In May 2017, Mueller was appointed by the Justice Department as special counsel

Truth Detector

Truth Detector

Well-known member
Contributor
Isn't it about time to put up or shut up? This investigation which actually began in August of 2016 has been going on for more than a year and the Mueller investigation for more than FIVE months.

Shouldn't we, the American sheeple, be demanding an accounting for the costs of the investigation and when it is to end? Not one press conference to talk about the progress? No reporting on progress? No charges being filed? No report? Nothing?

In May 2017, Mueller was appointed by the Justice Department as special counsel, overseeing the investigation into alleged Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections and related matters.
 
extra-Constitutional investigations wandering at will where they go-
and we're supposed to just sit back while POTUS is investigated.

Bare in mind there was NO CRIME that even started this investigation
 
Yes, you just sit back and wait for the investigation to end. If that idiot hadn't fired the FBI director, and then bragged about it, maybe none of this would have happened.
 
You got to be kidding, seriously, the nine redundant Republican investigations of BenghaziGate went on for close to eight years continuously, and now you want an end to Mueller's investigation in five months?

It's like deficits and debt, how soon they forget when another occupies the White House
 
noise said:
extra-Constitutional investigations wandering at will where they go-
and we're supposed to just sit back while POTUS is investigated.

Bare in mind there was NO CRIME that even started this investigation
Click to expand...

This investigation was started by the President's own Justice Department, and Ken Star's investigation didn't begin with a crime either rather the investigation into if a crime had been committed, and it also drifted to cover umpteen topics unrelated to its intial purpose

The Mueller investigation isn't establishing any precedents
 
Mueller seemed far less interested in investigating pedophiles when he was Director than he is in investigating Trump today for some reason.
 
archives said:
This investigation was started by the President's own Justice Department, and Ken Star's investigation didn't begin with a crime either rather the investigation into if a crime had been committed, and it also drifted to cover umpteen topics unrelated to its intial purpose

The Mueller investigation isn't establishing any precedents
Click to expand...
Ken Starr was tasked to investigate Whitewater where there was already witness testimony there was a crime committed.
It was an investigation of an alleged crime . Hale was a convicted felon, but his charges were taken to investigate.

Yes i'm familiar with how Muellar was authorized, but the authorization made no allegations of a crime already committed. It's an investigation in search of a crime. the similarity is the drifting into "umpteen topics"
 
archives said:
This investigation was started by the President's own Justice Department, and Ken Star's investigation didn't begin with a crime either rather the investigation into if a crime had been committed, and it also drifted to cover umpteen topics unrelated to its intial purpose

The Mueller investigation isn't establishing any precedents
Click to expand...
Ignoring all of that, it boggles the mind that trump apologists dismiss the fact that Russia acted to destroy the foundation of our democracy, and they defend Putin.

I expect it from most here. Believe it or not, anatta/noise was fairly lucid at one point in his life.
 
floridafool said:
How long did the Clinton investigation take?
Click to expand...

You don't know? The Clinton Whitewater investigation was very public with numerous pronouncements from Ken Starr and the prosecutors. Why nothing from Mueller? What is he hiding?

floridafool said:
How long did the Nixon investigation take?
Click to expand...

You don't know? The Watergate investigation was very public with numerous pronouncements and leaks from the prosecutors. Why nothing from Mueller? What is he hiding?
 
floridafool said:
Yes, you just sit back and wait for the investigation to end. If that idiot hadn't fired the FBI director, and then bragged about it, maybe none of this would have happened.
Click to expand...

How is he an idiot? Presidents can't fire those who work for them? When did this change come about? Presidents can't have opinions? Since when?

We know who the idiots are; they come from the Party of the Jackass and make stupid specious claims that can only be supported by hyperbole and hearsay.
 
archcries said:
You got to be kidding, seriously, the nine redundant Republican investigations of BenghaziGate went on for close to eight years continuously, and now you want an end to Mueller's investigation in five months?

It's like deficits and debt, how soon they forget when another occupies the White House
Click to expand...

That is a lie; what is it about leftist liars and their propensity to spew utter garbage?

Benghazi occurred on September 11, 2012 you moron. And for the next four years the media lied and defended Hitlery as if she had NOTHING to do with the event. An event the Obama administration LIED about.


And now you repulsive hypocrites think that a President should be investigated because......wait for it.....YOU DON'T LIKE HIM. Morons.
 
noise said:
Ken Starr was tasked to investigate Whitewater where there was already witness testimony there was a crime committed.
It was an investigation of an alleged crime . Hale was a convicted felon, but his charges were taken to investigate.

Yes i'm familiar with how Muellar was authorized, but the authorization made no allegations of a crime already committed. It's an investigation in search of a crime. the similarity is the drifting into "umpteen topics"
Click to expand...

Yes or no, was there proof that a crime had been committed when Starr began his investigation? "Witness testimony" isn't proof of a crime committed

And if you want to stretch your argument, the same logic could be applied using proof provided by the intelligence agencies that the Russian had interfered in the American political process, substitute "witness testimony" for agencies agencies and the inane logic is back to square one

If you can't admit that the years of the Starr investigation was a "investigation in search of a crime" then explain how one goes from the Whitewater investigation to Vince Foster to White House personnel getting fired to abuse of confidential FBI files to Madison Guaranty to the Rose Law Firm to Paula Jones and ultimately Monica Lewinsky
 
archcries said:
This investigation was started by the President's own Justice Department, and Ken Star's investigation didn't begin with a crime either rather the investigation into if a crime had been committed,
Click to expand...

So you don't know the difference? What crime is Trump being investigated for?

archcries said:
and it also drifted to cover umpteen topics unrelated to its intial purpose
Click to expand...

Wrong; it evolved when more criminal acts were committed by BillyBob Clinton. Fascinating that you defenders of women rights in the workplace think it is fine for a married man of great power to have sex with interns and then lie under oath about it.

archcries said:
The Mueller investigation isn't establishing any precedents
Click to expand...

It absolutely is; it is an investigation with ZERO guidelines, no criminal charges or intent to commit crimes and is merely a massive fishing expedition based on innuendo and hyperbole. Liberals are too stupid to comprehend the precedents being set here.
 
Truth Detector said:
The Watergate investigation was very public with numerous pronouncements and leaks from the prosecutors. Why nothing from Mueller? What is he hiding?
Click to expand...

Well, back in May, Mueller subpoenaed the Podesta brother's lobbying firm. The records he got would have detailed Manafort's activities in the Ukrainian election - which Hillary's State Department was very interested in.



Mercury had worked on the Ukraine lobbying project with the Podesta group, led by Anthony Podesta, brother of John Podesta, who led Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign.


http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/politics/ct-mueller-subpoenas-lobbying-firms-russia-investigation-20170825-story.html


The Podesta Group was lobbying for the same thing they are trying to nail Manafort for. And was also not registered as a foreign agent.

At the time, Ukraine was run by a pro-Russian political party that had paid Manafort $17 million for consulting in 2013 and 2014, according to Manafort's latest foreign lobbying disclosure filing, which he filed belatedly under Justice Department pressure.
 
NOTAllthere said:
Ignoring all of that, it boggles the mind that trump apologists dismiss the fact that Russia acted to destroy the foundation of our democracy, and they defend Putin.
Click to expand...

Once again we have a lying liberal leftist propagating outright bullshit.

NOTAllthere said:
I expect it from most here. Believe it or not, anatta/noise was fairly lucid at one point in his life.
Click to expand...

We can expect you to erupt with buffoonish bullshit being the lying leftist that you are.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top