Not that I know of.
Is it our job to fight Iran?
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
Tobytone
Verified User
ftfy
serendipity
Verified User
You've totally revealed yourself for the fucked up arsehole I've always suspected up to now, thanks.
Right/Not Right is what matters in this particular universe.
I would not necessarily be opposed to that. Would you be opposed to bombing Iran?
Should the United States do something about it if a woman tries to leave a protest in a minivan and the regime shoots her dead?
AI Overview
Yes, the CIA has a deep, secret intelligence partnership with Ukraine's intelligence services (HUR), providing crucial training, funding, and intelligence support, especially for operations against Russia, including targeting information and building capabilities since 2014, which significantly ramped up after the 2022 invasion to help Ukraine defend itself and gather insights on Moscow
. This collaboration involves training Ukrainian forces, establishing bases, sharing intelligence for strikes, and even conducting joint global operations, making them vital allies.
The vast majority of MAGA morons on this board will follow orders to cheer
for Trump if he starts a war with Iran.
Tobytone
Verified User
As always, America needs to ask the question. If not us, then who? Of course, we could all be morons like Jarod and say, it's not my problem so too bad for them. He's the guy you don't want on a subway with you if you're 90 lbs. women getting attacked by a rapist murderer. 'Hey, I'm not the one getting fucked here, so why should I help?' asks Jarod.
I would rather we didn't bomb them unless they use their military against the citizenry which they are now starting to do.
The regime is a dictatorship that was not elected by the people. You seem to be making some sort of bizarre comparison to the woman that tried to run her car into a LEO who was enforcing laws that were passed by our representative government. Do you think anarchists should just ignore our laws and try to injure or kill Federal LEOs?
Well said.
Getting rid of a regime that is hostile to the US and is busy building nukes and an intercontinental delivery system is a good thing for the USA.
AI is not a valid source, sometimes however, AI provides links to its conclusions .
That being said, the things you listed, I have no objection to.
They have not been building nuclear weapons since 2003.....not doing it was their big mistake....North Korea is the example of how to successfully deal with the abusive Imperial Empire.
So you have no objections to boots on the ground. Interesting. 
How the CIA and Ukrainian intelligence secretly forged a deep partnership
Lll
I oppose direct bombing, and I oppose combat troops on the ground.
Depends on what kind of boots you are talking about. The boots are not the issue.So you have no objections to boots on the ground. Interesting.
How the CIA and Ukrainian intelligence secretly forged a deep partnership
I oppose direct bombing, and I oppose combat troops on the ground.
Why is it our business to bomb them if they use their military against their people?
To prevent their military from shooting ICBMs at US in the future. And to stop the death to America chants
Last edited:
Ridiculous, so you are back to using the WMD argument? That did not take long.
So American boots on the ground is OK with you but not bombing their military that wants to and has killed American isn't. Interesting
Do you deny they were building ICBM technology.