Is Islamic rhetoric to blame?

Seahawk said:
Those were his words and you can't give an opinion on unambiguous words? But you can certainly know he didn't say it, right?
Click to expand...

I simply don't accept spurious anti-Muslim rhetoric from any source- you included.


Even as the details were emerging on Sunday, Michael Oren, the former Israeli ambassador to the US and now a member of Israel’s parliament, the Knesset, was advising presumptive Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump on how to exploit the tragedy for political gain.

“If I was Donald Trump, I would have come out the minute that the FBI started to indicate this morning that we are talking about a guy who was operating from Islamic motivations,” Oren told Israeli television. “Just his name alone … a Muslim name, the son of Afghan immigrants who apparently maintained connections of some sort to extremist Islamic organizations, that in itself will greatly influence the presidential race.”

Trump needed no such advice and quickly seized on the killings to renew his calls for a blanket ban on Muslims entering the United States.

http://tinyurl.com/ja8sec8
Click to expand...


As for the ranks of Trumpette propaganda sponges............
 
moon2012 said:
The guy himself said- " When asked about his alleged comments in March in Orlando regarding gays, Sekaleshfar chalked it up to “academic discussion” and that he was describing a “theoretical angle as to what Islam says.”

How come you know what the guy said better than the guy who said it ? Because you watch Fox news ?
Click to expand...

I am sure that you know very well about Taqiyya, in fact you employ it on a regular basis. The only question is do you do this for free or are you being paid?
 
Milagro said:
Yes and you are being monitored as well sonny, expect a visit soon.
Click to expand...

You clearly live in a country which probits free speech. You clearly enjoy the concept- hence your ' thread-banning ' of your opponents and intellectual superiors . You are a half-formed fascist already. See you, Jiminy.
 
moon2012 said:
You clearly live in a country which probits free speech. You clearly enjoy the concept- hence your ' thread-banning ' of your opponents and intellectual superiors . You are a half-formed fascist already. See you, Jiminy.
Click to expand...

I threadban trolls like LeonTwat and Trollop, I engage you for amusement and to expose your sinister motivation. Stitch that Jimmy!!
 
Last edited:
Can you also condemn all of the rhetoric from every other religion & spiritual group on this as well?

Actually, can you condemn all rhetoric? Please be specific, and list every condemnation separately.
 
Thing1 said:
Can you also condemn all of the rhetoric from every other religion & spiritual group on this as well?

Actually, can you condemn all rhetoric? Please be specific, and list every condemnation separately.
Click to expand...

And because the topic is whether this is a result of Islamic rhetoric, Thing immediately has to deflect and try very hard not to discuss Islamic rhetoric.
 
Seahawk said:
And because the topic is whether this is a result of Islamic rhetoric, Thing immediately has to deflect and try very hard not to discuss Islamic rhetoric.
Click to expand...

Speaks volumes that you can't condemn the rest. You must support all of it, then.

See how annoying that is? Probably not.
 
Thing1 said:
Speaks volumes that you can't condemn the rest. You must support all of it, then.

See how annoying that is? Probably not.
Click to expand...

I have condemned them, when someone makes a thread about it. This thread is about Islamic rhetoric and you just want to deflect because you want to appease them because you admit you are more scared of radical Muslims than radical Christians.

Whenever an issue revolves around Islamic rhetoric or terrorism, you do all you can to condemn those talking about Islam and saying it has nothing to do with Islam. We should call them something different to not piss them off. When it is Christian radicals, it apparently doesn't bother you at all.
 
Seahawk said:
I have condemned them, when someone makes a thread about it. This thread is about Islamic rhetoric and you just want to deflect because you want to appease them because you admit you are more scared of radical Muslims than radical Christians.

Whenever an issue revolves around Islamic rhetoric or terrorism, you do all you can to condemn those talking about Islam and saying it has nothing to do with Islam. We should call them something different to not piss them off. When it is Christian radicals, it apparently doesn't bother you at all.
Click to expand...

That's not your rule, Yurt.

You can't just condemn them on other threads. You have to condemn them on threads that you make, about completely different topics.

Your rule. Not mine.

Apparently, those other groups don't bother you. At all.
 
Since I am not Yurt, I don't know what rule you refer to. You obviously want to deflect from this and focus on Yurt.

Enjoy your Yurt time.
 
Seahawk said:
Since I am not Yurt, I don't know what rule you refer to. You obviously want to deflect from this and focus on Yurt.

Enjoy your Yurt time.
Click to expand...

The rule you established on my thread about calling it radical Islam.

Your rule. You don't even follow the rules you establish.
 
Milagro said:
I am sure that you know very well about Taqiyya, in fact you employ it on a regular basis. The only question is do you do this for free or are you being paid?
Click to expand...
I need to add that to my limited Islamic vocabulary..not something that comes up much, but every little bit helps an understanding
 
anatta said:
I need to add that to my limited Islamic vocabulary..not something that comes up much, but every little bit helps an understanding
Click to expand...

Glad to be of assistance, there is no doubt in my mind that Moonbat is an Islamic apologist. Sadly gullible people like Rana are taken in by him.
 
Thing1 said:
Speaks volumes that you can't condemn the rest. You must support all of it, then.

See how annoying that is? Probably not.
Click to expand...

Well, I don't condemn the rest - just Islamic rhetoric. All of that hurtful rhetoric which the Dalai Lama spews about the Chinese government? Perfectly alright.
 
Milagro said:
Glad to be of assistance, there is no doubt in my mind that Moonbat is an Islamic apologist. Sadly gullible people like Rana are taken in by him.
Click to expand...

You're only of ' assistance ' to opponents of fascism and anti-racists who use you as an example of far right ignorance. Thank you.
You're a proponent of hafrada. Stick that in your dictionary.

It's also clear that you know fuck-all about my location or gender- and that those whom you cannot corrupt- such as Rana- are your targets. In short - you're a half-formed fascist looking for some Internet pals to hang out with. Fuck off.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top