Isolation?

Lowaicue

英語在香港
To what extent does America need the rest of the world?
To what extent does the rest of the world need America.

This IS a straight question. You may clarify on your own terms if you wish. You may answer in terms of alliances, enemies or economies.

Need may be defined as being useful to have around all the way to totally dependent.

Try to restrain your particular talent for wit and comedy. You are, most probably, alone in its appreciation.
 
To what extent does America need the rest of the world?
To what extent does the rest of the world need America.

This IS a straight question. You may clarify on your own terms if you wish. You may answer in terms of alliances, enemies or economies.

Need may be defined as being useful to have around all the way to totally dependent.

Try to restrain your particular talent for wit and comedy. You are, most probably, alone in its appreciation.

We need other countries more now than ever in the past. We are not a self determined nation, anymore. We do not manufacture most of our goods and we are energy defendant.

The globall economy is what is screwing us all.
 
We need other countries more now than ever in the past. We are not a self determined nation, anymore. We do not manufacture most of our goods and we are energy defendant.

The globall economy is what is screwing us all.


Here Rana, I'll help you out.....cry baby...

:help::whiteflag::help::whiteflag::help::whiteflag::help::whiteflag::help::whiteflag::help::whiteflag::help:


How many in Hong Kong and the world for that matter learn and speak English, some required to ......and how many Americans see any benefit to learning or speaking Chinese
and anything other than Spanish or French or German and thats just for fun.......
That should answer your question.....
 
how many Americans see any benefit to learning or speaking Chinese
...That should answer your question.....


Blabo thinks nobody wants to learn Chinese?

"figures from local language centres across the continent suggest that the number of people in Europe enlisted in taking the official Chinese Proficiency Test - or HSK - over the last two years has grown by close to a factor five."

http://euobserver.com/china/117086


"Chinese is becoming one of the most popular foreign language options for American students."


http://www.educationnews.org/k-12-schools/rising-number-of-american-students-are-learning-chinese/


Poor Blabo.
 
Here Rana, I'll help you out.....cry baby...

:help::whiteflag::help::whiteflag::help::whiteflag::help::whiteflag::help::whiteflag::help::whiteflag::help:


How many in Hong Kong and the world for that matter learn and speak English, some required to ......and how many Americans see any benefit to learning or speaking Chinese
and anything other than Spanish or French or German and thats just for fun.......
That should answer your question.....

I think it shows you haven't understood the question. You are so far up your own partisan arse you can't even begin to understand people who actually seek opinions.
Would America benefit more from isolationism or from foreign interference? Where is the middle way?
To what extent does the rest of the world depend upon America? Try to be sensible.
Why language should form the mainstay of your opinion I do not know. Perhaps you would like to justify that?
 
Prior to WWI, America went through a period of isolationism, and enjoyed tremendous prosperity trading within our own hemisphere, and avoiding conflict. When repressive totalitarianism threatened our allies in Europe, we got involved, and sent thousands of our boys to die, defending European homelands. Following WWI, we again embarked on a period of isolationism, preferring to leave world affairs to others, and keep our nose out of their business. Again, we prospered until the Great Depression, but we still felt it best we remain isolationist with regard to foreign affairs. Even when Hitler began to threaten Europe with totalitarianism again, we remained resolved to stay out of it until Pearl Harbor was bombed by Japan. At that point, we realized we could no longer turn a blind eye to the problems of the world, and we got involved again, sending thousands to die again for a free Europe.

Following WWII, we helped to establish the United Nations, as a means to help monitor problems around the world in a diplomatic and democratic manner. This once again enabled us to embark on a period of isolationism, until Communism threatened Southeast Asia. Once again, we sent thousands of our boys to die for the freedom of others in Korea and then in Vietnam. After years of war, we decided it wasn't worth the effort and we abandoned the fight. Since then we have tried to remain isolationist and let the UN sort the affairs, and that hasn't worked. Radical Islam rose up in the late 70s, and on 9/11/01, we were once again attacked.

As much as the US has attempted to be isolationists, and stay out of other people's business, we've ultimately never been able to. The result is always the same, totalitarian regimes rise to power and begin trampling freedom, greasing the treads of their war machines with the dead bodies of innocent people, committing atrocious acts of genocide and terrorism on people who's only crime was to exist. Now we have enemies with nuclear weapons, and a nuclear armageddon is possible. At stake, are potentially MILLIONS of lives instead of thousands. Some of us are ignorant of history and are like infants trying to comprehend world affairs. To these people, it seems rational and plausible that we could be isolationists, and things would be great and wonderful. We've OFTEN thought this in the past, and it has never worked out. When we look at the anatomy of a totalitarian regime, we find an interesting common thread, Europe always seems to play it off as not a big deal, nothing to worry about, and in some cases, even endorses and embraces as "the way of the future" before dead bodies start piling up in mass graves and such.

So you ask, should we be isolationists again? ...If only we could! I would give anything to be able to do this, but my knowledge and understanding of the world and history, tells me this is not a possible reality for us long term, and the more we attempt it, the greater the number of our soldiers lives that will ultimately have to be sacrificed to bring order again. Therefore, I have a "FUCK YOU" philosophy when it comes to our involvement in world affairs. You don't "like" what we do, fine... stop us! We're gonna do it, because we don't have any other real choice in the matter. Isolationism doesn't work for very long. It's better that we have our nose stuck in everyone's business and ready to act whenever needed, to put down tyrants and dictators who seek to aggressively trample freedom. If you want some other arrangement, convince the tyrants and totalitarians of the world to adopt democracy and freedom for the people, then we won't have this problem and it won't matter that we are involved in things.
 
Economic globalism will help us prosper, because we live in one giant global economy.

Political isolationism is best, because we don't need to be fighting other people's wars, solving their political problems, or trying to impress the world with our heroics and sense of purpose and indispensability. There are few political allies worth having, but plenty of trading partners worth doing business with.
 
we should use the world for our benefit, so long as they serve us. we are the best, and the rest of the world will do what we say. who will stop us? euros? I dont think so. lol.

aCUaR.jpg
 
I think it shows you haven't understood the question. You are so far up your own partisan arse you can't even begin to understand people who actually seek opinions.
Would America benefit more from isolationism or from foreign interference? Where is the middle way?
To what extent does the rest of the world depend upon America? Try to be sensible.
Why language should form the mainstay of your opinion I do not know. Perhaps you would like to justify that?


We don't practice isolationism nor do you interfere with friendly and stable nations.....

The fact that other nations steal and copy our medicines, our designs in thousands of industries, inventions, and any number of others things must tell you
who in fact needs who to advance in this world.....you may call that arrogant, but fact is fact....

The US is responsible for feeding, educating, and healing millions all over the world, along with other western countries.....without any compensation.....
It is undeniable that the west, and in particular, the US is the reason so many other nations are entering the world wide economy and
making progress for the welfare of their own citizens.....
 
We don't practice isolationism nor do you interfere with friendly and stable nations.....

The fact that other nations steal and copy our medicines, our designs in thousands of industries, inventions, and any number of others things must tell you
who in fact needs who to advance in this world.....you may call that arrogant, but fact is fact....

The US is responsible for feeding, educating, and healing millions all over the world, along with other western countries.....without any compensation.....
It is undeniable that the west, and in particular, the US is the reason so many other nations are entering the world wide economy and
making progress for the welfare of their own citizens.....

My god!You are a sucker for right wing propaganda. You must be one of the very few people left who still believe that.
 
Back
Top