Israel is Panicking

[moon]

Your quoting from a "death to Israel" source. Here are the actual numbers and an explanation for your poll:

I'm quoting from the Israeli press.

The point of my contradiction of your claim- that the majority of Israelis are against the ethnic cleansing of Palestine- is that such ' information ' can only come from polls. Polls are used as a form of ' laundering ' of political opinion - a means to attempt to attach legitimacy to political ideals. Of course, for every poll there's an anti-poll with an opposite result- so let's not attempt to debate an issue that neither of us can prove. You've presented your opinion, I've presented mine, mine being that the pseudo-Jews of Israel would like nothing better than the extermination of Palestine's indigenous populations. I base that upon who they have elected and the ongoing crimes of that elected filth, some of whom have ICC arrest warrants issued for them. If you want to support the pseudo-Jews yourself then that's your right, unfortunately- but I'm not going to continue to repeat the obvious .

 

[IBDaMann]

Why does no one just go with the definition to which everyone has agreed and ratified?

 

[EdwinA]

The USA also suffered over 70,000 permanently disabled.

View attachment 52375

Most a result of Bush's fantasy that Arabs and Muslims can be civilized and become humans. His 'nation building' was a complete failure. He should have just handed over the Country to the Kurds and let them clean house. We should have just leveled the place and left it to the sheep herders and camel traders, then re-populated with real humans.

 

[T. A. Gardner]

Iran is trying to develop nuclear power. The United States recognizes this and applauds Iran's efforts. At the same time, the US is rightly concerned that Iran has enriched uranium beyond what it needs for a nuclear reactor. Trump told Iran directly that they cannot have a nuclear weapon, but they can have a peaceful nuclear program to bring energy to the people of Iran, and this requires inspections and verifications. It was that to which Iran was about to agree before Israel threw the wrench into the intake.

Commercial nuclear power only requires 3 to 5% enrichment for PWR and BWR technologies. There are no commercial uses for 60% enriched uranium. There are LOTS of military uses for it.

It is clear that regardless of what Iran is claiming, their nuclear program IS geared to manufacturing nuclear weapons.

It has immense value in delivering power throughout the country. Your comment is exactly the opposite of international concerns. The world believes that Iran is being "very efficient" in its uranium enrichment. Iran has no nuclear weapons, is trying to develop nuclear power (documented for decades) and has Israel shouting "Iran is enriching uranium! Iran is enriching uranium!" Because of the power and influence Israel wields, the European Union and the United States felt obligated to somehow "chastize" Iran to make Israel happy, despite recognizing that Iran's uranium is not weapons grade and that their nuclear program is totally legal and acceptable to everyone ... except Israel. So the IAEA needlessly "censured" Iran for its effective uranium enrichment process. The main point that should never be lost is that there is no issue here if inspectors are allowed to inspect and verify ... and Iran was about to agree to that ... when Israel deliberately sabotaged the agreement by attacking Iran and assassinating Iranian leaders.

The world recognizes the value of Iran's uranium; the world simply wants inspectors to observe and verify the peaceful implementation of Iran's nuclear program. Israel does not want peace.

Iran would not be enriching beyond 3 to 5% like they've done already. They have a large stockpile--known stockpile--of 60% enriched uranium already. Going from 60% to 90% isn't nearly as difficult as getting to 60%. The Europe is in denial. The US vacillates between coming down hard (Republicans) and placating (Democrats) the Iranians.

It is clear from what inspections have occurred to what's known in the intelligence community about the Iranian nuclear program is that they are moving towards building nuclear weapons. It's likely they're being cautious and want to ensure they have a stockpile of several in hand when they announce they're a nuclear power.

As for who wants peace, if Israel ceased to exist tomorrow, the Middle East would still have masses of terrorism, civil wars, and warfare going on regardless. If on the other hand, the various Arab factions ceased to exist the Middle East would be as peaceful as Europe.

 

[moon]

Commercial nuclear power only requires 3 to 5% enrichment for PWR and BWR technologies. There are no commercial uses for 60% enriched uranium. There are LOTS of military uses for it.

It is clear that regardless of what Iran is claiming, their nuclear program IS geared to manufacturing nuclear weapons.

You are a transparent bore. You've been seen. STFU.

 

[IBDaMann]

THE MAJORITY OF AMERICANS WERE AGAINST THE IRAQ INVASION.

Nice regurgitation of CNN's disinformation.

Just as the majority of the people of Israel are against Bibi's criminal campaign in Gaza.

I don't believe you. The Israeli population is, for the most part, overtly RACIST. The Likud party is the party that became the party of the 2nd Nakba to leverage this aspect of Israeli society. The Likud party brazenly spews anti-Arab rhetoric to resonate with a RACIST silent majority that just wants Arabs eradicated. Using the promise of ethnically cleansing the lands of the Arab infestation, the Likud party used this as a political strategy/platform around 2010 to thereafter reach, and remain in, control of 30+ seats in the Knesset. Netanyahu was riding low polling numbers in Israel until he started forcing Arabs to fish their dead children out of rubble. That imagery caused Benny's popularity to spike. At the same time Israelis began openly mocking Palestinians on social media and generally being total ashsoles.

The following are to be regarded solely as references / do your own research.

My belief is, and will continue to be until I see evidence to the contrary, that the majority of Israelis support the wanton slaughter of Arabs.

 

[IBDaMann]

Commercial nuclear power only requires 3 to 5% enrichment for PWR and BWR technologies.

I already addressed that. Iran has great centrifuges. Iran has BETTER uranium. Big deal. Either state your mistaken belief that Iran somehow cannot use its BETTER uranium to produce energy for the people ... or just jump to your concern that they might be trying to produce a nuclear bomb.

There are no commercial uses for 60% enriched uranium.

You are mistaken. Since you have decided to plant your flag on an error, we're done.

Let me know when you want to approach this topic on a factual basis.

 

[IBDaMann]

As for who wants peace, if Israel ceased to exist tomorrow, ...

... there would be immediate peace.

If on the other hand, the various Arab factions ceased to exist the Middle East ...

... Israel would accelerate its bombing of civilian populations, its assassinations of Arab leaders and its directed sniper fire at Arab children.

 

[T. A. Gardner]

I already addressed that. Iran has great centrifuges. Iran has BETTER uranium. Big deal. Either state your mistaken belief that Iran somehow cannot use its BETTER uranium to produce energy for the people ... or just jump to your concern that they might be trying to produce a nuclear bomb.

You are obviously a complete idiot on the subject of nuclear power. If you only need enrichment to 3 to 5% for commercial reactor use, then enriching beyond that point only means you have very expensive uranium that isn't cost effective. On the other hand, if your intention is to make bombs, enriching to 60% means you can easily enrich that material to the required 90 - 95% level for use in a bomb.

You are mistaken. Since you have decided to plant your flag on an error, we're done.

Show me a commercial reactor design, not some experimental one, that uses 60% enriched uranium. Go for it. I dare you.

Let me know when you want to approach this topic on a factual basis.

I just did. Now, try to respond with some facts and not personal fantasies based on your playing some video game nonsense.

 

[T. A. Gardner]

... there would be immediate peace.


... Israel would accelerate its bombing of civilian populations, its assassinations of Arab leaders and its directed sniper fire at Arab children.

 

[IBDaMann]

You are obviously a complete idiot on the subject of nuclear power.

Your assertion that nuclear reactors cannot be built to utilize better-enriched uranium is false, regardless of your lame attempts to bully me into believing that it is true. You position that since previous reactors were built to run on 5% uranium, all future reactors are limited to such as well ... has never been claimed, and you certainly have not supported it.

If you only need enrichment to 3 to 5% for commercial reactor use [with the oldest generation of reactors], then enriching beyond that point only means you have very expensive uranium that isn't cost effective.

Nope. If you were able to apply any sort of critical reasoning, you would have concluded that either Iran is planning on developing next generation reactors ... or they are trying to build a bomb. If Iran says that they are willing to allow inspectors to observe and verify their peaceful intentions, then how can you not allow them to meet your criteria?

On the other hand, if your intention is to make bombs, enriching to 60% means you can easily enrich that material to the required 90 - 95% level for use in a bomb.

Nope. You obviously know nothing about the process. Possessing the ability to achieve 60% does not mean:

* the ability to achieve 95% easily, or even at all
* the ability to create a functioning warhead
* the ability to work it into a delivery vehicle

Possessing the ability to achieve 60% does mean, however, that they have the potential to develop a nuclear energy program, but the world would probably want to insist on inspections, i.e. to prevent the development of a nuclear bomb.

Show me a commercial reactor design, not some experimental one, that uses 60% enriched uranium.

Show me that no experimental design (not existing designs) can more effectively generate energy from higher enrichments of uranium. Go for it. I dare you.

 

[serendipity]

You are obviously a complete idiot on the subject of nuclear power. If you only need enrichment to 3 to 5% for commercial reactor use, then enriching beyond that point only means you have very expensive uranium that isn't cost effective. On the other hand, if your intention is to make bombs, enriching to 60% means you can easily enrich that material to the required 90 - 95% level for use in a bomb.


Show me a commercial reactor design, not some experimental one, that uses 60% enriched uranium. Go for it. I dare you.

I just did. Now, try to respond with some facts and not personal fantasies based on your playing some video game nonsense.

He's just a sock, ignore the fucker!

 

[IBDaMann]

 

[IBDaMann]

He's just a sock, ignore the fucker!

You are nothing more than an emojee coward. You never add any value to a discussion. That you are ignored is completely appropriate.

 

[IBDaMann]

Most a result of Bush's fantasy that Arabs and Muslims can be civilized and become humans.

I think this is all anyone needs to know. Your resume has you as a card-carrying member of Team Israel who recognizes that Arabs are a terrorist organization whose children need to be exterminated before they can mature into full militants.

You are an excellent spokesperson for your side.

 

[EdwinA]

I think this is all anyone needs to know. Your resume has you as a card-carrying member of Team Israel who recognizes that Arabs are a terrorist organization whose children need to be exterminated before they can mature into full militants.

You are an excellent spokesperson for your side.

lol nobody cares about your idiot opinions, terrorist fan boi. You are an excellent spokesman for halfwits and xian haters. Your cellmates must be happy.