evince
Truthmatters
He's a fucking liar. He talked about President Obama's character for 8 years. Remember how they had a fit about Reverend Wright?
annnatta fooled some people here
never fooled me
He's a fucking liar. He talked about President Obama's character for 8 years. Remember how they had a fit about Reverend Wright?
The bolded is a cop-out from the question of the OP, anatta.
No one is suggesting a priest. But how low are you willing to go for "the agenda"? Does character not matter at ALL to you, as long as the ends are achieved?
he can tweet what he wants. I'm not worried about re-tweets. we got enough to worry about.I don't personally look to DC for anything. But when the President gets ahead by lying, that has an effect. We're in what is now called a "post-truth era," and that has effects well beyond politics. When he tweets from extremist websites to stoke hatred and division, it has an effect.
He's not just a pen to implement policy. This is one where I actually know you're wrong; you have a very narrow view of what's entailed in being a world leader. Not that we've had paragons of morality, but every President's flaws in that area have had reach.
I'm not asking this in a snarky way. I'm genuinely curious what posters on both sides might think on this.
I don't know how Trump is going to be judged on the economy. Obviously, it depends on where it's at when he leaves - but it's doing great right now, and there is as much chance that it will be gangbusters throughout his admin as there is that it will topple. And this is a good thing; this one fact is something we should all celebrate.
And then there is the fact that he tweeted basically fake videos from one of the most extremist groups in GB today (a guy who lost his wife to the group said they're the equivalent of the KKK). He reportedly believes in a lot of the nutty conspiracy theories out there, and is even supposedly revisiting that Obama might have been born in Kenya. If reports are to be believed (and would this really be surprising?), he's starting to deny that it's him on the Access Hollywood tape. In short, he is more mentally unstable than basically anyone who has occupied that office. The severity of his issues are still to be determined, but most agree that there ARE issues, and they're fairly significant.
Beyond that, we can already see what kind of effect his pathological/amoral behavior is having on the country at large. As one writer put it, it's accurate to say we're in the "post-truth" era. A world of alternative facts and constructed realities is not just being accepted, but encouraged as some sort of shortcut to successful ends. And obviously, the country is not as friendly a place to be right now for many minorities, ethnicities, genders and religions.
So, is it worth it? Does character NOT matter, as long as the ends are achieved? Is that a standard we'd be comfortable with going forward?
At least you're straight-up about it.
I couldn't possibly disagree more, though. The President sets the tone for the country. We'll see the effects of Trump's character for years to come.
I don't personally look to DC for anything. But when the President gets ahead by lying, that has an effect. We're in what is now called a "post-truth era," and that has effects well beyond politics. When he tweets from extremist websites to stoke hatred and division, it has an effect.
He's not just a pen to implement policy. This is one where I actually know you're wrong; you have a very narrow view of what's entailed in being a world leader. Not that we've had paragons of morality, but every President's flaws in that area have had reach.
The bolded is a cop-out from the question of the OP, anatta.
No one is suggesting a priest. But how low are you willing to go for "the agenda"? Does character not matter at ALL to you, as long as the ends are achieved?
If you think that Trump is the first President to get ahead by lying, then you should just stop talking about politics. This 'post-truth' nonsense is just a talking point created to pretend this is something new.
If you think that Trump is the first President to get ahead by lying, then you should just stop talking about politics. This 'post-truth' nonsense is just a talking point created to pretend this is something new.
I don't personally look to DC for anything. But when the President gets ahead by lying, that has an effect. We're in what is now called a "post-truth era," and that has effects well beyond politics. When he tweets from extremist websites to stoke hatred and division, it has an effect.
He's not just a pen to implement policy. This is one where I actually know you're wrong; you have a very narrow view of what's entailed in being a world leader. Not that we've had paragons of morality, but every President's flaws in that area have had reach.
Evidently, character matters little to you, since you only seem interested in the alleged moral failings of Republicans, while completely ignoring the telephone pole in your own eye. What a fucking joke.
he can tweet what he wants. I'm not worried about re-tweets. we got enough to worry about.
Prioritize. If Trump's language is horrid -so what? His language doesn't pay my bills or effect my security
HIS POLICIES DO.
There are plenty of place to look for morality/spirituality - DC is the last place i consider for such
fucking sociopath
you lie straight into the face of facts
I know you're in hyper-defense mode right now, but there is no comparison between Trump & past politicians.
Yes, all politicians have lied. No, not all politicians have lied like Trump. No one at that level has.
as long as POTUS is not a criminal..no character really doesn't count.
It's just like realpolitik. morals are not the business of government.
Focus on the basics. getting our economic house in order, and a sound foreign policy.
If you get "good character" too-consider it a bonus, but not a necessity
is the CBO report vaild
Given that the Democrats supported Clinton, both parties proved they will go as low as it takes. Two highly corrupt and unethical pieces of shit... that is what the two parties put forth.