Is Artificial General Intelligence Here?

Hume

Verified User
In a commentary published today at Nature, a group of researchers, including two philosophers, argue that “once you clear away certain confusions, and strive to make fair comparisons and avoid anthropocentric biases, the conclusion is straightforward: by reasonable standards… we have artificial systems that are generally intelligent.”

 
If you define AGI as broad behavioral competence across lots of cognitive tasks and you accept behavior-first evidence as the primary yardstick, then such a conclusion can look “straightforward"

But that “if” is doing a lot of work.
 
If you define AGI as broad behavioral competence across lots of cognitive tasks and you accept behavior-first evidence as the primary yardstick, then such a conclusion can look “straightforward"

But that “if” is doing a lot of work.
AI only has to be effective in performing common human tasks. That has been achieved.
 
Back
Top