piece by Bethan McKernan refers to Salah Hamouri as a “human rights lawyer” (“Human rights lawyer in Israeli prison goes on hunger strike“, Sept. 28), despite acknowledging – in the 8th paragraph – his 2005 conviction for plotting to assassinate Israel’s former Chief Rabbi.

Hamouri, a French-Palestinian whose conviction also included terrorism funding, and recruitment for the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP) terrorist group, was released in December 2011 as part of a swap for Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit.

The Guardian piece begins with the following grossly misleading omission about his current detention:

A prominent Palestinian-French human rights lawyer has gone on hunger strike in protest against his imprisonment without charge by Israeli authorities for the last six months.

As we noted in a complaint to Guardian editors this morning, at the time of his detention, it was reported that Hamouri was accused of being a member of PFLP, designated as a terrorist organisation by the US, EU, Canada, and Israel.

Our complaint was upheld, and the following paragraph added:

In a statement, the Israel Defence Forces (IDF) said that Hamouri was detained on suspicion of activity in the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, which is designated as a terrorist organisation by Israel’s western allies.

Though we commend editors for the correction, the fact that McKernan referred to a convicted Palestinian terrorist as a “human rights” lawyer is another example of how the Guardian’s coverage of the region can be best described as pro-Palestinian advocacy, rather than real journalism.

https://camera-uk.org/2022/09/29/guardian-corrects-article-on-convicted-terrorist-salah-hamouri/
Click to expand...

"accused terrorist" - pretty sure that's any palestinian that breathes, according to the fascist Israelis.
 
McRocket said:
For the sake of the Palestinian's?
I wish it would come soon.
Click to expand...

Seriously, tell me how Israel is supposed to negotiate with a people that is hopelessly divided into rival factions? They haven't even had fresh elections since 2006 due primarily to Hamas intransigence. Gaza could become very wealthy with tourism, fishing and gas but the Hamas loonies prefer to keep it poor so that they can profit off of it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top