Is Donald Trump a “legitimate” president?

Yaya said:
So still no evidence that hacking dem corruption swayed voters enough to give him the win..

Typical liberal hysteria.
Click to expand...

It wouldn't be possible to garner actual evidence of such a thing, unless there was a specific poll to that effect.

Would you deny that Wikileaks was a big story during the campaign? I heard those on both the left and right say that the revelations would hurt Hillary & Democrats. Seems pretty naive to think that they wouldn't.

Some conclusions are just common sense.
 
Even though Thingy is a coward for thread banning me, I applaud his bravery in admitting there is NO evidence it actually won the election for Trump.

You guys have no evidence, yet claim he is not legitimate. You guys are birthers.
 
Yaya said:
Even though Thingy is a coward for thread banning me, I applaud his bravery in admitting there is NO evidence it actually won the election for Trump.

You guys have no evidence, yet claim he is not legitimate. You guys are birthers.
Click to expand...

And what a cowardly response.

But that is no surprise; you are an intellectual coward & lightweight. And a hack.
 
Thing1 said:
And what a cowardly response.

But that is no surprise; you are an intellectual coward & lightweight. And a hack.
Click to expand...
How was it cowardly? You're the thread ban coward that is too timid to allow me to respond to your hysterical threads.

You can think all you want, but the fact, as even you admit, there is ZERO evidence that it won Trump the election.

You can't take it back now. I know you will try, but you can't. Enjoy your safe space coward. BTW, your thread about saved jobs is false, good thing you banned me, because now you can live in your fantasy world with minimal counter view points.
 
Yaya said:
Even though Thingy is a coward for thread banning me, I applaud his bravery in admitting there is NO evidence it actually won the election for Trump.

You guys have no evidence, yet claim he is not legitimate. You guys are birthers.
Click to expand...

He's a coward...so are you Yurt.
 
Yaya said:
How was it cowardly? You're the thread ban coward that is too timid to allow me to respond to your hysterical threads.

You can think all you want, but the fact, as even you admit, there is ZERO evidence that it won Trump the election.

You can't take it back now. I know you will try, but you can't. Enjoy your safe space coward. BTW, your thread about saved jobs is false, good thing you banned me, because now you can live in your fantasy world with minimal counter view points.
Click to expand...

As I said, it's a common sense conclusion. You didn't answer the question from my post about Wikileaks being a big story. It was, and was often cited by both the right & left as damaging to Clinton.

I mean, be intellectually honest: do you really think those revelations had no effect?

LOL

And I threadbanned you because you're a pesky mosquito. You don't "counter" anything. You just post your usual hyperpartisan "but what about libs" BS.
 
Thing1 said:
As I said, it's a common sense conclusion. You didn't answer the question from my post about Wikileaks being a big story. It was, and was often cited by both the right & left as damaging to Clinton.

I mean, be intellectually honest: do you really think those revelations had no effect?

LOL

And I threadbanned you because you're a pesky mosquito. You don't "counter" anything. You just post your usual hyperpartisan "but what about libs" BS.
Click to expand...

You be honest...I know Yurt is fucking stupid as shit but you're trying to make the point that media matters. Do you really believe the MSM had much of an impact?
 
Guille said:
You be honest...I know Yurt is fucking stupid as shit but you're trying to make the point that media matters. Do you really believe the MSM had much of an impact?
Click to expand...

Sure - both ways. I think there was backlash against the MSM in general. But I think Access Hollywood really hurt Trump at that time. He had some momentum, and that redefined the campaign for awhile. I also think Wikileaks was a HUGE part of the campaign - just a steady drip drip the whole time.

How could anyone argue that had NO effect?
 
Thing1 said:
As I said, it's a common sense conclusion. You didn't answer the question from my post about Wikileaks being a big story. It was, and was often cited by both the right & left as damaging to Clinton.

I mean, be intellectually honest: do you really think those revelations had no effect?

LOL

And I threadbanned you because you're a pesky mosquito. You don't "counter" anything. You just post your usual hyperpartisan "but what about libs" BS.
Click to expand...
Did I say no effect?

Even the Intel community did not say it won Trump the election.

You're a cowardly liar that only falsely changes what I say to make some point.

It is common sense it won him the election, but there is no evidence.

I hope you never ever sit on jury, you're unfit.
 
Yaya said:
What don't I understand?

I've never seen you condemn the corruption, whereas I have condemned both hacking and the corruption.

I also note you still provided no proof this effected a Trump win.
Click to expand...
I believe the FBI, CIA and NSA and what they stated about Russia and our election.
 
Thing1 said:
Sure - both ways. I think there was backlash against the MSM in general. But I think Access Hollywood really hurt Trump at that time. He had some momentum, and that redefined the campaign for awhile. I also think Wikileaks was a HUGE part of the campaign - just a steady drip drip the whole time.

How could anyone argue that had NO effect?
Click to expand...

I don't think anyone by June 2016 was waiting to make up their mind.
 
Queen Snowflake said:
I saw a single mother on TV yesterday proclaiming that she has faith in Trump to improve her life. I wish someone would have asked her, as a minimum wage earner, how do you believe he will do this? They never ask these people what supports their beliefs.
Click to expand...

trump's pick for labor is a critic of the minimum wage too, and doesn't support raising it. The woman is just another person voting against her own best interests.
 
Yaya said:
Even though Thingy is a coward for thread banning me, I applaud his bravery in admitting there is NO evidence it actually won the election for Trump.

You guys have no evidence, yet claim he is not legitimate. You guys are birthers.
Click to expand...

He isn't legitimate because he doesn't act like a President should. I don't care if got every vote except mine. He disrespects swaths of citizens and basically behaves like an internet troll.
 
blackascoal said:
In other words good sister, convincing dumb people to vote for him was the easy part .. now all he has to do is figure out how in the hell does he make this work in th face of UNPRECEDENTED opposition

I agree with you.
Click to expand...

Opposition can't stop him from making the right choices to get America back on track. Everything he's done has been ahead of schedule and under-budget. Imagine if he brings that kind of savvy and applies to the federal government.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top