Is the media liberal, or just incompetent?

Is the media liberal, or just incompetent?

  • The media is predominantly liberal

    Votes: 6 100.0%
  • The media is incompetent

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • The media is fair

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • The media is competent & non-biased

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
  • Poll closed .

Big Money

New member

The public overwhelmingly finds the news media to be biased, dishonest, and focused on trivial issues.

A plurality also view the news media as exhibiting a liberal bias.

The public overwhelmingly finds the news media to be biased, dishonest, and focused on trivial issues.

A plurality also view the news media as exhibiting a liberal bias.

I didn't see the correct answer so I couldn't vote; they are Liberal AND incompetent.
why is corporate media perceived as LIBERAL by the right?

because they don't like facts.

Its why they like Fox the best.

Fox paid the Big Bucks in court for the right to LIE to their viewers
Guess what5 would be reported ON if your corporate media were REALLY left leaning like you claim?

THe completely court documented decades long Cheating of the republican party to keep legal American voters from voting.
So CBS News made a "corporate decision" to stand by a news story based on a 1970 Microsoft Word document?


Republican Party of Ohio v. Secretary Brunner

October 13, 2008|

Restricting the Vote,

Voting Rights & Elections

In Brief – On October 17, 2008, the United States Supreme Court issued a stay in this case. Click here to download the ruling.

In Republican Party of Ohio v. Brunner, the Ohio Republican Party sued Ohio's Secretary of State, alleging that various policies adopted by the Secretary, Ohio's chief election officer, violated federal and state law. Among the claims was that Ohio was not in compliance with provisions of the Help America Vote Act of 2002 ("HAVA") which require states to attempt to "match" information provided by citizens who apply to register to vote with the motor vehicle and Social Security databases.

Plaintiffs filed their complaint on September 26, 2008 and, on October 5th, filed a motion for a temporary restraining order ("TRO") as to their HAVA compliance claim. After briefing and a hearing, the district court granted the motion for TRO on October 9th, and the Secretary immediately filed an emergency motion for a stay of the TRO order in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.

The Brennan Center filed an amicus brief in the Sixth Circuit, supporting the request for a stay. The brief explained that plaintiffs were wrong to argue that HAVA required registration applicants to be successfully matched before they could be deemed eligible to vote. On October 9th, the Sixth Circuit granted the motion for a stay. Less than a week later, however, the full Sixth Circuit, sitting en banc, vacated the stay and restored the district court's TRO.

The Secretary of State responded to the en banc opinion by issuing a statement stating that it is "imperative that voters not be disenfranchised because of federal government red tape, misstated technical information or glitches in databases beyond the control of voters . . . ", and promptly sought review from the U.S. Supreme Court.

On October 17, 2008, the Supreme Court vacated the TRO, protecting hundreds of thousands of Ohio citizens from disenfranchisement-by-typo
just one of many many cases in which the COURTS had to STOP the republican party from cheating voters
the republican party does NOT believe in democracy.

its why they even LIE about the definition of the word
It just amazes me that every republican on the internets likes to pretend that its crazy to look at decades of court cases in the court records and to see what the courts have said.

It proves to me that the people in this country on the right are completely mentally bankrupt.

cases and cases EVERY election year show exactly what the truth is.

That the republican party cheats right from the top in elections and gets CAUGHT and punished and the COURTS of our country have this information at the ready and YET the right pretends its crazy to talk about these records.

what is wrong with the right leaning brain in this country that they are that stupid ?

Court Cases

Al Falah Center v. Township of Bridgewater

The Al Falah Center brought suit against the Township of Bridgewater, N.J. to compel the township to allow Al Falah to move forward with plans to renovate an existing building for use as a mosque and Islamic community center.

October 1, 2013|

Liberty & National Security.

NLRB v. Noel Canning (Amicus Brief)

In an amicus brief, the Brennan Center argues that, particularly in Washington's highly partisan and obstructionist environment, the president’s power to fill vacancies during congressional recesses is essential to the functioning of the government.

September 23, 2013|


Texas NAACP v. Steen

The Brennan Center and co-counsel filed suit in federal court challenging Texas's strict photo voter ID law on behalf of the Texas State Conference of the NAACP and the Mexican American Legislative Caucus of the Texas House of Representatives (MALC).

September 17, 2013|

Voting Rights & Elections,

Restricting the Vote.

Michigan v. Bailey (Amicus Brief)

The Brennan Center filed an amicus brief in Michigan v. Bailey arguing that incarcerating an individual for their inability to pay criminal justice debt contributes to mass incarceration and may be unconstitutional under Michigan law.

August 26, 2013|

Reducing Mass Incarceration.

Dobson v. Arizona (Amicus Brief)

Matt Menendez

The Brennan Center submitted an amicus curiae brief explaining the virtues of merit selection of judges and arguing that Dobson v. Arizona presents an issue of serious importance in changing the state's separation of powers.

August 7, 2013|

Fair Courts.




go look at the history
go count the ones in these paged and pageds of history that involve the republicans trying to cheat voters.

there is a reason the republican party has been under a court order for DECADES

Judge Denies Republicans' Effort To End Voter Intimidation Consent Decree

December 9, 2009 by Special To Personal Liberty

Judge denies Republicans' effort to end voter intimidation consent decreeLast week, a federal judge in New Jersey rejected an attempt by the Republican National Committee (RNC) to dissolve a 27-year-old court order that is intended to prevent the intimidation of minority voters.

Stemming from a lawsuit brought forth by the Democratic National Committee in 1982, a consent decree was agreed upon which forced the RNC to gain court approval to use certain election tactics, including the creation of voter challenge lists, photographing voters at the polls and posting off-duty police at voting locations in minority neighborhoods, according to The New York Times.

Republicans argued that the consent decree was hampering efforts to combat voter fraud, which had escalated over the previous few years, according to RNC lawyers.
yes not every case listed on that list is about just voting rights.

But the voting rightss cases are in that list
Now tell me why the republican party IS still under a consent Decree held by the courts to protect voters?

WHY did the Judge DENY them in their attempt to vacate the decision?
Here I thought foxnews was right wing and rush limbaugh was the king of the right wing rectums along with the weeping whackjob Glen Beck and the looney Savage. In all fairness I suppose if your a right winger you only see what you want to see to make yourself feel right.