Of course you want a simple yes or no; because then, you don't have to look at how intellectually dishonest the question is.
But I'll play: no.
is obama a systemic failure?
- Thread starter Cancel 2018. 3
- Start date
Of course you want a simple yes or no; because then, you don't have to look at how intellectually dishonest the question is.
But I'll play: no.
DamnYankee
Loyal to the end
Only a faggot would think like that.
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
Of course you want a simple yes or no; because then, you don't have to look at how intellectually dishonest the question is.
But I'll play: no.
no? so obama is not part of the system? do you know what systemic means? its not dishonest at all.....but i'm not surprised you had to inject an insult
"No," in that he didn't admit he failed, though Obama has admitted mistakes on other issues.
That's why it's important to examine the dishonest nature in the way you frame the question. You really don't see that? It's something you do quite a bit, and it's kind of pathetic.
Yet another "gotcha" technique, but at a pretty low intellectual level...
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
did obama say there was a systemic failure?
Yep.
Don't bother with the next question. I can see where your 3rd grade mind is going w/ this. It fails.
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
what does systemic mean?
It means Obama is guilty of murder, theft & a variety of other assorted crimes & transgressions...
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
do you really not know what systemic means? are you actually claiming obama is not part of the system he said failed? that obama is not in charge of that system? really.....?
Stop with the 3rd grade faux logic; it's really embarassing.
Last edited:
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
thanks for proving once again you are incapable of having a rational discussion with me. when you start to see you're wrong, you lash out with insults and effectively run away from the discussion. it used to be humorous, but now, after doing it so many times, its just plain sad.
It's not an insult. It's a fact: the following is 3rd grade logic - maybe 2nd grade:
Obama blames system.
Obama leads system.
Therefore, he blames himself - unknowingly!
THAT is sad - like, as sad as it gets. And you really think this is a solid point you're making? You think it's "good debate"?
Yikes...
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
It's not an insult. It's a fact: the following is 3rd grade logic - maybe 2nd grade:
Obama blames system.
Obama leads system.
Therefore, he blames himself - unknowingly!
THAT is sad - like, as sad as it gets. And you really think this is a solid point you're making? You think it's "good debate"?
Yikes...
i'm sad for you onceler...
you admitted obama did not take the blame, yet obama said it was a systemic failure, he arguably leads the system that failed, at a minimum he is a part of the system he claims failed....thus, obama failed but he couldn't be honest and admit it....
if you weren't such an obama apologist, you could just simply admit obama said he failed when he claimed it was a systemic failure....
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
as i said, when you realize you're wrong, you stop discussion and resort to insults....you seem to believe that if you just say...you're stupid... that it makes you right or smart, it doesn't
its quite pathetic, but par for the course with you....i guess i shouldn't be surprised you ran away and can't actually explain how obama did not blame himself when he said it was a systemic failure....you can't answer whether he is apart of the system, runs the system....all you can do is wail like a 5 year old and say....you're just a stupid head, nananananaanaaa
Translation: I know I start stupid threads over & over again, and it's indefensible.
(yawn)
It's too bad you can't leave the people alone you claim bore you. Is this like an OCD thing with you? Did it like kinda start with a little tuft of hair and the next thing you knew you were bald? I mean like almost overnight or somethin'?
