If your goal is to end illegal migrant invasions...

Hawkeye10 said:
The Revolution has no intention of ending their program of destruction of America via mass importation of people hostile to Old America....i suggest a counter revolution is the way to end the operation....however offloading the 40ish million who are here now ranges from difficult to impossible.
Click to expand...

to the left to the left,

to the left to the left,

everything you own in a box to the left....

don't you ever get to thinking......


you're irreplaceable....

 
Nordberg said:
You are sure in direct conflict with businesses that have been hiring illegals forever. Trump hired many of them when needed and kept many others working on his golf courses.
Click to expand...

Yep. Prosecute every employer of illegals. Trump didn't hire them, his managers did. Don't be a fool.
 
Phantasmal said:
Agreed, I don’t want an open border, but I do believe in immigration and asylum for those with a real need. I support more border agents, more judges and processors.
Click to expand...

I want our border closed. I believe in LEGAL immigration, waiting in line and requiring to speak English. NO asylum! Illegals should be deported, those harboring them deported as well.
I support more border agents and whatever blockades they would request, whether it be a wall, razor wire (preferred) or manned gun towers. We don't need more judges or processors,
they are a big strain on our courts and taxes. It's about time this country cracks down on illegals, both those already here (NO possibility of ever reentering) and those attempting to enter.
 
QP! said:
If your goal is to end illegal migrant invasions... as Magat's like to pretend, why are 22 Magat States trying to end one of the most successful TEST programs (CHNV Humanitarian Program), that is working to dramatically reduced illegal migration flow from the countries in the program (Cuba, Honduras, Nicaragua and Venezuela), by giving them a clear legal path to apply that involves a financial sponsor (usual family) who have to take financial responsibility for the person?

The Judge denied the States 'Standing' citing that the PROGRAM IS WORKING and thus they could not demonstrate harm...




But is the judge confused. Is it because IT IS WORKING, ... it is reducing illegals but also paving a path to citizenship, that Magat States want to end it?

And is that because of the shade of skin, that typically comes with people like these?
Click to expand...

"Sponsors" do not have to be legal U.S. citizens.
Fees are waived despite the massive debt that our children are burdened with.
We are already overwhelmed with new, poor uneducated migrants, daily.
There is no public benefit.




"To sponsor a CHNV applicant, an individual must be a U.S. citizen, a lawful permanent resident, or hold a U.S. lawful status such as Temporary Protected Status, asylum, parole, deferred action, or Deferred Enforced Departure. While an individual can file to become a sponsor, it’s also possible for a business, organization, or multiple individuals to jointly take on the responsibility of sponsoring a CHNV applicant. "


And cherry picking 4 countries is discriminatory.
 
Last edited:
Hawkeye10 said:
I did not decode this post.
Click to expand...

of course you don't.

the notion of packing bags, coming and goings, replaceability, betrayal.

all the themes of the illegal immigration debate.

you're too dumb to see that.

my wisdom is like pearls before your swine-like understandings.
 
Bigdog said:
"Sponsors" do not have to be legal U.S. citizens.
Fees are waived despite the massive debt that our children are burdened with.
We are already overwhelmed with new, poor uneducated migrants, daily.
There is no public benefit.




"To sponsor a CHNV applicant, an individual must be a U.S. citizen, a lawful permanent resident, or hold a U.S. lawful status such as Temporary Protected Status, asylum, parole, deferred action, or Deferred Enforced Departure. While an individual can file to become a sponsor, it’s also possible for a business, organization, or multiple individuals to jointly take on the responsibility of sponsoring a CHNV applicant. "


And cherry picking 4 countries is discriminatory.
Click to expand...

So are you against all migration, full stop, period? No new legal refugees, no new legal migrants or immigrants?

As this is giving a legal path, where people are selected via the current constitutional requirements.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top