Is Raising Tobacco Tax Really A 'Tax Increase' on Poor?

cawacko

Well-known member
We know Obama's no new tax campaign pledge on those making under a certain amount or about 95% of the population I believe he said. I think Chap has the quote as his sig. It looks like Obama signed a bill that raises tobacco taxes. Since supposedly the poor disporportionately smoke does this count as a tax increase on them? Here's how the AP reports it.


PROMISES, PROMISES: Obama tax pledge up in smoke

Apr 1 11:55 AM US/Eastern
By CALVIN WOODWARD
Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON (AP) - One of President Barack Obama's campaign pledges on taxes went up in puffs of smoke Wednesday.
The largest increase in tobacco taxes took effect despite Obama's promise not to raise taxes of any kind on families earning under $250,000 or individuals under $200,000.

This is one tax that disproportionately affects the poor, who are more likely to smoke than the rich.

To be sure, Obama's tax promises in last year's campaign were most often made in the context of income taxes. Not always.


"I can make a firm pledge," he said in Dover, N.H., on Sept. 12. "Under my plan, no family making less than $250,000 a year will see any form of tax increase. Not your income tax, not your payroll tax, not your capital gains taxes, not any of your taxes."

He repeatedly vowed "you will not see any of your taxes increase one single dime."

Now in office, Obama, who stopped smoking but has admitted he slips now and then, signed a law raising the tobacco tax nearly 62 cents on a pack of cigarettes, to $1.01. Other tobacco products saw similarly steep increases.

The extra money will be used to finance a major expansion of health insurance for children. That represents a step toward achieving another promise, to make sure all kids are covered.

Obama said in the campaign that Americans could have both—a broad boost in affordable health insurance for the nation without raising taxes on anyone but the rich.

His detailed campaign plan stated that his proposed improvement in health insurance and health technology "is more than covered" by raising taxes on the wealthy alone. It was not based on raising the tobacco tax.

The White House contends Obama's campaign pledge left room for measures such as the one financing children's health insurance.

"The president's position throughout the campaign was that he would not raise income or payroll taxes on families making less than $250,000, and that's a promise he has kept," said White House spokesman Reid H. Cherlin. "In this case, he supported a public health measure that will extend health coverage to 4 million children who are currently uninsured."

In some instances during the campaign, Obama was plainly talking about income, payroll and investment taxes, even if he did not say so.

Other times, his point appeared to be that heavier taxation of any sort on average Americans is the wrong prescription in tough times.

"Listen now," he said in his widely watched nomination acceptance speech, "I will cut taxes—cut taxes—for 95 percent of all working families, because, in an economy like this, the last thing we should do is raise taxes on the middle class."

An unequivocal "any tax" pledge also was heard in the vice presidential debate, another prominent forum.

"No one making less than $250,000 under Barack Obama's plan will see one single penny of their tax raised," Joe Biden said, "whether it's their capital gains tax, their income tax, investment tax, any tax."

The Democratic campaign used such statements to counter Republican assertions that Obama would raise taxes in a multitude of direct and indirect ways, recalled Kathleen Hall Jamieson, director of the Annenberg Public Policy Center at the University of Pennsylvania.

"I think a reasonable person would have concluded that Senator Obama had made a 'no new taxes' pledge to every couple or family making less than $250,000," she said.

Jamieson noted GOP ads that claimed Obama would raise taxes on electricity and home heating oil. "They rebutted both with the $250,000 claim," she said of the Obama campaign, "so they did extend the rebuttal beyond income and payroll."

Government and private research has found that smoking rates are higher among people of low income.

A Gallup survey of 75,000 people last year fleshed out that conclusion. It found that 34 percent of respondents earning $6,000 to $12,000 were smokers, and the smoking rate consistently declined among people of higher income. Only 13 percent of people earning $90,000 or more were smokers.

Federal or state governments often turn for extra tax dollars to the one in five Americans who smoke, and many states already hit tobacco users this year. So did the tobacco companies, which raised the price on many brands by more than 70 cents a pack.

The latest increase in the federal tax is by far the largest since its introduction in 1951, when it was 8 cents a pack. It's gone up six times since, each time by no more than a dime, until now.

Apart from the tax haul, public health advocates argue that squeezing smokers will help some to quit and persuade young people not to start.

But it was a debate the country didn't have in a presidential campaign that swore off higher taxation.

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D979POSG0&show_article=1
 
I can't see where it would be called anything else but a tax on the poor..

but what does it matter eh, those nasty ole smokers should pay through the nose..but when they don't generate enough money from smokers, they will come after something that others do, so not to worry.
 
He's raising the shit out of taxes on everybody, only the the dumbest leftist tool doesn't see that. Shit I see it and not many are left of me.
 
Well aren't we all lucky that HE is raising taxes on everybody..I guess just so others don't feel left out..

join a tea party protest..
 
The Tobacco tax will hurt sales. American Spirit tobacco went from 17 bucks a tin for the large tin to 33 dollars today. Sales of that tobacco will go down thus decreasing revenues raised from that brand. Other brands will similarly see a loss, prices going up without a demand increase kill demand.
 
at least the smugglers will still have a job and getting richer, while us poor peons take it in the shorts.....but as long as HE is raising taxes on everybody, we shouldn't all be so upset..

join a tea party protest..
 
tax cuts, that's rich..

how the hell do you supposedly cut taxes, then impose the largest tax increase on a certain segment of the population?
must be MAGIC
 
It certainly is a tax on the poor.

I can't see where it would be called anything else but a tax on the poor..

but what does it matter eh, those nasty ole smokers should pay through the nose..but when they don't generate enough money from smokers, they will come after something that others do, so not to worry.
 
I can't see where it would be called anything else but a tax on the poor..

but what does it matter eh, those nasty ole smokers should pay through the nose..but when they don't generate enough money from smokers, they will come after something that others do, so not to worry.
Big Macs. They'll tax Big Macs... because there is nothing like linking something important to something you don't "want" people to do...
 
Back
Top