Is the media's love affair with obama over?

Cancel 2018. 3

<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
Obama's 'Beast' of a limo stands out at green NATO summit

LISBON (AFP) – The Portuguese hosts of Friday's NATO summit hoped to use the event to promote clean-energy and electric cars, but all eyes were on US President Barack Obama's diesel-guzzling "Beast" instead.

As is usual when he travels, Obama's eight-tonne armoured behemoth of a limousine was flown out to Lisbon before the US leader's arrival, and it ferried him from the airport tarmac to his first meetings of the weekend.

Doubtless he didn't intend the Beast's roar to drown out his hosts' green message, but a US presidential motorcade and its attendant escort of Secret Service SUVs do attract attention, even at the most elite gatherings.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20101119/pl_afp/natosummitobamatransportenvironmentoffbeat

imo, there are many legitimate criticisms of the president, this isn't one

his security is non negotiable
 
And leave him unprotected with all the racists assholes in this world?

Fuck you very much.

where are my lies desh? when others accuse you of such, you demand links...link up

and tff how its always racism with the president, its clear you're the racist
 
And leave him unprotected with all the racists assholes in this world?

Fuck you very much.

Did you even bother to read the last two sentences, you fucking whiney little bitch.
*rhetorical question; because it's fucking obvious you didn't*
 
And leave him unprotected with all the racists assholes in this world?

Fuck you very much.

Evince,

Yurt defended Obama's use of the armored vehicle, which you'd know had you actually read his post. I, too, believe the President's safety is more important than vain, feel-good environmentalism.
 
Yurt Im sorry for not fully reading your post.

You are and I am glad to see you defending what in my haste I thought you were complaining about.
 
lmao...there isn't one single lie there

and the last link was the same as the first...

it appears you're the one lying as you're trying to pass off 3 seperate link, when in truth 2 of them are the same...

you have no proven conclusively that you're a liar...

you claimed they were well documented, yet you can't even explain what the lie is, typical desh, make false claims and try to pass them off as truth
 
This is why it's important to set terms with Yurt first.

You go & get the exact link he wants, and he'll deny, distract & shift the goalposts....
 
This is why it's important to set terms with Yurt first.

You go & get the exact link he wants, and he'll deny, distract & shift the goalposts....

what a liar...even if i agreed to your stupid terms that you didn't set until HOURS later because you knew you lied after you couldn't find anything to support your claim...and you knew i wouldn't agree to stupid terms...if desh finds a lie and proves, i will admit, your terms woudl not stop me from telling desh here that she lied, there is not a single lie

and you know it, else you would be jumping all over it, you and her are now proven liars...its really sad how low you become, you're now on par with desh

congrats
 
what is truly comical about this onceler, is that you're actually trying to claim your terms are not demands....that is so dishonest i can't believe you actually think anyone, except maineman, will believe you

you will not prove your point, unless i do X

that is a demand you lying prick
 
what a liar...even if i agreed to your stupid terms that you didn't set until HOURS later because you knew you lied after you couldn't find anything to support your claim...and you knew i wouldn't agree to stupid terms...if desh finds a lie and proves, i will admit, your terms woudl not stop me from telling desh here that she lied, there is not a single lie

and you know it, else you would be jumping all over it, you and her are now proven liars...its really sad how low you become, you're now on par with desh

congrats

No need to get all testy. Just explaining your m.o. to anyone else reading the thread.

I think it's pretty clear why I was looking to set some terms now....

:)
 
what is truly comical about this onceler, is that you're actually trying to claim your terms are not demands....that is so dishonest i can't believe you actually think anyone, except maineman, will believe you

you will not prove your point, unless i do X

that is a demand you lying prick

your terms are nothing but a weak demand to avoid proving your point

at first you simple said you woudl bump it, i said bump it.....roughly 7 or 8 hours go by and after you can't find anything, you decide to DEMAND i agree to your terms in order for you to prove your assertion, then you actually claim you are not making a demand, its me demanding you prove your claim when you are the one who OFFERED to prove your claim, i merely accepted

if you are going to continue this dishonest elementary school bullshit, i really don't see any reason to continue discourse with you
 
your terms are nothing but a weak demand to avoid proving your point

at first you simple said you woudl bump it, i said bump it.....roughly 7 or 8 hours go by and after you can't find anything, you decide to DEMAND i agree to your terms in order for you to prove your assertion, then you actually claim you are not making a demand, its me demanding you prove your claim when you are the one who OFFERED to prove your claim, i merely accepted

if you are going to continue this dishonest elementary school bullshit, i really don't see any reason to continue discourse with you

Oh...you're running away? Why am I not surprised...
 
since you agree with desh that she proved 3 lies, despite the fact that two of the links were identical....why don't you explain just one of the lies

you have the time to whine and moan about your DEMAND i agree to terms...why don't you take that energy and actually explain just one of the purported lies desh posted

:)
 
Back
Top