zappasguitar
Well-known member
Judge has ruled that facts about Martin cannot be presented.
Which "facts"?
Judge has ruled that facts about Martin cannot be presented.
the logic actually makes sense, his case is one of self defense, so he can only argue things about trayvon that he would have been able to know of at the time of the encounter. So trayvon smoking weed for example, or a picture of him with a gun, is completely immaterial to his defense and overall case.
Which "facts"?
As I said. I agree with te ruling.
Judge has ruled that facts about Martin cannot be presented.
Latent closeted homosexual desires of yours puddin pop?
It would be admissible if the prosecution were to paint him as a little angelEvidence like that is never admissible.
What would your false God think of killing an innocent black boy?
Martin's record doesn't look good.
http://www.gzdocs.com/documents/0513/discovery_3/extraction_reports/report1.pdf
Depends in the situation. We get it you hate the man with the Jew sounding name.
the logic actually makes sense, his case is one of self defense, so he can only argue things about trayvon that he would have been able to know of at the time of the encounter. So trayvon smoking weed for example, or a picture of him with a gun, is completely immaterial to his defense and overall case.
Show me the picture of Trayvon with the gun.
Show me the picture that proves Trayvon was smoking weed.
I have never thought of Zimmerman as Jewish.
any bets that the prosecution enters evidence of zimmermans past behavior and attitudes???
and martins wouldn't??? yes, zimmerman is being railroaded by a travesty of justice and you libs love it. pretty pathetic of all of you.If it lends credence to the case regarding motive it's allowed.